Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

B.See

(8,743 posts)
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:26 PM Saturday

All Six MAGA 'Justices' Were Partying It Up With Trump at WH Dinner, Hours Before Gutting Voting Rights

Alarm as Supreme Court right-wingers seen at Trump's White House dinner - Rawstory via MSN

The appearance of all six conservative Supreme Court justices — and only the conservatives — at a White House black tie dinner for Britain’s King Charles III is raising eyebrows within the legal community.

According to MS NOW legal analyst Lisa Rubin, all six justices nominated by Republicans... attended the Tuesday night event. "None of the three justices nominated by Democratic presidents were there, invited or not," Rubin reported.

The timing is particularly striking because the dinner occurred just hours before the court released a 6-3 decision significantly weakening the Voting Rights Act, and on the eve of oral arguments about the legality of the administration ending temporary protected status for Syrian and Haitian immigrants.

Historically, state dinners feature only a single Supreme Court justice. During Trump's first state dinner in 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts and his wife were the sole court representatives invited.


Laura Coates: 'Today six Justices all but threw away the Voting Rights Act of 1965' - CNN All meaning has been erased from the Voting Rights Act of 1965. That's what CNN Chief Legal Analyst and Anchor, Laura Coates, is arguing. Laura spent years as a career prosecutor in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division. And she warns minority voting power will be diluted and efforts to change that will now be "insurmountable" to prove.


AND NOW A WORD FROM J. CARVILLE: "Corrupt Sons of B---------"

James Carville Rails Against ‘Corrupt’ SCOTUS Justices - The Daily Beast via Yahoo News


“These sons of b----es were so political, so happy to help the Republican Party any way they could,” the Democratic strategist raged. “They wrote a convoluted decision that legal scholars are still trying to wander through to think what the f--- was the rationale for this.”

“There is no reason, none, that you should have any respect or any admiration for this pack of people who take money from anybody, don’t report anything, are the only nine people in the entire f---ing federal government that operates under no ethic rule,” he said.

“What do they do?” Carville continued. “They take trips. They take money. They show up at the airport, and they fly on world-class fishing trips to Alaska. They sell their houses to people for more money to practice law before the Supreme Court. Their wives work as headhunters for law firms that practice before the Supreme Court.”

Carville also weighed in on Robert's, calling him a (checks notes) "f---ing clown... a partisan hack clown.”

um... What HE said.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All Six MAGA 'Justices' Were Partying It Up With Trump at WH Dinner, Hours Before Gutting Voting Rights (Original Post) B.See Saturday OP
They have no shame UpInArms Saturday #1
The "Shit 6" wolfie001 Saturday #2
When we are ever in power again will we have the guts to... NNguyenMD Saturday #3
I sure hope so. B.See Saturday #6
Not even pretending anymore orangecrush Saturday #4
That's the problem bluestarone 11 hrs ago #9
Kick dalton99a Saturday #5
MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive LetMyPeopleVote 12 hrs ago #7
Exactly. And that was Robert's intent B.See 11 hrs ago #8
"We're not partisan hacks! We're racist fuckwits! It's a completely different thing!" struggle4progress 10 hrs ago #10

NNguyenMD

(1,334 posts)
3. When we are ever in power again will we have the guts to...
Sat May 2, 2026, 10:36 PM
Saturday

Pack the court to 13? And impeach Alito and Thomas?

B.See

(8,743 posts)
6. I sure hope so.
Sat May 2, 2026, 11:12 PM
Saturday

my druthers? tar, feathers and a rail. (figuratively speaking of course)

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,598 posts)
7. MaddowBlog-Why John Roberts' defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:12 PM
12 hrs ago

Justices should consider not only why most believe the high court is motivated by politics, but also their own role in fueling the problem they find offensive.

Why John Roberts’ defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-05-07T22:39:16.924Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/john-roberts-defense-supreme-court-unpersuasive

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts is clearly aware of public perceptions related to the high court, though he apparently wants Americans to see him and fellow justices as above the political fray. The Associated Press reported on his latest public remarks:

I think, at a very basic level, people think we’re making policy decisions, we’re saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides,” he said. “I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.”

His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.


As part of the same remarks, Roberts went on to argue that sitting justices are not “part of the political process … and I’m not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate.”.....

Why does the public see the justices, as Roberts put it, as “political actors”? It might have something to do with far-right justices issuing regressive and reactionary rulings. And far-right justices getting caught up in indefensible ethics controversies. And far-right justices elevating the presidency above the law.

But I suspect one of the main reasons so many people see justices as “political actors” is the frequency with which they act like political actors. Right around the same time that the public was learning about Roberts’ remarks, Justice Neil Gorsuch, who has a track record of chatting with conservative media personalities, appeared on a conservative podcast, talking about his belief that “young conservatives must have courage to stand by their beliefs.”....

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut argued five years ago, “Judges turning into political actors, giving speeches attacking journalists, is terrible for the court and terrible for democracy.” Justices proceeded to ignore the warning.

The tarnishing of the Supreme Court — its credibility, its integrity and its reputation — has unfolded episodically over the course of several years. If Roberts and his brethren want to whine about public reactions to their work, that’s their right, but if they want to help restore the institution’s standing, they have an enormous amount of work to do. To date, they have shown no willingness whatsoever to even acknowledge the causes of the Supreme Court’s problems, much less take steps to address what ails it.

Roberts is a racist asshole who has been plotting to overturn or gut the Voting Rights Act since Roberts' days in the Reagan DOJ. I still remember reading the Shelby County opinion and dissent where Roberts gutted Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That was NOT a legal opinion but a policy decision based on Roberts' belief that there was no longer racial prejudice. Alito's opinion is merely a continuation of the racist policies of the six asshole SCOTUS justices.

B.See

(8,743 posts)
8. Exactly. And that was Robert's intent
Thu May 7, 2026, 09:19 PM
11 hrs ago

from day one, and Alto's cowardly b.s. arguments, merely a deliberate convolution of fuzzy logic - contorted sufficiently enough to rubber stamp and absolve racist voter discrimination and disenfranchisement. They know exactly what they were doing and why, despite posturing to the contrary.

I've posted regarding both, and promised back then one for Clarence THOMas as well, who I consider the worst of the lot (and I'll discuss why). It will include links to at least 4 articles I'd saved, all predating the Court's more recent outrage.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All Six MAGA 'Justices' W...