General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court delivers massive blow to Dems' last-ditch gerrymander gambit
By Daniel Hampton
Published May 15, 2026 6:58 PM ET
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday slammed the door on Virginia Democrats' last-ditch effort to revive a congressional map that would have handed them a commanding advantage in the 2026 midterms.
In a one-line order, the justices denied an emergency stay application filed by House Speaker Don Scott (D-Portsmouth), Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Fairfax), and other top Democratic lawmakers seeking to pause a Virginia Supreme Court ruling that struck down the voter-approved redistricting amendment.
The decision means the state's court-drawn 2021 map which gave Democrats a 6-5 advantage will remain in place for the November midterms. The voided amendment, ratified by 51% of Virginia voters on April 21, would have allowed the Democratic-controlled General Assembly to redraw the lines in a map projected to favor Democrats in 10 of the state's 11 districts.
https://www.rawstory.com/virginia-redistricting-2676902942/
But this maga court is alright that votes don't count and voters made a choice...............expand the court..............oh I forgot they are all in on granting a traitor immunity for the Espionage Act...........
Lovie777
(23,687 posts)I believe they knew what the out come would be with the US SC.
Gregory1230
(79 posts)This could start of be a new American Civil War that would be US Civil War II. Also California could to secede USA that similar to original Civil War from Confederates did in 1861. Just saying
FBaggins
(28,758 posts)The ruling is as plain vanilla as they come and appears to be unanimous. It was probably stupid to appeal the decision
MichMan
(17,385 posts)FBaggins
(28,758 posts)It's not generally kosher to bring those up to SCOTUS without arguing them in the courts below
Ms. Toad
(38,806 posts)state law.
The state court didn't make that express determination, but it was an interpretation of the State constitution that was at issue. Interpretation of state constitutions are not a federal issue, unless the state has ruled in a way that puts its constitution in conflict with the US constitution.
Polybius
(22,106 posts)Can anyone confirm? A poster said it was in the LBN thread.
EdmondDantes_
(2,049 posts)Quiet Em
(3,000 posts)this is all that was released
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051526zr_1a72.pdf