Democrats press law firms on deals with Trump
Source: msn/The Hill
11h
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) are pressing the White House and six top law firms about alleged deals struck with the Trump administration to avoid getting targeted by executive orders for hiring lawyers and representing clients whom the president does not like.
In the letter to White House counsel David Warrington, Blumenthal and Raskin — the top Democrats on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and the House Judiciary Committee, respectively — noted that President Trump has targeted five law firms in recent weeks in executive orders that explicitly detail “his personal grievances which led to its issuance.”
“The retaliatory nature of these executive orders has not been even tacitly disguised,” the lawmakers wrote in their letter, noting that the orders have targeted firms with connections to cases against Trump or lawyers connected to those cases. “This unprecedented abuse of executive power to settle personal scores is part of a broader effort by President Trump to use the powers of the presidency to intimidate and silence his perceived enemies,” they added.
Blumenthal and Raskin wrote that the orders have tried to punish the firms by revoking attorneys’ security clearances, barring them from federal buildings, terminating any government contracts, and preventing them from seeking further government employment.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-press-law-firms-on-deals-with-trump/ar-AA1CyE3X
Link to Senators Blumenthal and Raskin LETTER (PDF) - https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025-4-6-Blumenthal-Raskin-Letter-to-Milbank.pdf
(just as a FYI note - when you see reports of what are dubbed "sternly worded letters", most are actually REQUESTING INFORMATION from the recipients of those letters, with due dates)
= new reply since forum marked as read
or is that new to you? 
They request info "nicely" and most comply. If they need more, they will send another letter to request more and/or clarifications to what was sent. But if the request is ignored, then they will send another letter referencing the previous request and asking "nicely" again if they could get that info. If that continues to be ignored, then they start escalating.
At that point, the subpoenas start happening, although with Democrats in the minority, the majority GOP would probably not allow it, BUT depending on the subject (in the rare cases of "bipartisan" agreement), they might.
Would you rather them sit there and just talk during hearings broadcast on the CSPANs and then off to the liquid lunch?
But that is not unexpected. 
My POINT was to say that these LETTERS are not just "scolding" but are ALSO "requests for information" but you prefer to be contrarian for whatever reason.
