Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GJGCA

(167 posts)
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 08:36 PM Thursday

Gavin Newsom's ex-chief of staff charged with corruption

Source: MSNBC

The California Democratic Party is reeling from the arrest of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s former chief of staff in a corruption case involving a top aide to former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra.

Neither the term-limited governor nor Becerra, who is running to succeed Newsom, is accused of wrongdoing.

Both have spent the past day distancing themselves from the investigation into Dana Williamson, a longtime political strategist who was Newsom’s chief of staff from early 2023 to November 2024, and Sean McCluskie, who was Becerra’s chief of staff at HHS and his top deputy when Becerra was the state’s attorney general.

Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/shows/top-stories/blog/rcna243715

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ancianita

(42,635 posts)
1. IS the CDP reeling, MSNBC? Putting your typical corporate taint on a great Democrat, aren't you.
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 08:48 PM
Thursday

Just business. Serving up more both siderism haterade.

stopdiggin

(14,735 posts)
3. you feel the term 'reeling' is way over the top?
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 09:20 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Nov 13, 2025, 11:01 PM - Edit history (1)

These are a couple of top level people. I doubt anyone over at the party is exactly dancing a jig about it. True - they may well have known this was coming (forewarned and forearmed). But it ain't exactly GOOD news - and it ain't exactly ho-hum either. Not a great day no matter how you slice the taters.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ancianita

(42,635 posts)
4. Yes. And I said why. Mostly I'm annoyed.
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 10:18 PM
Thursday

They WERE top level people. But they're not now. They're just not.

I just don't get what this news means, given the overall corruption of this privatized federal government that's drowning this country in corruption, a sick economy, spreading dark days of governmental attacks on American civilians.

If you think it's not ho-hum, please explain to a fellow Democrat why this is the big deal it's presented as.

stopdiggin

(14,735 posts)
5. because when top level people (inhabiting EITHER party) are indicted for corruption and fraud
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 10:58 PM
Thursday

It is news. And - I for one, think it should be. (and no - I don't, and won't buy in to either the "bothsiderism", or the "in comparison to what else ..." dodge.

It's wrong - it's relevant - and it should be exposed and reported on.

And - to repeat my point ... If the Democratic party is not precisely 'reeling' tonight - it's pretty safe to say there is not a lot of revelry and gay abandon in evidence either.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ancianita

(42,635 posts)
7. I get it. Okay, one guy was arrested. That's it. And no, NOT a top level person "inhabiting" the party.
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 12:04 AM
Friday

It's not even a more newsworthy indictment, it's only an "investigation" and one arrest that's reported. And Democrats should be reeling from that? Sure, an investigation/arrest should be reported. But that the governor and Becerra (who worked under Biden) should be distancing themselves from this for a whole day, wow. And this is not even a federal case yet. Way to go, MSNBC.

And you say they should be "exposed."? when you know by now that what this DOJ exposes are Nothingburgers.

Just consider for a minute this DOJ, and the privatized business 74 million voters put us in.
Consider that this country's gutted federal government is drowning in corruption that runs wide and deep, from violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution to violating the Hatch Act, to money laundering, to fraud, blackmail, covering up child sex trafficking, to tearing down the people's White House -- and those are just the federal crimes they lie about.
Then there's producing a sickened, weak economy; and people dead because of hospital and nursing home shutdowns due to NHS, FAA incompetence; and military style attacks and arrests of non-criminal, law abiding American civilians, to nationwide concentration camps -- these ongoing vengeful acts of convicted felon and his henchmen, to be escalated by 2026.

Go ahead and call it a big deal. Okay, fine.
But I'm still a hard no to MSNBC on this one, and not buying into any of this as important.
One can lose perspective when one thinks one's party must be perfect. Like Obama says, "Better is good." We're the better party, and not just because we're not the corrupt party, but for many other reasons that are historical firsts.

Thanks for the discussion. Have a good night.





stopdiggin

(14,735 posts)
8. It's a big deal. (whether you assign it that status or not) And there's a WHOLE lot of people tonight
Fri Nov 14, 2025, 12:29 AM
Friday

Last edited Sat Nov 15, 2025, 01:22 PM - Edit history (1)

that are hoping it doesn't tar a possible run. Because you can be most certain - that every effort will be made ...
(and, just for clarification - I would not be one of above. at the same time - one can not wheedle around the stark fact that it clearly bears implications for any such ambitions.)

ancianita

(42,635 posts)
9. That's what MSNBC wants you to think. That any one Democratic legal problem is a big deal is what ALL
Sat Nov 15, 2025, 12:53 PM
Saturday

corporate media want to make Democrats think. That right there is what annoys. Cuz it's not about what I think. It's about what MSNBC, like other corporate media, want to train people to think about Democrats beyond the facts.

Because if you or "a whole lot of people tonight" fall for the false equivalency that Democrats have the same legal and corruption problems Republicans do, a whole lot of people fall for a corporate LIE.

People even in California aren't falling for that, so why should we. Seriously. Get a national perspective, and don't be trained on the corporate one. Have you seen any other media followups on this? No? Because it's really not a big deal.

stopdiggin

(14,735 posts)
10. every rag in the state (and the majority across the country) are reporting on this 'scandal'
Sat Nov 15, 2025, 01:21 PM
Saturday

And very, very, very few - are attempting to present it as "no biggie",

I fear that your overall disenchantment with 'the media' - has allowed you to miss the mark on this particular story (however right you might be about others, or general tenor .. )

Fiendish Thingy

(21,567 posts)
6. If association with corrupt individuals taints Republicans, why wouldn't it taint Democrats? Nt
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 11:39 PM
Thursday
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gavin Newsom's ex-chief o...