Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,336 posts)
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 10:29 AM Jun 24

South Dakota Eager for Trump's Statue Garden Near Mount Rushmore Despite Local Opposition

Source: US News and World Report/AP

June 24, 2025, at 12:08 a.m.


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — Officials in South Dakota are pushing hard to build President Donald Trump 's proposed National Garden of American Heroes in the Black Hills near Mount Rushmore, but the effort has sparked a backlash from Indigenous groups who see the area as sacred.

A mining company has offered to donate 40 acres (16 hectares) less than a mile from Mount Rushmore, where massive sculptures of four of the nation's most prominent presidents are carved out of granite.

“The Black Hills mark the perfect location to achieve your vision for the National Garden of American Heroes,” Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden wrote in a letter to Trump. “Together, we will make this project happen in a way that honors America’s heroes, takes advantage of South Dakota’s natural beauty, and incorporates the most iconic monument to our greatest leaders: Mount Rushmore National Memorial.”

But the Black Hills have long been the subject of disputes between South Dakota and its tribes. The 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie recognized that the Black Hills belong to the Sioux people, but the U.S. government seized the land less than a decade later to mine for gold. A 1980 Supreme Court decision found that the U.S. violated the treaty, but the tribes refused the $1.3 billion in compensation they were offered and maintained their rights to the land. Indigenous groups also oppose drilling project

Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2025-06-24/south-dakota-eager-for-trumps-statue-garden-near-mount-rushmore-despite-local-opposition

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
South Dakota Eager for Trump's Statue Garden Near Mount Rushmore Despite Local Opposition (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 24 OP
TOO FAR GONE! Mr.Bee Jun 24 #1
Perfectly understandable DENVERPOPS Jun 24 #8
LOL. "massive sculptures of four of the nation's most prominent presidents" PSPS Jun 24 #2
I'm sure trump will erect his golden statue there so MAGAts can make pilgrimages Bayard Jun 24 #3
There goes the neighborhood. republianmushroom Jun 24 #4
It should be easy to blow up and deface at least one of the sculptures. nt Jit423 Jun 24 #5
Good grief. LisaM Jun 24 #6
He will probably stick all the Confederate statues that have been removed there. mackdaddy Jun 24 #7

DENVERPOPS

(13,003 posts)
8. Perfectly understandable
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 02:24 PM
Jun 24

from the same group that voted for Noem and Trump............And from the tiniest, Piss Ant, State Population in the U.S.

The worst thing is, that in the SENATE, just ONE of their votes of the people represented, from these tiny population states, equals the same weight as THOUSANDS of the people represented in Larger Blue States......

PSPS

(14,750 posts)
2. LOL. "massive sculptures of four of the nation's most prominent presidents"
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 10:58 AM
Jun 24

There is no more prominent president than trump himself. He said so himself! Well, he might include Jefferson Davis but only in diminutive form.

Bayard

(26,169 posts)
3. I'm sure trump will erect his golden statue there so MAGAts can make pilgrimages
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 11:05 AM
Jun 24

The Black Hills were stolen by our government:
"The Great Sioux Reservation, including the Black Hills, was "set apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Indians"[in the Fort Laramie Treaty of April 29, 1868. Those treaties were not upheld by the United States, and the Sioux Nation was eventually forcibly removed. The Supreme Court ruled in 1980 (US v Sioux Nation) that the Sioux Nation never received just compensation for their land, writing "a more ripe and rank case of dishonorable dealings will never, in all probability, be found in our history." The Court concluded that Congress had failed to "makes a good faith effort to give the Indians the full value of the land." The Court ordered "just compensation to the Sioux Nation, and that obligation, including an award of interest, must now, at last, be paid." However, the Sioux Nation refused the monetary award, stating that their goal was return of the land."

They also blackmailed the Sioux:
"United States illegally seized the land and nullified the treaty with the Indian Appropriations Bill of 1876, without the tribe's consent. That bill "denied the Sioux all further appropriation and treaty-guaranteed annuities" until they gave up the Black Hills."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seizure_of_the_Black_Hills

The Black Hills are actually sacred to several tribes. They don't want the $billion+ settlement the Supreme Court gave them--they want their stolen land back! trump's statue will be the latest slap in the face, like the insult of Mt. Rushmore.

LisaM

(29,301 posts)
6. Good grief.
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 01:14 PM
Jun 24

Obviously, Mt. Rushmore is a done deal, but it probably wouldn't - and shouldn't - be built now. The least we can offer in recompense is to respect the area around it.

mackdaddy

(1,803 posts)
7. He will probably stick all the Confederate statues that have been removed there.
Tue Jun 24, 2025, 01:16 PM
Jun 24

Traitors garden seems about right.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»South Dakota Eager for Tr...