General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewsweek: AOC Surges to Lead in 2028 Primary for First Time--Most Accurate Pollster
Last edited Tue May 12, 2026, 06:11 PM - Edit history (1)
The new AtlasIntel poll found Ocasio-Cortez leading among a crowded field of potential Democratic candidates, with 26 percent of respondents saying they would vote for her in the primary.
Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg followed with 22.4 percent, while California Governor Gavin Newsom received 21.2 percent of support in the poll. Former Vice President Kamala Harris received the backing of 12.9 percent of respondents.
No other candidates received double-digit support in the poll, which surveyed 2,069 U.S. adults from May 4-7, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.
https://www.newsweek.com/aoc-surges-lead-2028-primary-first-time-poll-11941529

ananda
(35,452 posts)I like her.
get the red out
(14,067 posts)But there is so much misogyny in the country right now that if there are men that don't even believe women should be allowed to vote, it would be another losing effort to have a woman candidate for President yet.
Fichefinder
(442 posts)bucolic_frolic
(55,734 posts)I'm not seeing the wisdom of this strategy.
awesomerwb1
(5,141 posts)TheProle
(4,071 posts)and it indicates a relatively strong preference for the more progressive wing of the party.
Silver Gaia
(5,414 posts)fujiyamasan
(1,990 posts)I wouldnt put too much stock in this.
AOC definitely will have a bigger role within the party and politics, but I dont see that happening through the presidency. I dont see the party nominating a female for president for the next several election cycles.
Response to TheProle (Original post)
Post removed
TheProle
(4,071 posts)What would behoove people is paying attention to the polls to the extent that it can shape the national conversation leading up to the primaries.
Harris peaked in polls recently, too, after giving a talk.
AOC recently discussed the presidency (among other things) with Axelrod, so yeah it will be a lot of recency bias and name recognition for several months, but it's not worthless info and offers some measure of insight from the people.
The gravitas-weighers in the party elite who thumbed the scale for Clinton and Harris don't exactly have a stellar track record going into '28.
No emoticons readily available for this, but your view on polling is duly noted.
I found her comments measured and plugged into real issues:
She said, in part, that she does not want to make decisions as a lawmaker, with the idea of one day becoming a senator or president weighing in the back of her mind.
"My ambition is to change this country, she said. Presidents come and go. Senate, House seats, elected officials come and go. But single-payer healthcare is forever. A living wage is forever, workers' rights are forever, women's rights, all of that, and so anyways...to a finer point to your question is that when you aren't attached, right, when you haven't been like fantasizing about being this or that since the time you were 7 years old, um, it is tremendously liberating."
She has not confirmed plans to run for president and has also been named as a potential Senate candidate, as Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer is up for reelection. He could retire, but some on the left have said Ocasio-Cortez should challenge him in a primary if he chooses to run again.
Response to TheProle (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Unrepentant Fenian
(1,141 posts)democratsruletheday
(1,917 posts)with Pritzker a strong 2nd. Two fantastic women ran in 16' and 24' and both lost to the worst POS to ever pollute the white house. Not feeling it with a female candidate, as another poster said. Too much misogyny in this country right now. Harsh reality of the matter. Don't shoot the messenger folks, it's just the way it is right now. I don't like it any more than you do.
lostnfound
(17,625 posts)They trust her. They relate to her. They appreciate her priorities.