Facebook Pushes Its Llama 4 AI Model to the Right, Wants to Present "Both Sides"
Source: 404 Media
-snip-
In a blog post about the release of Llama 4, Metas open weights AI model, the company clearly states that bias is a problem its trying to address, but unlike mountains of research which established AI systems are more likely to discriminate against minorities based on race, gender, and nationality, Meta is specifically concerned with Llama 4 having a left-leaning political bias.
Its well-known that all leading LLMs have had issues with biasspecifically, they historically have leaned left when it comes to debated political and social topics, Meta said in its blog. This is due to the types of training data available on the internet.
Our goal is to remove bias from our AI models and to make sure that Llama can understand and articulate both sides of a contentious issue, Meta continues. As part of this work, were continuing to make Llama more responsive so that it answers questions, can respond to a variety of different viewpoints without passing judgment, and doesn't favor some views over others.
Meta then lists a few improvements in Llama 4, including that the model will now less often refuse to engage users who ask about political and social topics overall, that it is dramatically more balanced with which prompts it refuses to respond to, and favorably compares its lack of a strong political lean to Grok, xAIs LLM which Elon Musk continually promotes as a non-woke, based alternative to comparable products from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.404media.co/facebook-pushes-its-llama-4-ai-model-to-the-right-wants-to-present-both-sides/
Waiting for Zuck to add a Trump-approved portrait and a link to donate to a Trump PAC to every Facebook page to prove his "lack of bias."
And FWIW, despite Musk's hope that Grok would be completely RW, there's still enough reality in the training data that Grok continues to identify Elon Musk as spreading the most misinformation on Twitter, followed by Trump and RFK Jr. Musk tried to change that briefly by having the bot ordered not to consider articles about Musk and Trump, but that order was discovered and then deleted.

mdbl
(6,269 posts)Just because someone doesn't think you should just let them die instead of providing healthcare doesn't mean they're biased. Another reason I don't use Fakebook/Meta/Instagram
It is not about conservative vs liberal or right vs left, it is about right and wrong. As such, "wrong" is not entitled to equal time and exposure as "right".
Of course in Meta world, it is about numbers and profit, not morality or principles. Whatever draws the most users and clicks. Disgusting people.
LiberalArkie
(17,991 posts)xocetaceans
(4,137 posts)...all acknowledge that instead of pretending that their models actually "understand" or "articulate" anything. "Articulation" implies that there is some "thought" behind what is being expressed. As far as is what is currently evidenced, AI is not "thinking", "understanding", or "articulating" anything. Currently, AI is merely something like a Frankencomplete's monster.
Quanto Magnus
(1,111 posts)is just them admitting they want to push Trumps fascist agenda