The U.S. Supreme Court, Legislative Branch, or Judicial Branch in a Tyranny/Dictatorship............

Now that he is throwing his Trumphumping Voters under the bus, having outgrown their usefulness in future "elections", there are many other branches and agencies that are soon to follow........

Sounds like a repig wrote this.

mistake, but in this day and age, I think people are wise to make that assumption.

"...senior Democrat state legal officials—including attorney generals from..."

"...between the Trump administration and Democrat states over the president's power."

These are two instances in which I'm not inclined to give the writer/editor the benefit of the doubt.

because apparently they want to use "Democratic" as an adjective vs a noun (regardless of whether the first letter is capitalized or not).

I wish they wouldn't help normalize this. They think we can't tell between Democratic meaning party vs democratic meaning the qualities of a democracy. But for 200 years we were able to tell by context and don't need to massacre the English language by using a noun for an adjective to clarify. There is an underlying resistance to the inference that the Democratic party is, well, democratic. It is too complementary. Well, yeah, that's how it got it's name. The insistence on not allowing the complement is insulting.

Sorry if this is obvious to all, but since some on our side use it....I wince every time I hear it. We don't complain about Republicans getting the benefit of the adjective in their name, even though they've gone fully fascist on us.

It's whatever their stylebooks claim the should (or could) use.

already there to try something this outlandish.

Which is insane, because there are decades of valid reasons to remove some of these pathetic excuses for SC justices (particularly the ones appointed through highly dubious means and have demonstrated openly corrupt behavior), and I've always been frustrated by the fact that it's almost impossible to do in this system...but now we have someone who would attempt to sack the ones he simply doesn't like, just because he thinks he's a fucking king and they aren't kissing his ass 100% of the fucking time with their rulings.

Why hasn't the orange menace been removed yet.?

Should have pushed, and I mean really pushed, for a larger SC.
But, once again we saw the Democratic party cowering in the corner.
I know it would have been a tough fight, but damnit, he should have tried.

With the filibuster, 60 votes were needed.

But just putting it out there.
We might have shamed enough of the repukes to support it.
I know, I know...but a guy can dream, eh?

It would only hurt them, by adding 4 or so more Biden-appointed liberal Justices. But, one way to have done it would have been to eliminate the filibuster. That may have worked.