Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OldBaldy1701E

(11,624 posts)
Tue May 26, 2026, 09:09 AM Yesterday

Umm... WTF is this?

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/8-democrats-pass-bill-forcing-teachers-to-out-trans-students_n_6a0f2d3ee4b084c012e3b6d4


Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Donald Davis (N.C.), Cleo Fields (La.), Laura Gillen (N.Y.), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Marcy Kaptur (Ohio), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.) and Eugene Vindman (Va.) all voted for this bill.



What’s more, three of those Democrats — Gillen, Gluesenkamp Perez and Vindman — are members of the Congressional Equality Caucus, which advocates for LGBTQ+ rights.


The Republican bill they just supported, the Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act, requires elementary and middle schools to get parental consent before changing a student’s pronouns or preferred names on any school forms, or for making gender-based accommodations for things like locker rooms or bathrooms.



It also bars teachers from talking about transgender people or issues in the classroom, which means books that include transgender characters or that address the existence of transgender people would be banned. It would also ban LGBTQ+ school groups.


I swear, Don Davis is going to singlehandedly flip that area to red for the first time since 1972, and that was a one off!

IDIOTS!
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Umm... WTF is this? (Original Post) OldBaldy1701E Yesterday OP
Wow. WTAF? PittBlue Yesterday #1
This is so frustrating. Why can't they just leave people alone? LoisB Yesterday #2
They were Indoctrinated by their sponsors. dave99 Yesterday #4
Yes, that's the real indoctrination. LoisB 22 hrs ago #31
My Grand daughter in kindergarten crud Yesterday #3
Maybe it's time for parents to give newborns the middle name "You" Attilatheblond Yesterday #5
It sounds to me like teachers are afraid of being fired if the parents don't give permission FakeNoose Yesterday #6
I must have misread the op orangecrush Yesterday #7
Because some parents can't handle their kid being trans EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #9
Nope. ShazzieB Yesterday #12
Public School Teachers, Counselors, and Administrators Operate Under... ColoringFool Yesterday #13
I can't subscribe to that interpretation. Mad_Machine76 Yesterday #20
In Ohio our representatives were attempting to make women going braless in T shirts illegal!! Hope22 Yesterday #8
They Would Have Had Many Job Applicants! 😉😛🧐😳 ColoringFool Yesterday #14
Yes so many.... Hope22 Yesterday #16
Whatever heppened to... Totally Tunsie Yesterday #10
The School Building Is A State Unto Itself When It Comes To..... ColoringFool Yesterday #15
ColoringFool's Law: "If It's A Republican Idea, It's Bad." I Was..... ColoringFool Yesterday #11
MAGA'S modus operandi is to attack B.See Yesterday #17
*Transgender People* Mad_Machine76 Yesterday #21
Is this bill likely to die in the Senate? ShazzieB Yesterday #18
Maybe Dems are tired of getting the shit kicked out of them when they suport 0.00001% of the population maxrandb Yesterday #19
There is no justification for this garbage. Mad_Machine76 Yesterday #22
It's .6-1.2%, actually. Quite a bit more than are, say, coal miners. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #23
Politicians aren't losing elections for supporting coal miners maxrandb Yesterday #27
So, people should suffer and die in the name of making sure we don't endanger the infrastructure. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #28
Of course not maxrandb Yesterday #30
"Not one single one of the issues... would be a frickin' issue if Dems held the majority!" OldBaldy1701E 7 hrs ago #32
I guess it depends on what you define as real change maxrandb 3 hrs ago #33
Thank you. It's politics. betsuni Yesterday #24
Fuck any lawmakwer who speaks against or votes against trans rights. TheProle Yesterday #25
Here is the bill on congress.gov mahina Yesterday #26
"Maybe Dems are tired of getting the shit kicked out of them when they suport 0.00001% of the population" J_William_Ryan Yesterday #29

PittBlue

(4,836 posts)
1. Wow. WTAF?
Tue May 26, 2026, 09:13 AM
Yesterday

They have nothing better to do? The country is falling apart and this is their concern?

crud

(1,283 posts)
3. My Grand daughter in kindergarten
Tue May 26, 2026, 10:20 AM
Yesterday

Has "change your name" day at school today...everyone chooses a different name and uses it all day. Sounds like fun! Oh well...we can't have that! say the creepy creeps who always think creepy things.

Attilatheblond

(9,298 posts)
5. Maybe it's time for parents to give newborns the middle name "You"
Tue May 26, 2026, 10:44 AM
Yesterday

I can think of several fun first names to go with that.

FakeNoose

(42,533 posts)
6. It sounds to me like teachers are afraid of being fired if the parents don't give permission
Tue May 26, 2026, 10:52 AM
Yesterday

Why should teachers lose their jobs if the parents and their own children can't communicate with one another? The teachers shouldn't be taking sides anyway, and that's what has been happening.

This bill sounds like it is meant to save the teachers from being fired ... and it puts the onus on parents and their kids to agree on the basic principle: Yes they are trans or no they aren't trans. School principals and counselors need to step up also.

I can actually see why Democrats would support this bill.

ShazzieB

(22,924 posts)
12. Nope.
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:19 PM
Yesterday

I CANNOT see why Democrats would support this bill, and I am deeply disappointed in all those who did.

ColoringFool

(1,159 posts)
13. Public School Teachers, Counselors, and Administrators Operate Under...
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:21 PM
Yesterday

The same laws, by law.

Mad_Machine76

(25,020 posts)
20. I can't subscribe to that interpretation.
Tue May 26, 2026, 01:53 PM
Yesterday

No Democrat should give their endorsement of this transphobic garbage. Republicans are going to do what they’re are going to do but Democrats don’t have to be a part of it. I really want to know why Democrats in the EQUALITY CAUCUS supported this!

Hope22

(4,903 posts)
8. In Ohio our representatives were attempting to make women going braless in T shirts illegal!!
Tue May 26, 2026, 11:58 AM
Yesterday

All tied in with other trans laws. They are absolutely sick sick people!! It may have passed but I haven’t been arrested yet!!

Hope22

(4,903 posts)
16. Yes so many....
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:33 PM
Yesterday

But if the law were mandatory jockeying stamps…..not so many!😁🤣 lol…..jock straps auto correct 😂😁

Totally Tunsie

(12,066 posts)
10. Whatever heppened to...
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:06 PM
Yesterday

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

ColoringFool

(1,159 posts)
15. The School Building Is A State Unto Itself When It Comes To.....
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:30 PM
Yesterday

Children's "rights."

Pretty much we find this out in Kindergarten, the first time we're admonished for talking.

Or maybe that was just me! 🤭 🤫

ColoringFool

(1,159 posts)
11. ColoringFool's Law: "If It's A Republican Idea, It's Bad." I Was.....
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:16 PM
Yesterday

Going to specify per law as to "For Americans" or "For Education," but then realized.....

EVERYTHING REPUBLICAN IS BAD OR WORSE, PERIOD.

THIS LAW HAS SEEN AN EXCEPTION EXTREMELY RARELY, TO MY MEMORY THE LAST TIME'S BEING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ORIGIN UNDER NIXON.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••
VERY disappointed in VINDMAN especially!! WTH?!

B.See

(8,905 posts)
17. MAGA'S modus operandi is to attack
Tue May 26, 2026, 12:36 PM
Yesterday

Last edited Wed May 27, 2026, 04:15 PM - Edit history (1)

who and what they see as easy targets to accomplish a more despicably sinister objective.

Transgenders to discriminate against the LGBTQ community,

late term abortion to outlaw all forms of birth control,

DEI to discriminate against Blacks, women and other minorites,

fake claims of voter fraud to suppress the vote and re-establish Jim Crow,

so-called violent immigrants to deport and disappear Black and brown people,

and to end birthright citizenship,

while spending millions to import white Afrikaners.

And so-called sex and violence in literature to remove books from libraries - to obliterate Black history, obscure fascism, and promote their ignorantly deluded false narrative via the suppression of or rewriting of their OWN violent history.

An insidious indoctrination, inspired by fascists, supremacists, and other associated HELLSPAWN.

ShazzieB

(22,924 posts)
18. Is this bill likely to die in the Senate?
Tue May 26, 2026, 01:05 PM
Yesterday

I freaking hope so. If it does, I'm still going to side eye those Democrats who voted for it, very hard, but man, I really hope so.

Some of these people sound like they don't live in reality. Yes, of course, full and open communication between home and school is ideal, but there are times when that's just not safe, because some parents suck. Keeping kids safe should come first. Next thing you know, they'll be passing laws to require teachers (who are mandated reporters) to notify parents before reporting suspicions of parental child abuse to authorities. Because gods forbid schools keep ANYTHING secret from parents, right?

Oh, and they just HAD to put in that part about banning books that include transgender characters or even address the existence of transgender people! Will ALL school libraries be required to get rid of every book that so much as hints at the possibility that trans people exist? As a former librarian who still fiercely supports intellectual freedom, the idea of actively denying children access to information that some of them may desperately need makes my blood boil. Yes, public libraries exist, but not all kids have access to them. (In my case, the public library was a long way from where we lived and my mother didn't have a driver's license. It was a great day for me when the bookmobile started to make a weekly stop in my neighborhood, even though what it offered was only a fraction of what was available in that big building that I never got to visit.)

What we need is this country right now is a MASSIVE public education program to combat all the lies and distortions about trans people and trans issues that are being spread by the right. More and more people are being brainwashed by those lies and distortions every day, and I don't see anything being done to counter it.

maxrandb

(17,508 posts)
19. Maybe Dems are tired of getting the shit kicked out of them when they suport 0.00001% of the population
Tue May 26, 2026, 01:24 PM
Yesterday

I know it sucks, but until election results change, it makes no sense to give fascist Retrumplicans issues they can beat Dems over the head with.

This kind of "outrage" posting is what causes Dems to lose elections.

Retrumplicans support a fucking pedophile rapist demented clown. That clown won't lose a single vote for being a pedophile.

Whenever a Dem doesn't support someone's issue, we should ask ourselves

" Do I want Henry Cuellar (Texas), Donald Davis (N.C.), Cleo Fields (La.), Laura Gillen (N.Y.), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Marcy Kaptur (Ohio), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.) and Eugene Vindman (Va.) writing legislation and setting domestic policy, or do I want Boebert, Blackburn, Comer, Higgins, Fine and Johnson doing it?

I don't know any of the Dems personally, but I do KNOW this:

- they aren’t going to support sending armed goons into blue cities to violently assault Americans

- they aren’t going to vote for the racist "Save our Retrumplican Asses bill.

- they aren’t going to give a blank check to a drunk ass christofascist Secretary of Defense.

Not to mention the most important point...

IF DEMS HAD GOTTEN JUST A LITTLE MORE SUPPORT IN A HANDFUL OF DISTRICTS, THIS LEGISLATION WOULD HAVE NEVER MADE IT TO THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE!

maxrandb

(17,508 posts)
27. Politicians aren't losing elections for supporting coal miners
Tue May 26, 2026, 02:52 PM
Yesterday

Again, I think it sucks, but it's politics.

I am going to say something very unpopular.

I love Pete Buttigieg. He would be a great president, but he doesn't stand a chance in 2026....hell, maybe not until 2050 or 60.

The Returdlicans would simply run an ad on a loop that just showed him kissing his husband, and he'd lose 40 states.

We need to stop thinking we can just will something into reality, because we want so desperately for it to be so.

Unfortunately, if Retrumplicans get their asses handed to them this November, they will learn that supporting racism, fascism, misogyny hatred and white supremacy is a "losing" strategy, but that is THE ONLY thing that will teach them that lesson!

It's not that he's a pedophile.
It's not that he's a rapist.
It's not that he's every vile thing that ever existed in America, scraped up and stuffed in a wrinkled sausage-casing.
It's not that he's vile, evil and corrupt...

It will take losing elections to teach Retrumplicans a lesson.

I am NOT wrong. We all know that if gas was $1.50 a gallon, his approval rating would be 55%.

That is the saddest, but truest thing of all.

OldBaldy1701E

(11,624 posts)
28. So, people should suffer and die in the name of making sure we don't endanger the infrastructure.
Tue May 26, 2026, 03:36 PM
Yesterday

Got it.

I also find it slightly amusing that you think the midterms are going to go down without a hiccup. But, that is just me.

They will not 'lose' elections if they refuse to accept said elections, now will they?

Of course, we could just stop playing politics. Why we think that this is not a good idea is a bit beyond me. By advocating for 'keeping things the same', by continuing to operate within a corrupted and biased system we are just making sure that they do stay the same... in all regards. Is that what we want?

Is power worth the pile we will have to stand on to get it? Because, to be honest, the answer I am seeing is very disconcerting.

(By the way, don't be concerned about being 'unpopular' for your posts. We need some 'unpopular speaking' around here. It might spark some ideas and some action beyond what is already being done. Maybe.)

maxrandb

(17,508 posts)
30. Of course not
Tue May 26, 2026, 04:21 PM
Yesterday

But we better realize that the Retrumplican Party is an organized crime family, and the Democratic Party is NOT.

Not one single one of the issues regarding the LGBTQ community, or minority communities would be a frickin issue if Dems held the majority!

John Roberts-E-Lee, Beer Boy Biff, the Handmaiden and Conservabot wouldn't be on the Supreme Court if Dems held the majority.

Kegsbreath wouldn't have his drunk-ass hands on the DOD if Dems held the majority.

RFK Jr wouldn't be killing people and snorting cocaine off Health Department toilets if Dems held the majority.

AG?
FDA?
EPA?
EDUCATION?

JFC! None of those incompetent morons would warrant one single serious thoughts if Dems held the majority.

At some point, you vote for the party that won't fuck you over, even when they don't hug you.

OldBaldy1701E

(11,624 posts)
32. "Not one single one of the issues... would be a frickin' issue if Dems held the majority!"
Wed May 27, 2026, 08:52 AM
7 hrs ago

So, what was the excuse for the lack of real change when we had the majority?

maxrandb

(17,508 posts)
33. I guess it depends on what you define as real change
Wed May 27, 2026, 01:08 PM
3 hrs ago

- the Affordable Care Act is real change.
- the first Infrastructure Bill in 80 years is real change.
- the Inflation Reduction Act is real change.
- Justice Jackson on the Supreme Court is real change.

Secretary of State: Antony Blinken instead of Marco Rubio is real change

Secretary of the Treasury: Janet Yellen instead of Scott Bessent is real change.

Secretary of Defense: Lloyd Austin instead of Pete Hegseth is real change.

Attorney General: Merrick Garland instead of Pam Bondi is real change.

Secretary of the Interior: Deb Haaland instead of Doug Burgum is real change.

Secretary of Agriculture: Tom Vilsack instead of Brooke Rollins is real change.

Secretary of Commerce: Gina Raimondo instead of Howard Lutnik is real change.

Secretary of Labor: Marty Walsh instead of Keith Sonderling is real change.

Secretary of Health and Human Services: Xavier Becerra instead of RFCocaine Jr is real change.

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: Marcia Fudge instead of Scott Turner is real change.

Secretary of Transportation: Pete Buttigieg instead of Sean Duffy is real change.

Secretary of Energy: Jennifer Granholm instead of Chris Wright is real change.

Secretary of Education: Miguel Cardona instead of Linda MacMahan is real change.

Secretary of Homeland Security: Alejandro Mayorkas instead of Kristi Noam is real change.

But, speaking of change, how you like the current "change" our country is going through?

But I have a better question for you; "would the lives of the LGBTQ community be better, or worse under a Democratic administration, or the current one?"

J_William_Ryan

(3,597 posts)
29. "Maybe Dems are tired of getting the shit kicked out of them when they suport 0.00001% of the population"
Tue May 26, 2026, 04:17 PM
Yesterday

Think of it instead as Democrats opposing 100 percent of the hateful, bigoted right.

Opposing Republican racism, bigotry, and hate is who Democrats are.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Umm... WTF is this?