Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(161,888 posts)
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 04:19 PM Tuesday

Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times

Source: MSNBC

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lost her defamation retrial against The New York Times over a 2017 editorial she said damaged her reputation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.

The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.

Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to “several major issues” in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year. ....

The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palin’s political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffords’.

But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting “was never established,” as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather “viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: “An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.”)

The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, “This decision is disappointing. We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/sarah-palin-new-york-times-verdict-jury-trial-defamation-case-rcna202362




38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday OP
Will you please just go away now??!! PortTack Tuesday #1
She is long past her "pull date." Botany 20 hrs ago #35
I hope she has to pat their legal fees! SheltieLover Tuesday #2
This message was self-deleted by its author no_hypocrisy Tuesday #3
This message was self-deleted by its author BumRushDaShow Tuesday #4
Looks like her lips are deflating, maybe she needs some extra Botox or something. Blues Heron Tuesday #5
Another Repug gets a dose of Due Process. Sneederbunk Tuesday #6
She needs to take a long pageant walk . . . SarcasticSatyr Tuesday #7
Yes! Martin68 Tuesday #8
Cry me a river! Tarzanrock Tuesday #9
How does one damage Sarah palins reputation? BOSSHOG Tuesday #10
Seriously. She does such a good job at it all by herself. mdbl Tuesday #15
You could claim she once Rincewind 20 hrs ago #36
Ha ha ha. Again. Wild blueberry Tuesday #11
So Sad.... johnnyplankton Tuesday #12
lol... Sue yourself, Palin... You're the one who's Cha Tuesday #13
Who is this "Sarah Palin" person? AverageOldGuy Tuesday #14
I may be wrong but----- lastlib Tuesday #17
Translation: She's off the gravy train and strapped for cash live love laugh Tuesday #16
Wow, what happened to her face? She should be suing her plastic surgeon, not NYT. nt SunSeeker Tuesday #18
It's either the plastic surgery, or just the inner ugliness coming to the surface. Aristus Tuesday #19
Jeebus, what a waste of time. Who the hell paid her jerkwad lawyers? We know washed-up Barbie didn't. Red Raider 85 Tuesday #20
Failin Palin is making progress--she Hassler Tuesday #21
She has the morals of Lauren Boebert, the graceful manners of Marjorie Greene, the intelligent wit struggle4progress Tuesday #22
It's weird that she is still around. Gore1FL Tuesday #23
Well that was fast. LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #24
Won't someone rid me of .... Mustellus Tuesday #25
Jeez, that's gonna make a mama bear chew her lipsick tryin' to make the mortgage payment in Wasilla. marble falls Tuesday #26
There must be a job flippin burgers in Wasilly... wcmagumba Tuesday #27
Is that dark upper lip liner, BidenRocks Tuesday #28
I wondered the same UpInArms 15 hrs ago #37
My question is who is bank rolling here trials? Jacson6 Tuesday #29
Poor Mooselini... LudwigPastorius Tuesday #30
Hilarious! wolfie001 21 hrs ago #34
This was her big chance to refudiate their coverage Orrex Tuesday #31
Just stopping into REC THIS AKwannabe Yesterday #32
Now get lost bird brain! oasis Yesterday #33
This made me smile LetMyPeopleVote 11 hrs ago #38

Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #3)

Martin68

(25,509 posts)
8. Yes!
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 04:59 PM
Tuesday

One wonders if she'll figure out that it's best to stop digging when you're stuck in a hole.

Tarzanrock

(710 posts)
9. Cry me a river!
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:00 PM
Tuesday

What a pity! The jury deliberated for "about two hours" before telling that idiot Nazi bitch that she had no case. It takes a minimum of an hour in a jury room to choose the foreperson. That jury took one vote and kicked her sorry, lying ass to the curb. Looks like that jury also didn't agree with that stupid appellate court ruling either and this jury made a factual determination that the NY Times publication was not "“viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness[.]" as that goofy appellate court erroneously and improperly determined. This is a real bitch slap to that appellate court ruling.

AverageOldGuy

(2,540 posts)
14. Who is this "Sarah Palin" person?
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:21 PM
Tuesday

Seems as though I heard the name long ago but don't recall anything about her.

lastlib

(25,765 posts)
17. I may be wrong but-----
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:34 PM
Tuesday

I think she somehow got some publicity as John McCain's coffee girl?

I don't understand it, either......

Aristus

(69,710 posts)
19. It's either the plastic surgery, or just the inner ugliness coming to the surface.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:44 PM
Tuesday

n/t

Red Raider 85

(133 posts)
20. Jeebus, what a waste of time. Who the hell paid her jerkwad lawyers? We know washed-up Barbie didn't.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:59 PM
Tuesday

struggle4progress

(122,818 posts)
22. She has the morals of Lauren Boebert, the graceful manners of Marjorie Greene, the intelligent wit
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:28 PM
Tuesday

of Karoline Leavitt, and the personal warmth of Kristi Noem: it's such a surprise she's not more popular

LetMyPeopleVote

(161,888 posts)
24. Well that was fast.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:40 PM
Tuesday

It did not take long for the jury to find against Palin. Given that the first hour of deliberations involved things like picking a foreman and reading instructions, this was indeed fast



Mustellus

(374 posts)
25. Won't someone rid me of ....
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:46 PM
Tuesday

.... these congresspersons. Henry II, paraphrased.

( Henry II, founder of stochastic terrorism. Two knights took him up on it, they killed Thomas a Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. Coming back, expecting a reward, Henry had them executed for murder. Neat and clean....)

marble falls

(64,813 posts)
26. Jeez, that's gonna make a mama bear chew her lipsick tryin' to make the mortgage payment in Wasilla.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:49 PM
Tuesday

wcmagumba

(3,846 posts)
27. There must be a job flippin burgers in Wasilly...
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:58 PM
Tuesday

Grab that job Sarah, sure they'll train you up...and where's the rest of your freaky family these days?

Jacson6

(1,151 posts)
29. My question is who is bank rolling here trials?
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 09:27 PM
Tuesday

She said she didn't want monetary damages and attorneys don't work for free.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sarah Palin loses defamat...