Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnyone interested can read the full declassified report on foreign threats to the 2020 election
Mark Warner @MarkWarnerFor anyone interested in doing their own research before Trumps speech tonight you can read the full declassified report on foreign threats to the 2020 election here. There was NO foreign interference in the 2020 election.
x.com/MarkWarner/status/2077818258233729039

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ICA-declass-16MAR21.pdf
Key Judgment 1: We have no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the
voting process in the 2020 US elections, including voter registration, casting ballots, vote tabulation, or reporting
results. We assess that it would be difficult for a foreign actor to manipulate election processes at scale without
detection by intelligence collection on the actors themselves, through physical and cyber security monitoring around
voting systems across the country, or in post-election audits. The IC identified some successful compromises of state
and local government networks prior to Election Dayas well as a higher volume of unsuccessful attemptsthat we
assess were not directed at altering election processes. Some foreign actors, such as Iran and Russia, spread false or
inflated claims about alleged compromises of voting systems to undermine public confidence in election processes and
results.
Key Judgment 2: We assess that Russian President Putin authorized, and a range of Russian government
organizations conducted, influence operations aimed at denigrating President Bidens candidacy and the
Democratic Party, supporting former President Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral process,
and exacerbating sociopolitical divisions in the US. Unlike in 2016, we did not see persistent Russian cyber efforts
to gain access to election infrastructure. We have high confidence in our assessment; Russian state and proxy actors
who all serve the Kremlins interests worked to affect US public perceptions in a consistent manner. A key element of
Moscows strategy this election cycle was its use of proxies linked to Russian intelligence to push influence
narrativesincluding misleading or unsubstantiated allegations against President Bidento US media
organizations, US officials, and prominent US individuals, including some close to former President Trump and
his administration.
Key Judgment 3: We assess that Iran carried out a multi-pronged covert influence campaign intended to undercut
former President Trumps reelection prospectsthough without directly promoting his rivalsundermine public
confidence in the electoral process and US institutions, and sow division and exacerbate societal tensions in the
US. We have high confidence in this assessment. We assess that Supreme Leader Khamenei authorized the campaign
and Irans military and intelligence services implemented it using overt and covert messaging and cyber operations.
Key Judgment 4: We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts and considered but did not deploy
influence efforts intended to change the outcome of the US Presidential election. We have high confidence in this
judgment. China sought stability in its relationship with the United States, did not view either election outcome as
being advantageous enough for China to risk getting caught meddling, and assessed its traditional influence tools
primarily targeted economic measures and lobbyingwould be sufficient to meet its goal of shaping US China policy
regardless of the winner. The NIO for Cyber assesses, however, that China did take some steps to try to undermine
former President Trumps reelection.
Key Judgment 5: We assess that a range of additional foreign actorsincluding Lebanese Hizballah, Cuba, and
Venezuelatook some steps to attempt to influence the election. In general, we assess that they were smaller in scale
than the influence efforts conducted by other actors this election cycle. Cybercriminals disrupted some election
preparations; we judge their activities probably were driven by financial motivations.
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ICA-declass-16MAR21.pdf
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone interested can read the full declassified report on foreign threats to the 2020 election (Original Post)
bigtree
7 hrs ago
OP
Well, the list of those trying to influence voters against TSF include all his favorite 'enemies': Iran, Cuba,
sinkingfeeling
5 hrs ago
#3
ultralite001
(2,911 posts)1. Me!!! Me!!! Me!!!
I'm all in...
Thank you for sharing...
Raven123
(8,112 posts)2. Thanks for the post and link
I wonder how Congress will respond if Trump reveals still- classified information in his speech. Once he speaks its no longer classified, but will they be able to respond without declassifying some themselves, which I dont think they can do legally.
sinkingfeeling
(58,415 posts)3. Well, the list of those trying to influence voters against TSF include all his favorite 'enemies': Iran, Cuba,
Lebanese Hezballah, and Venezula. Wonder if there's a connection to those and his DOD's plans to invade, bomb, and kidnap/kill leaders.
bigtree
(94,763 posts)4. I heard he's going to accuse China
...which is fricking weird because he's always sweating the Chinese leader as his best friend.