Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,336 posts)
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:02 AM Jun 22

The US military used a 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb for the first time in combat in strikes on Iranian nuke sites

Source: Business Insider

Jun 22, 2025, 8:34 AM ET


The US's "massive precision strikes" on three Iranian nuclear facilities unleashed the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-buster bomb for the first time in combat.

In a press briefing Sunday morning, Gen. Dan Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said US forces fired around 75 precision-guided weapons in total during the operation, which targeted facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The weapons included 14 GBU-57s.

The GBU-57, designed to penetrate hardened bunkers, particularly those located deep underground, is among the heaviest and most powerful non-nuclear bombs in the US arsenal.

Here's what we know about them. The GBU-57 weighs roughly 30,000 pounds and can only be carried by the B-2 Spirit bomber. It is approximately 20.5 feet long and has a diameter of 31.5 inches. The US Air Force says the bomb is designed to target "weapons of mass destruction located in well-protected facilities" and can penetrate up to 200 feet below ground before exploding.

Read more: https://www.businessinsider.com/what-we-know-bunker-buster-bombs-us-reportedly-hit-iran-2025-6



That term "bunker buster" has been used for almost 25 years related to Afghanistan and Bin Laden so had to look up what was up with this. Apparently the ones used at Tora Bora, etc., were ~5000 lb ones. This "30,000 lb" one has apparently been around since Shrub and was finally tested in 2015 under Obama (however not needed because we succeeded in getting an agreement that was subsequently blown up by 45) -

U.S. stockpiles powerful bunker-buster bombs in case Iran nuclear talks fail


By W.J. Hennigan
July 3, 2015 3:31 PM PT

Reporting from WASHINGTON — As diplomats rush to reach an agreement to curb Iran’s nuclear program, the U.S. military is stockpiling conventional bombs so powerful that strategists say they could cripple Tehran’s most heavily fortified nuclear complexes, including one deep underground.

The bunker-busting bombs are America’s most destructive munitions short of atomic weapons. At 15 tons, each is 5 tons heavier than any other bomb in the U.S. arsenal. In development for more than a decade, the latest iteration of the MOP — massive ordnance penetrator — was successfully tested on a deeply buried target this year at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. The test followed upgrades to the bomb’s guidance system and electronics to stop jammers from sending it off course.

U.S. officials say the huge bombs, which have never been used in combat, are a crucial element in the White House deterrent strategy and contingency planning should diplomacy go awry and Iran seek to develop a nuclear bomb.

Obama has made it clear that he has no desire to order an attack, warning that U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s air defense network and nuclear facilities would spark a destabilizing new war in the Middle East, and would only delay Iran by several years should it choose to build a bomb. “A military solution will not fix it,” Obama told Israeli TV on June 1. An attack “would temporarily slow down an Iranian nuclear program, but it will not eliminate it.”

(snip)
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US military used a 30,000-pound bunker-buster bomb for the first time in combat in strikes on Iranian nuke sites (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 22 OP
Trump just had to prove that he's the alpha male instead of the historically ignorant fool. Lonestarblue Jun 22 #1
Once these bombs became a big part of the conversation, it was D. Spaulding Jun 22 #2
Trump did something similar in 2017 with a 21,600 lbs MOAB weapon on Afghan caves IronLionZion Jun 22 #5
Gee, I wonder.... ShazzieB Jun 22 #22
The real threat to the US is in the White House or at Taco-lago. twodogsbarking Jun 22 #3
Bunker buster bombs are necessary for at least 3 reasons: ancianita Jun 22 #4
But then Iran has been supplying Russia with weapons (drones, etc) to attack Ukraine BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #6
I see. Makes sense. I've also read that Russia gets some weapons from China, too, and that Russia ancianita Jun 22 #13
China hasn't actually been "at war" with anyone except some border skirmishes here and there and their practice drills BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #15
Exactly. It's more short/long term profitable to be the supplier country than the warring country. ancianita Jun 22 #16
China is busy with their "Belt and Road" initiative BumRushDaShow Jun 22 #17
Yep, that's the name of it. ancianita Jun 22 #18
China profits in the background manicdem Jun 22 #19
Bunker buster bombs are needed to stop Iranian attacks on Israel once and for all, ancianita Jun 22 #7
"once and for all" speak easy Jun 22 #8
Of course, no reprisals or vengeance - Maine-i-ac Jun 22 #12
With B-2 bombers hitting deep underground centrifuges, Israel could at least get some respite from the 15 ancianita Jun 22 #14
Thank you for putting this in perspective question everything Jun 22 #20
Lunatics. Passages Jun 22 #9
He wanted to use nukes, but they wouldn't let him. malthaussen Jun 22 #10
if they build it the war will come stillcool Jun 22 #11
Well strike up the freakin' band and have a parade. The US built a giant bomb and exploded it. twodogsbarking Jun 22 #21

Lonestarblue

(12,840 posts)
1. Trump just had to prove that he's the alpha male instead of the historically ignorant fool.
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:10 AM
Jun 22

A fool who slept through his own second-rate military parade. And actually seems to sleep through most cabinet meetings.

D. Spaulding

(320 posts)
2. Once these bombs became a big part of the conversation, it was
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:15 AM
Jun 22

obvious that any negotiated or diplomatic solution was never going to happen
These are some of the most powerful weapons other than nukes. They have never been used in war before. No President has ever unleashed them
The prospect of wielding such massive lethal force and "obliterating" a mountain stronghold, was just too enticing to someone with a fragile ego, and so self absorbed.

IronLionZion

(49,516 posts)
5. Trump did something similar in 2017 with a 21,600 lbs MOAB weapon on Afghan caves
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:50 AM
Jun 22

so many of us knew he was going to do this with the MOP. The US is the only country with this capability (that we know of) and Trump likes to show off and have military parades and what not. Israel can't do it so they needed the US. So it was inevitable.

ShazzieB

(21,209 posts)
22. Gee, I wonder....
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 03:29 PM
Jun 22
The prospect of wielding such massive lethal force and "obliterating" a mountain stronghold, was just too enticing to someone with a fragile ego, and so self absorbed.


Just the thing to make the teeny weeny mushroom feel much bigger, I'm sure.

Enjoy the sensation while you can, Donnie boy. It won't last long, that I can tell you!

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
4. Bunker buster bombs are necessary for at least 3 reasons:
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:49 AM
Jun 22

Iran supplied the weaponry for the Oct 7 attack;
Iran has historically attacked through its proxies Hamas, Iraq militias, Houthis & Hezbollah, forcing Israel to defend on multiple fronts;
Iran has continued for decades to produce military grade enrichment for a nuclear strike;
Iran has the largest stockpile of long range missiles, several launch sites, and has used them against Israel .

BumRushDaShow

(157,336 posts)
6. But then Iran has been supplying Russia with weapons (drones, etc) to attack Ukraine
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:52 AM
Jun 22

so there might be some maneuvering behind the scenes as Russia needs that stuff.

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
13. I see. Makes sense. I've also read that Russia gets some weapons from China, too, and that Russia
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:41 AM
Jun 22

supplied weapons to Syria in recent years. Geopolitics tends to result in weapons deals making circuitous routes.

BumRushDaShow

(157,336 posts)
15. China hasn't actually been "at war" with anyone except some border skirmishes here and there and their practice drills
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:59 AM
Jun 22

Iran has had several wars over the years with Iraq and has been supplying their surrogates in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen... and of course more recently, Russia. Russia had been getting some somewhat inferior weapons from North Korea but they took what they could get from anyone offering!

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
16. Exactly. It's more short/long term profitable to be the supplier country than the warring country.
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 12:06 PM
Jun 22

China's into "brokering" for trade more than engaging in proxy wars -- as in brokering with both north and south Sudan so China can get a piece of their wealth, in exchange for peace that comes from China's money to repair their tribal lands.

BumRushDaShow

(157,336 posts)
17. China is busy with their "Belt and Road" initiative
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 12:25 PM
Jun 22

basically ingraining themselves on the continent of Africa.

manicdem

(529 posts)
19. China profits in the background
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 01:21 PM
Jun 22

They buy cheap oil from Russia and Iran due to their sanctions, sell "parts" for use in their wars, still have good trade with the western nations, etc...

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
7. Bunker buster bombs are needed to stop Iranian attacks on Israel once and for all,
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 10:53 AM
Jun 22

And for at least four good reasons:

Iran supplied the weaponry for the Oct 7 attacks, and has continued supplies to its proxies;
Iran has historically attacked through its proxies Hamas, Iraq militias, Houthis & Hezbollah, forcing Israel to defend on multiple fronts;
Iran has continued for decades to produce military grade enrichment for a nuclear strike;
Iran has the largest stockpile of long range missiles, several launch sites, and has used them against Israel .

Maine-i-ac

(1,520 posts)
12. Of course, no reprisals or vengeance -
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:35 AM
Jun 22

This time because it's once and for all.
The Iranian people will en masse forgive all this and move on and immediately be democratic and free right?
Or are the same people still in charge and doing the same thing?

ancianita

(41,183 posts)
14. With B-2 bombers hitting deep underground centrifuges, Israel could at least get some respite from the 15
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:50 AM
Jun 22

prolonged attacks its people have suffered for over 76 years. Israel has never in its history attacked these countries.

malthaussen

(18,192 posts)
10. He wanted to use nukes, but they wouldn't let him.
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 11:16 AM
Jun 22

Bank on it. So naturally, he used the biggest bomb he could, probably stroking it lovingly before it was loaded into the strike craft.

-- Mal

twodogsbarking

(14,636 posts)
21. Well strike up the freakin' band and have a parade. The US built a giant bomb and exploded it.
Sun Jun 22, 2025, 03:20 PM
Jun 22

Make it a paid holiday. Somebody give me a cheeseburger.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The US military used a 30...