General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawyer issues major warning as ex-Olympian David Hearn pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism case
Former Olympian David Hearn, 67, stirred controversy after being charged with felony destruction of property in connection with damage to the iconic Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. On July 9, he pleaded not guilty to the charge. According to prosecutors, Hearn, who was riding near the memorial, ripped out a significant portion of the lining at the bottom of the pool, allegedly causing about $1,000 in damage.
The Reflecting Pool has been undergoing renovations as part of President Trumps restoration efforts. The alleged damage also drew criticism from President Trump. Following Hearns not guilty plea, his attorney argued that the case could set a significant legal precedent.
Former Olympians Lawyer Issues Statement
Former Olympic canoeist David Hearns attorney, Norm Eisen, spoke with reporters after his client pleaded not guilty to the vandalism charges. Eisen argued that the accusation was baseless and warned that the case could set a dangerous legal precedent. He also argued that Hearns indictment was an attempt by the government to make him a scapegoat for its own failures.
In his words, If Mr. Hearn can be charged with a felony for touching the reflecting pool, every American is at risk, and every American should be alarmed about this prosecution. This indictment reflects the administrations effort to scapegoat Davey and to shift blame for their own failures. We will litigate these issues vigorously. We have confidence in our justice system to see through this misuse of government power against an ordinary American based on a false and politicised narrative.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/lawyer-issues-major-warning-as-ex-olympian-david-hearn-pleads-not-guilty-in-reflecting-pool-vandalism-case/ar-AA27XYy9
lame54
(40,558 posts)FakeNoose
(43,475 posts)PJMcK
(25,282 posts)dem4decades
(14,780 posts)no_hypocrisy
(55,951 posts)" (E)very American is at risk, and every American should be alarmed about this prosecution."
canetoad
(21,365 posts)Who the judge is?
Brother Buzz
(40,747 posts)canetoad
(21,365 posts)I haven't heard of her.
Bluetus
(3,456 posts)I would have liked to see a veiled threat along the lines of "This is obviously a malicious prosecution by a corrupted Department of Justice. We intend to litigate it vigorously, including aggressive discovery that reveals the extent of that corruption. In the end, don't be surprised to see every lawyer involved in prosecution to find themselves working in a different profession."
Johonny
(26,947 posts)This is completely bad faith. Hopefully it never reaches a trial.
warmfeet
(3,372 posts)much worse than the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic. I hope we all survive.
AverageOldGuy
(4,456 posts)Charges must first go to a grand jury that votes yes/no there is reason to indict.
If indicted, then it goes to trial where 12 citizens must decide guilty/not guilty.
This is in DC federal court; thus the jurors will be DC residents.
In several such ridiculous cases, the grand jury has refused to indict, or the trial jury laughs the prosecution out of the courtroom.
The US Federal Attorney for DC is "Judge Boxwine Pirro, of Fox fame. Recently several juries have slapped her down. In one case, a grand juror was interviewed after the grand jury refused to indict and he said the entire grand jury laughed at the federal prosecutor.
reACTIONary
(7,487 posts)... by a grand jury. So we are already past that gate.