Those cancer sticks will take your (Xavier) Breath away!

Not even as a 10-year-old sneaking one behind Grandad's shed. Never appealed to me. I had so many relatives that smoked that I'm guessing that's what turned me off of it.

Not once. Never appealed to me in any way. I'm grateful that I was able to avoid it.

After that, you did NOT want to light up around him

the smell of cigarette smoke is nauseating to me.

Come on, this is offensive in so many ways. This is not Democratic Party I want to be a part of. It is about qualifications. FDR was in a wheelchair so I am guessing not very manly man.

Women who fit the equal mold as the men.

Because it kinda seems like the country as a whole to me, and not the party given that 2 of the last 3 nominees have been women.

But the country doesn’t want to.

Which is why it’s odd you seem to be laying the “women need not apply” label on the party.

“There’s nothing wrong with being masculine,” Poindexter told me. It’s okay, he said, to be “a manly man.”

I know, fairy tale thinking! I'm an optimist!

And to me, defeating the MAGA is ALL that matters. However we can do it & whoever needs to temporarily take a seat Take the "tough guy/gal" image away from them.

“Adios Johnny Bravo” When a talent agent signs Greg to become a rock star named "Johnny Bravo," he lets his new fame get to his head, until he discovers that he was only signed because he "fit the suit."

How about we look towards integrity and truthfulness? Manly, macho.....no thanks

The headline had me chuckling. We see articles like this from time to time.
And I don't know if what they're saying is a coincidence or a trend.

So, if we're gonna have manly-men, make them hot too.
Will hot translate into electablility?

Too bad Bollywood actor John Abraham isn't available.

He lives in the wrong country.



Odds are, he will go into politics in India. Lots of celebs in India go into politics.

ETA: I read the article. The article references Johnny Garcia. I am familiar with the race. Johnny Garcia ran against John Lira and Maureen Galindo in the primary. Maureen was that flaky sex therapist, anti-sematism candidate, who received national attention.

I'm surprised John Lira didn't do that in the primary, but it is what it is. It is a fairly conservative district. I think Johnny Garcia has a better chance than John Lira. John Lira's a great guy, but not a very good campaigner. I don't think there was any effort to put a "manly man" in there. Johnny Garcia worked for the sheriff's dept. Our sheriff is popular here. A good chunk of this new district was formally Henry Cuellar's district. It's red leaning.

"Take the 'tough guy/gal' image away from them."

Like bloated, shuffling Piggy, half dead (or fully) McConnell, mummified Grassley, etc. and their incel cult are tough guys?

Not my idea of tough guys.

But this is!

?resize=980

People here posted about it & got hammered for being negative.

It is always about sex. We’ve seen ads our entire lives manipulating that primal human need. Like it or not.
It’s what Clinton and Obama had/have.

Clinton was more like, "Down to earth guy at McDonald's with a twinkle in eye"

We're so superficial in this country. However, my post above states that lots of Bollywood actors transition into Indian politics. Heck, they continue to be in movies while they're serving in India's parliament. So maybe it isn't just the US.

The problem is far too many voters don’t find it offensive – it’s how women lost the right to reproductive autonomy, which is even more offensive.

Women are the afterthought, i.e., "oh yeah, women too."

*sigh*

“Just win, baby.”

I dont know why it's so hard to see the forest.
Just win baby

That one didn't work out too good either.

lol 🙄

Because of Fetterman and Platner “men need not apply”? Is that your point? 🤷‍♂️

I should pay any attention to him? Second, the misogyny in the Atlantic article is disgusting. "manly man" (with no table manners, apparently) is now openly THE criterion in the Democratic party? A throwback to some semi-mythical, longed-for time of male supremacy? Seriously?

Right now, the song "Ladies" sung by woodrow wilson in "SUFFS: The Musical" is playing in my head. The misogyny of his thinking apparently has not gone away.

I don't think we need a chest beater to win.

masculine?

Because in my eyes a manly man does not have to be a bully to prove strength, actually it proves weakness and the Republican Party have a lot of them. Just look at shithole and Vance and the list is long.

Talarico explained it well beginning with caring.

manly men are sure not republicans at all.

Manly men are the likes of Obama, Biden, Carter, Clinton, and to date, Talarico, Brown, Cooper, Newsom, Waltz, and many more. Because they show compassion.

We do need someone who is more fiery.

Amd it's a myth that women and minorities aren't allowed to be mad. It depends on what you're mad about.

Researchers at NYU tried to show that a woman who behaves like Trump does would be hated, but it backfired. They actually loved her.

It's very red but our own Sherrod Brown has been successful winning this district in the past and hopefully Ohio as a whole will be returning Brown back to the Senate.

This manly man stuff is the work of Morris Katz and Fight Agency. Yes, that Morris Katz. It seems silly because most voters are looking for plans and policy. MAGA are the ones obsessed with the manly man stuff. But if this ploy for wooing the MAGA who are looking for manly men works in this very red Republican Trumpy district I'll take it. Just don't push this manly man stuff all over the country and we're good.

of the kind of steady, professional leadership that actually delivers results. Central Casting candidates at the expense of education, experience, insight, and behavior seems simply another variation compelling us to reduce standards of candidates in a race to the bottom with the GOP.

is stuck in my brains now.

Now it's in mine!

nt

🤮

is America's idea of a "manly man" dem candidate? Almost went full George Costanza here.

Anyway...

Coming across as a "manly man" is just irritating.

And it helps to spell out what being a "manly man" would entail. A candidate who isn't polite? A candidate who hunts animals for fun? One with a military background? One who is boisterous, loud?

From my experience, "manly men" don't often have stellar histories, as Platner has shown.

So far from what I have seen of him, James Talarico has come across as gentle and able to express himself well. And Jon Ossoff also is able to resonate with voters. Others here who know more about them may later disabuse me of my positive notions of these two candidates, but as of right now they seem to be the kind of candidates we can use.