waste more time with frivolous lawsuits, felon. The only thing you do consistently is lose in court over this matter.

for the primary sexual misconduct case.

... just paid the judgement, it would probably cost less than the lawyers who are risking eternal damnation just for representing him in all these suits. But, that's his M.O. – sue to delay, delay, delay, because he cannot bear to be seen to lose.

If the judgement is ever upheld by the Supreme Court, the system might actually make him pay it himself.

the $5 million (and the later $83 million) had to be paid or put in escrow (which could be as a bond) pending results of the appeal.

That was done last year -

And then there's the NYS civil fraud case, presided over by Judge Engoron, who entered a judgment against him for $354 million in damages. (The bond came from Chubb, as did the $83 million one.)

If Trump pays the judgement it couldm hurt his rape-putation,

But his inability to admit to even the most obvious guilt should cost him a fortune in interest.

... representing him gets paid up front. His rep precedes him, and anyone with the brains of a potted plant trusts him about as far as they can throw a garbage truck.

Let alone judgments? Kings with private armies are not subject to the law.

Then she can be paid from his estate.

No point in levying on other assets.

Although I personally, and many others, wouldn't mind seeing her clean his clock financially.

that when a trial court hears evidence and decides against them that they can go and argue the evidence all over again at the appellate level and on up. So they keep arguing the evidence/testimony over and over publicly saying "They got it wrong and I'll appeal." As noted here the appellate courts will hear arguments about procedural errors and objections made at trial etc. but they do not provide a place for you to re-argue the evidence.

Just like when a Bozo's that get a "not guilty" verdict in a trial and then go and claim that the verdict proves they didn't do it. The verdict doesn't prove anything of the kind. The verdict finds the other side didn't prove their case to the point of swaying the judge/jury to take away the presumption of innocence. In other words despite having a presumption of innocence a person may as a matter of fact committed the crime. Plenty of people walking around who get found "not guilty" but in fact did commit the crime. The verdict doesn't take away the reality of the true fact.

asshole appeal the verdict? Didn’t he already lose an appeal a few weeks ago?

When is this over, and does he pay interest?

On December 30, 2024, a three judge panel of the second circuit denied Trump's appeal of the District Court decision. Thereupon, Trump filed a timely petition to have his appeal re-heard "en banc" by the full second circuit. That petition was denied on June 13, 2025. During the pendency of the rehearing en banc petition the effective date of the "mandate" of the second circuit's three-judge panel decision was stayed.

The decision today is not a new decision -- rather it is the issuance of the mandate. The opinion being quoted in some news stories about today's action actually is the same opinion that the three judge panel issued on December 30, 2024.

Presumably, Trump will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court along with a petition seeking a stay of the mandate. By rule, the mandate will be automatically stayed until SCOTUS acts on the petition.

who have already basically given him unlimited power and continue to reaffirm their support for an unrestrained POTUS. This I suspect will change drasticslly if we ever get a Democrat in the White House.

Seriously, Matt Gaetz must be so confused over why he doesn't have a job.

Pay her, you POS!!

He'll call them losers and claim there was no reason to lose the case.
Besides, the judge was an Obama lover.

She said interest is compounding at 9% compounded daily.

In the book she said the total judgment was up to 100 Million.

That is the sum of both judgments from the original trial and the defamation trial

(If he does croak on Tuesday, I may be in a bit o' trouble.)

Pay up, Donald!!!