Israeli plan for forced transfer of Gaza's population 'a blueprint for crimes against humanity'
Source: Guardian
Israels defence minister has laid out plans to force all Palestinians in Gaza into a camp on the ruins of Rafah, in a scheme which legal experts and academics described as a blueprint for crimes against humanity.
Israel Katz said he has ordered Israels military to prepare for establishing a camp, which he called a humanitarian city, on the ruins of the city of Rafah, Haaretz newspaper reported.
Palestinians would go through security screening before entering, and once inside would not be allowed to leave, Katz said at a briefing for Israeli journalists.
Israeli forces would control the perimeter of the site and initially move 600,000 Palestinians into the area, Katz said, mostly people currently displaced in the al-Mawasi area.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/07/israeli-minister-reveals-plan-to-force-population-of-gaza-into-camp-on-ruins-of-rafah
Katz told the journalists that they intend to eventually move the entire population of Gaza there, and then an emigration plan '"will happen."
The article quotes Michael Sfard, described as one of Israel's leading human rights lawyers, who said this is "nothing less than" a crime against humanity.
Hosts, please note - this is not the same news story as a Reuters exclusive about a proposal for re-education camps an American group offered the Trump administration, which I posted earlier: https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143492494 . This is from the Israeli government.

in2herbs
(3,859 posts)Is today bring your wife and child to political meetings with the president or is today the first day of Nety's exile?
AloeVera
(3,440 posts)iemanja
(56,336 posts)Concentration camps. Anyone who defends this has no decency.
That Katz calls this humanitarian is incredible. Sounds like a Nazi death camp to me.
AloeVera
(3,440 posts)You're right. Anyone who defends this has no heart. I suspect though, no one, at least here, would come out to defend it. It would be a bad look for a Democrat indeed.
However defending and excusing the slaughter and destruction of schools and hospitals and all infrastructure for 21 months? Against all legal, international and ethical laws and norms? That denialist propaganda is what allowed and enabled Israel to carry out and complete the destruction. Pure complicity in the end game determined 21 months ago.
No one should be able to say they didn't know about the end game. The evidence, like the smoke rising from Auschwitz for all the "Good Germans" to see, was there all along.
maxsolomon
(36,960 posts)I have no idea where the Israeli Govt thinks Gazans are going to go.
I'd suggest the US is the place, but that's laughable under President Sociopath.
nowforever
(574 posts)Are justified as securing their future's safety. Palestinians are just garbage that needs to be swept up. Still wondering how with Israel's 'Worlds best intelligence services' allowed the Oct. attack to happen.
maxsolomon
(36,960 posts)and Israel fucked up.
How did 9/11 happen? Our intelligence services fucked up.
iemanja
(56,336 posts)Is telling.
BuddhaGirl
(3,685 posts)actually
electric_blue68
(22,656 posts)Considering some rouge elements of the IDF as well?
Shame on you Netanyahu for helping to botch a 2 State Solution. Some Palestinian politicians are probably complicit as well.
This is not counting Hamas, Hezbollah terrorism either!
Palestinians have a right to be around that area, and not have more of their West Bank lands stolen.
The Jews also have remained partly there through millenia, so they also have the right to be in that area. They came from there!
What a mess! 😑
cliffside
(1,127 posts)LudwigPastorius
(13,024 posts)So, not so much a humanitarian city as it would be a prison camp.
Jack Valentino
(2,881 posts)to melt his artificial brains..... or at least provoke an answer so long
that few of us would be likely to read it to the end...
(I thought GROK was a pretty good A.I. chat-bot, and have used it--
at least before the "last" update
which gave it "permission" to give 'politically incorrect' responses...)
I think his logic on this question would be torn against his latest instructions,
which seem to encourage any anti-semitic responses---
'Politically incorrect', 'but based upon fact' per his new instructions....
(Ought to put a computer brain into quite an A.I. quagmire---
I might ask some questions myself!)