Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTom Friedman's NYT opinion piece . . .
. . . lays bare the truth about Trump's disaster in iran. May be behind a paywall.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/26/opinion/iran-deal-trump-us.html
Only two questions remain regarding the U.S. war with Iran. One, how big a plate of crow will President Trump have to eat to end this conflict with at least some achievements? And two, will he tell us the crow hes eating is lobster or filet mignon?
Personally, I am fine if Trump has to eat a pile of crow for instance, the unconditional surrender of Iran that he promised will not be coming his way if it results in Iran relinquishing its roughly 1,000 pounds of near weapons-grade uranium. It would take the immediate threat of an Iranian bomb off the table, and that would be a very good thing.
But please spare me the nonsense that Trump has secured a perfect and delicious deal. Because securing that highly enriched uranium will not only leave the vile, murderous Islamic republic regime in power (and still holding some 10 tons of low-enriched uranium) but actually strengthen it in troubling ways.
For starters, Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio will all be remembered as the team that gave the Islamic republic a second lease on life just when it was more on the ropes than ever with its own people.
Personally, I am fine if Trump has to eat a pile of crow for instance, the unconditional surrender of Iran that he promised will not be coming his way if it results in Iran relinquishing its roughly 1,000 pounds of near weapons-grade uranium. It would take the immediate threat of an Iranian bomb off the table, and that would be a very good thing.
But please spare me the nonsense that Trump has secured a perfect and delicious deal. Because securing that highly enriched uranium will not only leave the vile, murderous Islamic republic regime in power (and still holding some 10 tons of low-enriched uranium) but actually strengthen it in troubling ways.
For starters, Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio will all be remembered as the team that gave the Islamic republic a second lease on life just when it was more on the ropes than ever with its own people.
Because Trump and his national security team did no apparent scenario planning before the war relying only on promises by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel that the Iranian regime would fall like a house of cards after a few weeks of heavy bombing they failed to anticipate what Iran might do with its back against the wall.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tom Friedman's NYT opinion piece . . . (Original Post)
AverageOldGuy
5 hrs ago
OP
Right. Who installed and propped up the Shah whose brutal regime led to the ayatollahs?
Ritabert
4 hrs ago
#4
Danmel
(5,810 posts)1. Here is a gift link
LuvLoogie
(8,944 posts)3. If Iran is ruled by a vile, murderous regime,
I can't help but notice the fingers that are curled back and pointing at ourselves and the vile, murderous regimes we instill/promote/prop up.
Ritabert
(2,639 posts)4. Right. Who installed and propped up the Shah whose brutal regime led to the ayatollahs?