Unless SCOTUS does something out of the ordinary and files the ruling sooner.

Having to wait 30+ days before acting is going to put a massive time crunch on the states to redraw their districts, reschedule primaries, and then certify the results in time for military ballots to be mailed by early August.

Adding to the time crunch will be delays caused by the inevitable court challenges.

And imagine still believing 11 years into this thing that these people care about 30 day waiting periods. Or rules. 🤦‍♂️

the pooh poohers, the naysayers, and the cold water pourers the benefit of the doubt, chalking the dismissals up to overconfidence or...... SOMETHING.

But in the face of these recent developments? Well, let's just say I have my own thoughts on it, and leave it at that.

they don't care. They will do whatever they want and demand someone tell them otherwise.

The legislature, which makes the laws, doesn’t follow them?

I know the governor has declared an “emergency” and suspended the date of the primaries, but that doesn’t mean there wont be court challenges or other technical obstacles that might delay the speed at which they can redraw their districts.

We shall see.

Breaking the very ethics laws he pressured the legislature to create?

It sounds like there is a difference between how quickly the lower court from which the case was appealed can act (only after the "mandate" comes down) but the decision is otherwise binding on all other lower courts immediately -- and presumably applicable to whatever comes before them from that date?

In other words, further action on Louisiana v. Callais by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (from which it was appealed to SCOTUS) must await the "mandate," generally issued in 30 days, but otherwise, the decision is binding precedent that other parties in other states can move forward based on?? Or am I reading things wrong??

FWIW, here is AI's (Gemini's) answer to "Are SCOTUS decisions binding as precedent for other cases immediately upon release?"

SCOTUS Helps Louisiana Republicans Obliterate Black, Dem District Ahead of Midterms

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/supreme-court-fast-tracks-vra-decision/

It shows what a useless puppet Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey is. She said on Wednesday that Alabama wouldn't do this. Those of us who see her for what she is knew that stance wouldn't last long, not once her handlers got hold of her and told her how to change course. Then in 24 hours, she had changed her tune.

don't give a flying f about polls or public opinion. The plan was to cheat all along.

redraw a gerrymandered map?

I haven’t looked elsewhere, but all of New England is already 100% D.
What other D states could be redrawn under this decision?

Voters need to remember that