General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-Judge rejects Pentagon effort to restrict press access, says it smacks of 'autocracy'
The Defense Department keeps trying to impose unnecessary limits on journalists. It keeps losing in court.
Judge rejects Pentagon effort to restrict press access, says it smacks of âautocracyâ
— EUROPE SAYS (@europesays.bsky.social) 2026-04-10T16:00:21+00:00
https://www.europesays.com/2909851/
The first time Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethâs Pentagon tried to impose restrictions on the free press, it lostâ¦
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/judge-rejects-pentagon-effort-to-restrict-press-access-says-it-smacks-of-autocracy
A federal judge has rejected Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths renewed effort to restrict press access to the Pentagon, calling it an attempt to dictate media coverage that smacks of an autocracy, not a democracy.
The curtailment of First Amendment rights is dangerous at any time, and even more so in time of war, U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman wrote Thursday. The Constitution demands better. The American public demands better, too.
The problem began in earnest last fall when Hegseth and his team, as part of a larger offensive against journalism at the Pentagon, told news organizations that reporters wouldnt be allowed to cover the department unless they agreed only to report information, including unclassified information, authorized for release by the administration.....
Last month, Friedman ruled against the Pentagons restrictive press access policy, concluding that it violated the First Amendment and granted the government overly broad authority to control the press corps access. The court decision fueled some hope that conditions at the Defense Department might return to normal.
Those hopes were soon dashed. Hegseths team responded to the ruling by imposing new limits on media organizations, including closing a workspace used for years by journalists.
The case quickly went back to court, and the Pentagon lost again.
Walleye
(44,986 posts)Hes just like a sex pest, who thinks he can just wear the girl down by doing the same thing over and over. Rapists never take no for an answer. Thats where were at with this government. Its all being run by a rapists
LetMyPeopleVote
(180,288 posts)Hegseth's "new" press rules were the same rules as before. Hegseth ignored the Court's ruling and this Judge was pissed.
A federal judge smacked down Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's new attempt to write rules for Pentagon correspondents, concluding that the department has once again infringed on the First Amendment.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-04-09T22:50:54.961Z
https://www.rawstory.com/hegseth-2676695364/
The issue stems from a controversial policy issued by the Pentagon that requires reporters to commit not to publish anything leaked in violation of department policy as a condition of obtaining credentials. This rule caused every mainstream news outlet, and even most right-wing news outlets, to pull out of the press pool, leaving just a group of far-right bloggers and MAGA activists.
Last month, U.S. Senior District Judge Paul Friedman ruled this was not allowed. However, plaintiffs challenging the policy asserted that the Pentagon's "interim" policy effectively violated the terms of Friedman's order and in a lengthy, scathing ruling issued on Thursday, Friedman agreed.
"The problem for the defendants ... is that the Department has not in fact taken 'new' action, at least with respect to the proscription on the 'inducement of unauthorized disclosure,'" wrote Friedman. "To the contrary, as explained in detail below, that proscription contained in the Interim Policy amounts to in the Departments words a 'clarification' of the prohibitions contained in the original Policy that this Court held to be unconstitutional ... The Department cannot simply reinstate an unlawful policy under the guise of taking 'new' action and expect the Court to look the other way."
The "interim" policy limiting what journalists can write about the Pentagon, he wrote, constitutes the mark of an autocracy, not a democracy.
"The Court cannot conclude this Opinion without noting once again what this case is really about: the attempt by the Secretary of Defense to dictate the information received by the American people, to control the message so that the public hears and sees only what the Secretary and the Trump Administration want them to hear and see," he wrote. "The Constitution demands better. The American public demands better, too."
This judge is pissed
peggysue2
(12,539 posts)Ya think?
Everything this Administration is doing is the very definition of autocracy. Thankfully, we have the lower courts acting in defense to 'smack-down the likes of Pete Hegseth.
It means we're holding on by our fingernails. But still holding. The crucial test will be in November.