'Impermissible': Trump hit with blistering court response in bid to sue judges
Source: Raw Story
July 21, 2025 5:46PM ET
A federal court in Maryland has responded to President Donald Trump's out-of-the-box plan to sue judges who ruled against him -- and pulled no punches. Last month, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland instituted a two-day pause in deportations as part of a habeas ruling in favor of immigrants challenging their detention in that state. Trump's Justice Department responded by suing the court and every judge sitting on it.
"Every unlawful order entered by the district courts robs the Executive Branch of its most scarce resource: time to put its policies into effect. In the process, such orders diminish the votes of the citizens who elected the head of the Executive Branch," said the complaint. But the court has issued its own response to the lawsuit, tearing it apart at every level. This lawsuit, the court wrote, "is impermissible."
"It is an effort by one branch in its institutional capacity to sue another branch in its institutional capacity seeking what amounts to an advisory opinion unmoored from any specific case or controversy. The courts have confronted similar efforts by legislators to sue in their official capacity, and have routinely rejected them on nonjusticiability grounds."
"While the Executive enjoys the distinct power to sue in the name of the United States to enforce laws and ensure that they are faithfully executed, it does not enjoy any free-floating authority to sue a coordinate branch of government," the response continued. "Such a suit is nonjusticiable, and the fate of the standing orders can and should be resolved in an ordinary case or controversy."
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-sues-judges/
Link to FILING (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.584990/gov.uscourts.mdd.584990.25.0.pdf
REFERENCE - https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143485655

johnnyfins
(2,438 posts)And what about the rest of the citizenry? Do we not count? Isn't the head of the executive branch for ALL of the citizens?
vapor2
(2,710 posts)nor we elect a president with reckless unchecked powers where 14 million are removed from healthcare and USAID is ended with people dying. We did not elect for this regime to take money from the working class and give to the billionaires.
Ocelot II
(126,066 posts)supporting their motion to dismiss and opposing the government's motion for a preliminary injunction. According to the dockert the court hasn't ruled; there's a hearing on the motion on August 13. https://www.scribd.com/document/889951605/Docket-16july25-MD-USA-v-JUDGES
BumRushDaShow
(156,823 posts)
republianmushroom
(20,690 posts)Screw you, chief justice roberts.
Dem4life1970
(938 posts)The same guy who used the legal system to delay, delay, delay all of his investigations and trials and gum up the legal gears to get off scot-free is complaining about the courts holding him up? Sounds like he's getting a taste of his own medicine. More of this please. Take him to court if he gets up in the morning.
Gimpyknee
(358 posts)multigraincracker
(35,999 posts)Donate to the Democrats and GOTV for the upcoming Midterm elections. Itd be like castrating him for 2 years if we take both house of congress.
usonian
(19,163 posts)Health too bad to golf?
Maybe hear the case in tennis courts?
Food courts?