Supreme Court to hear challenge to Obamacare rule on free preventive care
Source: NBC News
April 18, 2025, 5:00 AM EDT
The Supreme Court on Monday is set to hear arguments in a case challenging a provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires private insurers to cover health care screenings, tests and checkups for free. Experts say the courts ruling in the case, called Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, could have sweeping consequences for patient access to preventive health care across the United States.
Since the ACA was passed in 2010, most insurers have had to cover a wide range of prevention services at no cost to patients including cancer screenings, mammograms, statins for heart disease and HIV prevention medications.
About 150 million people are currently enrolled in private health insurance plans that cover free prevention services, according to KFF, a nonpartisan group that researches health policy issues. A KFF analysis found that 1 in 20 people about 10 million people received at least one prevention service in 2019.
This is a really crucial case, said Arthur Caplan, the head of the division of medical ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, noting that many Americans say they cant afford the high out-of-pocket cost of medical care. The price will be paid in dead bodies if the court rules against.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/obamacare-supreme-court-preventative-care-challenge-rcna201794
15 years later and they are STILL trying to kill the ACA, one piece at a time. But then it's been 60 years since the establishment of Medicare and 90 years since the establishment of Social Security, and we see how viciously they have attacked those, so...


Native
(7,064 posts)for all involved. This has been proven time & time again.
Henry203
(515 posts)who bring these suits. I hate them.
GreenWave
(11,084 posts)tulipsandroses
(7,186 posts)White men are great thoughts are not enough to make a nation great. All these folks that are trying to dismantle everything are despicable.
LittleGirl
(8,663 posts)Citizens or Insurance companies. I just had a colonoscopy yesterday and they removed 3 polyps. I have to redo this in 2 years because of the risk factor in my family. I am tired of Congress taking away my healthcare needs when I just got Medicare 6 months ago! Come on. I have a cataract that is forming and they don't even cover some of those treatments. And the cost of 2 pairs of glasses, one sunglasses was well over 450 bucks! And they aren't fancy ones either, they are lined bifocals that fit my face. I also need hearing aids as my risk factor for deafness is also coming of age.
This is life and death stuff. If I can't see, I can't live. If I have colon cancer, I can't pay anymore taxes. I've paid into Medicare and Social Security since 1976. I want my healthcare finally. 49 years I've paid for healthcare for someone else and now they want to take it away? Let me just say, over my dead body.
IbogaProject
(4,284 posts)Whom is hurt by this policy?
alarimer
(17,144 posts)We pay the fucking premiums so they are not FREE. All "free" means here is that they can't charge you co-pays for it. But we are paying through the nose in other ways.
Why does anyone object to these things being covered? The insurance companies being out a bit more money makes me happy actually.
mackdaddy
(1,750 posts)I agree that words matter.
hlthe2b
(109,236 posts)than this constant dismantling of EVERYTHING that makes life possible.
Gawd I hate them...
AllyCat
(17,837 posts)And this SCROTUS is going to give them what they want.
bmichaelh
(781 posts)A lot of these tests are only free under certain conditions.
For example, my employer's insurance would pay 100% of a colonoscopy except in the case of biopsies.
That being said, its better to have a coloscopy than being treated for colon cancer later.
A lot of these prescreening tests save costs in the long run and save lives.
Grins
(8,258 posts)Whos PAYING them to go to court?