Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(156,823 posts)
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 08:00 PM 6 hrs ago

'Impermissible': Trump hit with blistering court response in bid to sue judges

Source: Raw Story

July 21, 2025 5:46PM ET


A federal court in Maryland has responded to President Donald Trump's out-of-the-box plan to sue judges who ruled against him -- and pulled no punches. Last month, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland instituted a two-day pause in deportations as part of a habeas ruling in favor of immigrants challenging their detention in that state. Trump's Justice Department responded by suing the court and every judge sitting on it.

"Every unlawful order entered by the district courts robs the Executive Branch of its most scarce resource: time to put its policies into effect. In the process, such orders diminish the votes of the citizens who elected the head of the Executive Branch," said the complaint. But the court has issued its own response to the lawsuit, tearing it apart at every level. This lawsuit, the court wrote, "is impermissible."

"It is an effort by one branch in its institutional capacity to sue another branch in its institutional capacity seeking what amounts to an advisory opinion unmoored from any specific case or controversy. The courts have confronted similar efforts by legislators to sue in their official capacity, and have routinely rejected them on nonjusticiability grounds."

"While the Executive enjoys the distinct power to sue in the name of the United States to enforce laws and ensure that they are faithfully executed, it does not enjoy any free-floating authority to sue a coordinate branch of government," the response continued. "Such a suit is nonjusticiable, and the fate of the standing orders can and should be resolved in an ordinary case or controversy."

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-sues-judges/



Link to FILING (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.584990/gov.uscourts.mdd.584990.25.0.pdf

REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143485655
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Impermissible': Trump hit with blistering court response in bid to sue judges (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 6 hrs ago OP
"the citizens who elected the head of the executive branch" johnnyfins 6 hrs ago #1
We did NOT elect a president to be given full immunity vapor2 5 hrs ago #2
This link isn't to the Court's order; it's the defendants' memorandum Ocelot II 5 hrs ago #3
I had changed it to a "filing". BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #5
Good ! republianmushroom 5 hrs ago #4
So let me see if I got this right Dem4life1970 4 hrs ago #6
Hear! Hear! Gimpyknee 3 hrs ago #7
Something we can all do. multigraincracker 3 hrs ago #8
I doubt that the courts will move to a golf course. usonian 3 hrs ago #9

johnnyfins

(2,438 posts)
1. "the citizens who elected the head of the executive branch"
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 08:16 PM
6 hrs ago

And what about the rest of the citizenry? Do we not count? Isn't the head of the executive branch for ALL of the citizens?

vapor2

(2,710 posts)
2. We did NOT elect a president to be given full immunity
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 08:26 PM
5 hrs ago

nor we elect a president with reckless unchecked powers where 14 million are removed from healthcare and USAID is ended with people dying. We did not elect for this regime to take money from the working class and give to the billionaires.

Ocelot II

(126,066 posts)
3. This link isn't to the Court's order; it's the defendants' memorandum
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 08:35 PM
5 hrs ago

supporting their motion to dismiss and opposing the government's motion for a preliminary injunction. According to the dockert the court hasn't ruled; there's a hearing on the motion on August 13. https://www.scribd.com/document/889951605/Docket-16july25-MD-USA-v-JUDGES

Dem4life1970

(938 posts)
6. So let me see if I got this right
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 10:22 PM
4 hrs ago

The same guy who used the legal system to delay, delay, delay all of his investigations and trials and gum up the legal gears to get off scot-free is complaining about the courts holding him up? Sounds like he's getting a taste of his own medicine. More of this please. Take him to court if he gets up in the morning.

multigraincracker

(35,999 posts)
8. Something we can all do.
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 10:58 PM
3 hrs ago

Donate to the Democrats and GOTV for the upcoming Midterm elections. It’d be like castrating him for 2 years if we take both house of congress.

usonian

(19,163 posts)
9. I doubt that the courts will move to a golf course.
Mon Jul 21, 2025, 11:00 PM
3 hrs ago

Health too bad to golf?

Maybe hear the case in tennis courts?
Food courts?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Impermissible': Trump hi...