TWO PERVERTS

nt

I think I'm happy to say I don't recognize the majority of those names.

Not that the Old Man's criminal connections aren't worth pursuing, I'm just happy that I've avoided enough Trump-centric media that I can maintain some bliss.

Now I'm having to resist looking them up.

Sigh.

... at least several of them.

Same story over and over.

It is really like something has changed. The media all of a sudden decides this is the story that will take down trump? Really? Immediately after they pass this pos bill. Right after him and Elon have a public falling out? Something wreaks. No handful of men should have the power to flip a switch like this after the pain they have caused our lives.

that was done to hound Biden for months about dropping out. I.e., the "drip, drip, drip".

In this case there are differences (outside of us knowing the media is generally owned by the RW so there is often a "catch" ) -

1.) 45 has no shame and "shaming" him failed in the past with the release of the Access Hollywood tapes and his macho manosphere base loved that type of bravado.

2.) However the thrust seems to be targeting his loon base, which itself has "factions", where the QAnon nuts based much of their philosophy on purported "pedophilia rings" and whatnot. They were convinced the rings were run by Democrats (prompting the whole "pizzagate" nonsense) and they literally spent 10 years indoctrinating their followers and others who became MAGats, where Epstein's mess fit right in perfectly with the CT, and they had anecdotal pics of Epstein and Clinton. So the files collected for Epstein's various run-ins with the law and trial, were promised to reveal all these high-level Democrats. But alas...

At this point, "it's a story" that is letting the tabloid media have a field day but is also allowing the RW M$M to effectively "bury" other stories dealing with the destruction of the U.S. government that is underway amongst a slow-acting court system and with the blessing of the Roberts SCOTUS.

Meanwhile the "manwhore" Muskrat is helping to fuel the discord (for his own benefit).

they believe they can control vance.

And his name is Peter Theil.

What billionaire hasn't lent a friend, neighbor, business partner, club member, or fraternity connection their favourite pocket politician on occasion.

It's not like Theil hasn't ever asked a buddy for a favor. Now he'll get to return it.

As long as the other oligarchs don't want Vance for something against Theil's interests, he might be open to a deal.

Got to get his money back somehow.

about it until most of the damage had been done.

Now I suspect they are bringing this to the front because of trump's erratic economic policies, from the constantly changing uncertain tariff policies, to the blind deportations of undocumented people which are essential to many industries in the economy, not the least are the farmers.

No one should be surprised that the oligarchs are are trying to push trump out because they cannot control the sociopath, and having vance takes over makes perfect sense because they can control vance.

Anyone wonder if 60 minutes will do a story of the relationship between epstein and trump?

The fickleness of the public is a factor too. Media have algorithms they monitor, just like social media automates algorithms.

A tipping point arrives unplanned and unannounced and unforeseeable. Add a grain of sand at a time to the top of a pile and at some point there will be a little avalanche. When is not predictable.

The media report stories when they have them. Larger analysis pieces and opinions may be held back for effect, but even those are relatively random. CBS does not call up the LA Times and say "we've got some news but we want to release it at the same time you release some news; got any news?"

So the media reports on Blondi saying she has lists and documents on her desk. Then maga says something. Then tRump says something. Then Blondi says there is no list and there is nothing to see here. None of those reports are coordinated.

But the media does assign reporters to leads and stories according to interest. Now that there is a lot of public interest and social media chatter, you bet they are assigning more reporters to the story.

Nobody flipped a switch.

Elite meetings that influence media topics in 2025

While it's difficult to definitively say which specific "elite meetings" set media topics, several high-profile gatherings attract significant attention and discussions that often spill over into media coverage, shaping the narrative around important issues. Here are some examples from 2025:

World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting (Davos, Switzerland): The WEF brings together global leaders from business, government, civil society, and academia to discuss global challenges and potential solutions. Discussions at Davos often center on themes like global cooperation, economic growth, technological advancements (especially AI), and the climate crisis. These discussions, and the insights shared by prominent figures, can influence how these topics are framed and covered in the media throughout the year.

Bilderberg Meeting (Stockholm, Sweden): A private annual gathering of around 120-150 European and North American political and business elites, academics, and journalists. While operating under the Chatham House Rule, meaning discussions are kept confidential, the list of attendees and the broad themes discussed are often reported on. The 2025 meeting included topics like the transatlantic relationship, Ukraine, the US economy, Europe, the Middle East, the authoritarian axis, defense innovation, AI, deterrence and national security, proliferation, the geopolitics of energy and critical minerals, depopulation, and migration. The very secrecy of the meeting often fuels speculation and discussion in the media, particularly from those concerned about the influence of powerful groups on global affairs.

G7 Summit (Canada): This meeting of leaders from the seven largest advanced economies aims to address global economic and political issues. While achieving consensus among the G7 members can be challenging. The summit's ability to present a united front on issues like relations with Russia and China can also shape the media narrative around these topics.

Media and Journalism Conferences: Events specifically focused on the media industry, [and] can influence how issues are covered and framed in the media.

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) meetings and initiatives: The CFR regularly convenes discussions, publishes analysis, and fosters dialogue on foreign policy and shape the way these are discussed in the media.

It's important to note that the influence of these meetings on media topics is complex and multifaceted. Media coverage is also shaped by other factors such as current events, public interest, and journalistic priorities.

Not mentioned is The Trilateral Comission, who's stated main goal is shaping aka "durecting" the global media narritives.

It's a fake word. We've been TOTALLY programmed to shame anyone who uses said made up word.

JUST DID NOT GIVE A FUCK.

repubes think this shit is cute. Their kids are going to grow up like this, also embracing the lying grift insulting shit that your republicon leader models day and night.

Thank you sweet ladies.

“Big beautiful” secret.

that goes back to publication by other sources as far back as 2016. In fact, remember that Epstein was initially charged back in 2008 when stuff started coming out.

But none of this "stuck" to 45 because of the media fixation on the Clintons instead and the "both sides" nonsense.

Was not just a participant. I think he was a procurer.
I always wonder why he bought those teen beauty pageants. This was the pipeline.

JMHO

You would think they would be ashamed.

Even knowing what we now know.

HE;s the CHOSEN ONE! No good stupid dumb assholes!!!

…. sources have been known for years. The Steele Dossier covered some of it and the MSM was
quick to tow the party line that the dossier had been discredited. Stories of Trump with young
women and cocaine @ Studio 54 were well known too. Rupert Murdoch had to have known all
this stuff for years. I think T.P.T.B. are done with Trump and his end of his Presidency is coming
up soon.

"Mr. Houraney’s then-girlfriend and business partner, Jill Harth, later accused Mr. Trump of sexual misconduct on the night of the party. In a lawsuit, Ms. Harth said that Mr. Trump took her into a bedroom and forcibly kissed and fondled her, and restrained her from leaving. She also said that a 22-year-old contestant told her that Mr. Trump later that night crawled into her bed uninvited."

As long as someone has money, they can do whatever they want. It has always been so, and nothing has changed.

But, let's keep working to 'put things back as they were'.

When is enough going to be enough?

Apologies for the derogatory phrase. It is horrific.

Say what? "She also said that a 22-year-old contestant told her that Mr. Trump later that night crawled into her bed uninvited."

What kind of party has two guests, a bunch of young girls, and they all stay overnight -- and then are surprised when the host tries to sleep with them?

But she was 22, so it isn't creepy as hell, or rape or anything.

NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/19/us/politics/inside-trump-epstein-friendship.html

Archived (no paywall) link: https://archive.ph/hcsoP

Anyone who's been paying attention for the last 8 or 9 years has probably already read this stuff. Yes these stories have been published before, but this is a first for the NY Times.

Is Rupert Murdoch going to start printing the Epstein stories in his papers? Hmmmm.....

I've read almost all of this before, and I'll bet you have too.

We DUers were up on this stuff long before the rest of the American people.

Thanks to corporate news media (being complicit with Chump) most Americans never heard about his activities with Epstein and all the others. Anyone who watches Faux Noise exclusively has probably never heard this stuff before. It's up to us to spread it around.

finally gets a few more rocks turned over.

People voted for him anyhow.

I could be wrong, but I think the NYT became AWARE in 2019 that Trump hosted the Epstein-only audience event which occurred in the 1990s. I think that it is only NOW that the NYT got around to publishing an article relating that information.

since it seems like a lot of people either forgot about it previously, or didn't care.

I'm very glad they're putting it out there again.

(maybe trying to go for a Pulitzer or something)

Nature of it all. Young girls are so expendable to them, you know?
It must have been so easy to convince the men there that they weren’t as young as they looked.
Feel so bad that these women have been denied justice for so long. (And still are)
Women of America know damn well these kinds of men. Why we would still pick the bear.

In many cases the girls were recruited from broken homes, parents missing, some were failing school or dropped out completely. The promise of money and acting jobs, or modelling jobs, was enticing to the girls. Their parental oversight was lax or non-existent. In some cases parents worked multiple jobs and the kids were on their own.

These weren't girls being raised in middle-class homes, you know? They weren't college-bound for sure. Ghislaine Maxwell and other adults knew how to recruit these teenage girls and get them to comply. It was shockingly easy to get one girl to recruit her friends, once she was "in the fold."

Epstein had no interest in boys, but he might have procured boys for some of his wealthy clients, if that was their interest. I don't know because the news stories haven't said anything about it. Whenever the DoJ documents are finally released I guess we'll find out.

Jesus Fucking Christ

A lot of this information has been known for years. Too many people didn't care.

Trump hosted a party "for" young women and Epstein was the only guest.

... which means the "young women" were party favors.

sounds like RECRUITMENT to me

This may have been old news but it needed to hammered home repeatedly.

Too little too late.

In 2019, one source told the NYT of the 1990s Mara Lago event. Maybe, from 2019 until now, the NYT has been building an iron-clad defense of the story. Trump has already sued the NYT over its publication. The newspaper recognized the need to have other sources corroborate the story before it proceeded to publish it.

Now that the NYT had published the story, I have posted my comment about it on my website. I hope the story gains traction and creates much consternation for Trump.

I’m fairly proficient in Trump crap but this specific one passed me by. I read the account of the girl who said Trump raped her, which I found totally believable.

I knew about his friendship with Epstein but I never heard Trump was procuring girls for him. That’s what this is. Grooming 101.

But you’re probably right. This needed to be investigated.

I use the word "facts" confidently, because I am sure the NYT confirmed all of its research before publishinjg the story.

To my knowledge, the allegation was not previously reported by any news outlet possessing any measure of integrity.

Yes, the lawsuit by the woman who alleged in her court filing that Trump raped here has been well known for years. The woman discontinued pursuing the lawsuit, and no one seems to know what became of her, or if she is still alive.

Now that the NYT has published its article this weekend, I have trumpeted (pun?) it on my website.

Best wishes.

nt

and Matchmaker

What next???

Just when they fucking orange asshole thinks he can catch his breath, another story comes out

I’m hoping for a stroke but a massive heart attack always works

Then hit them up for money.

There is something new every day. And you can bet the media is relishing a scandal that perhaps brings another president down.

They're already getting disgusted by this pedo stuff, and it's not going to stop.

The only reason they didn't know this stuff before is that FAUX NOISE didn't tell them.
How many are going to figure it out? Stop voting for Chump, and stop listening to Faux Noise.

Jesus effing Christ.........