Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,639 posts)
Fri May 15, 2026, 01:13 AM 15 hrs ago

Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard.'

Acyn @Acyn 6h
Raskin: The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard. In the name of partisan gerrymandering, you can deliberately abolish every majority-African American district in the South. If you want to deliberately create majority-African American districts, it’s presumptively unconstitutional. So we have a racial double standard that’s being advanced by the MAGA Roberts Court.









Gavin Newsom @GavinNewsom
Stone cold racism on a scale I have NEVER seen in my lifetime is happening in real time.

Louisiana Governor Landry suspended a primary election — where tens of thousands of people had ALREADY VOTED — to redistrict and eliminate Black representation.

Our country is supposed to be about the expansion of liberty and freedom. We're seeing the exact opposite.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard.' (Original Post) bigtree 15 hrs ago OP
that's a long way to say THE SUPREME COURT IS RACIST Skittles 13 hrs ago #1
Just like the Federalist Society intended. rubbersole 12 hrs ago #2
he's actually highlighting the injust decision, itself bigtree 7 hrs ago #4
Raskin, run for president. Passages 8 hrs ago #3
Making EVERY district favor whites: fine. Making even ONE district favor blacks: unconstitutional. nt hvn_nbr_2 2 hrs ago #5
This is the discussion Johnny2X2X 1 hr ago #6

rubbersole

(11,275 posts)
2. Just like the Federalist Society intended.
Fri May 15, 2026, 04:18 AM
12 hrs ago

The SC appears to be just getting started on legalizing their Christian Nationalist agenda. I know they're not going to allow a legal election to take away their power.

bigtree

(94,639 posts)
4. he's actually highlighting the injust decision, itself
Fri May 15, 2026, 08:30 AM
7 hrs ago

...which penalizes remedies related to black citizens, while allowing, directly enabling the very same thing for whites which they said was unlawful.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,813 posts)
5. Making EVERY district favor whites: fine. Making even ONE district favor blacks: unconstitutional. nt
Fri May 15, 2026, 02:19 PM
2 hrs ago

Johnny2X2X

(24,428 posts)
6. This is the discussion
Fri May 15, 2026, 02:22 PM
1 hr ago

That's what they did, said it's OK to draw districts by race as long as it's only to ensure white candidates have majority white districts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme...