Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(63,081 posts)
Mon May 18, 2026, 01:08 PM 5 hrs ago

That bastard Trump chose a patriotic number for his slush fund. Not $1.7 billion. It's $1,776,000,000.

When he made a big deal of a "Warrior Dividend" late last year as a supplementary housing allowance for members of the military, it was a one-time payment of $1,776, sent just before Christmas. I'm sure he thought that was brilliant marketing.

For the slush fund for himself and his pals, he again went with a number meant to show his (nonexistent) patriotism and the (nonexistent) patriotism of the people he'll be rewarding. But he added 6 zeroes.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That bastard Trump chose a patriotic number for his slush fund. Not $1.7 billion. It's $1,776,000,000. (Original Post) highplainsdem 5 hrs ago OP
It's all about the optics with l'il donnie... Totally Tunsie 5 hrs ago #1
This is corrupt! It has to be stopped! OrlandoDem2 3 hrs ago #2
Trump Can't Be on Both Sides of IRS Settlement, Democrats Say LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #3
Any guess on how SCOTUS will rule on this eventually, or how soon they'll have that opportunity? highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #4

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,996 posts)
3. Trump Can't Be on Both Sides of IRS Settlement, Democrats Say
Mon May 18, 2026, 02:28 PM
3 hrs ago

Since trump is on both sides of this "lawsuit", the courts have no jurisdiction. There can be no settlement if there was no real lawsuit in the first place.



https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report/trump-cant-be-on-both-sides-of-irs-settlement-democrats-say

Democrats asked a court to block a reported settlement between the IRS and President Donald Trump over a leak of his tax information during his first term, saying it lacks the bare minimum required to file a lawsuit: two opposing parties.

Nearly 100 House Democrats signed an amicus brief in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida on Monday that says the case doesn’t distinguish between Trump as president and “personal capacity.” The brief also demands the court dismiss the lawsuit as unconstitutional. It sets another marker on how Democrats are finding fresh opportunities to highlight their opposition to how Trump’s personally benefiting from being president.

Trump moved toward dropping his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the 2019 leak of his tax information in a court filing Monday morning. The Department of Justice announced the creation of a $1.7 billion federal fund to pay victims of so-called government weaponization to resolve the lawsuit, under which Trump wouldn’t receive any money directly.

“The President has repeatedly claimed far-reaching Executive power and frequently sought to use that power to further his own personal interests,” the brief said. “He cannot pretend that officials at the IRS and the Department of the Treasury—and their lawyers at the DOJ—operate independently from him for purposes of this case.”....

The Democrats’ filing is being handled by a task force led by top House Democrat leaders Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), along with House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jamie Raskin and House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal (D-Mass.).

We urge the Court to dismiss this ludicrous case for lack of jurisdiction and to block any settlement that would turn the Treasury into a vehicle for corrupt self-dealing in violation of the Constitution and Congress’s exclusive power of the purse,” Raskin said in a statement announcing the amicus brief.

highplainsdem

(63,081 posts)
4. Any guess on how SCOTUS will rule on this eventually, or how soon they'll have that opportunity?
Mon May 18, 2026, 02:34 PM
3 hrs ago

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That bastard Trump chose ...