Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDNC rejects resolution against AIPAC influence
As per multiple outlets.
-Sigh- When will they stop taking the genocide money?
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNC rejects resolution against AIPAC influence (Original Post)
3_Limes
11 hrs ago
OP
No. Its a link to numerous sources all carryinv the story. If Its important that it be a single
3_Limes
10 hrs ago
#5
Then do it. I don't want to load another search engine. What are the sources, and where is it coming from?
lostincalifornia
10 hrs ago
#6
Also good, and should be in the OP. What should have been in that resolution is rejection of ALL lobbying groups
lostincalifornia
10 hrs ago
#12
That is legitimate, and no offense, should have been included in the OP. That said, what should have been included
lostincalifornia
10 hrs ago
#9
Well, I don't understand, and that is ok, I just think it provides better direct access. That being said, for
lostincalifornia
10 hrs ago
#13
no_hypocrisy
(54,997 posts)1. My guess is that AIPAC has been busy collecting dossiers on Democrats.
Influence only goes so far.
That's when blackmail picks up the pace.
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)2. What outlets? Where is the link?
3_Limes
(545 posts)3. https://duckduckgo.com/?iaweb&originfunnel_home_website&th_&qdnc+aipac
Here ya go.
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)4. That isn't a link to a source.
3_Limes
(545 posts)5. No. Its a link to numerous sources all carryinv the story. If Its important that it be a single
Source I can do that too.
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)6. Then do it. I don't want to load another search engine. What are the sources, and where is it coming from?
3_Limes
(545 posts)8. Or here.
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)12. Also good, and should be in the OP. What should have been in that resolution is rejection of ALL lobbying groups
influences though.
3_Limes
(545 posts)7. How's this one?
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)9. That is legitimate, and no offense, should have been included in the OP. That said, what should have been included
in that resolution is to reject all lobbying groups, which probably would not have passed either, but at least it would have demonstrated consistency.
3_Limes
(545 posts)11. The particular device I'm on renders DU strangly
And doesn't cooperate with link posting w/out extra effort. Which is why I went with "numerous outlets".
lostincalifornia
(5,392 posts)13. Well, I don't understand, and that is ok, I just think it provides better direct access. That being said, for
consistency, the resolution should have included rejection of all lobbyist groups influence.
Celerity
(54,511 posts)10. of course they did
DNC rejects resolution condemning influence of pro-Israel Aipac lobby
Panels decision a blow to progressives who are unhappy with groups involvement in Democratic contests
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/09/dnc-resolution-aipac-israel-lobby-group
When it comes to addressing how the party should deal with Israel, the Democratic establishment went to their favorite answer: no thanks. The Democratic National Committees resolutions committee voted on Thursday to kill a measure targeting the pro-Israel lobby group Aipac and deferred two further resolutions on Middle East policy to a working group that critics say exists mainly to avoid difficult decisions.
During a meeting in New Orleans, the party rejected a symbolic resolution to confront what its sponsors described as the outsized influence of dark money in Democratic primaries singling out the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which spent approximately $14m in a single Illinois Democratic primary and has pumped tens of millions more into races across the country to block candidates critical of Israel.
The defeat, while anticipated, lands as a fresh blow to progressives who have grown increasingly furious at Aipacs intervention in Democratic contests. Aipac has spent more than $221m in Democratic primaries since the 2022 midterms, and over $22m in Illinois alone last month, funneled partly through shell groups with names such as Elect Chicago Women whose ties to the pro-Israel lobby were only confirmed after votes had been cast.
In New Jersey in February, Aipacs affiliated Super Pac spent more than $2m to defeat former congressman Tom Malinowski, though it backfired, with the progressive activist Analilia Mejia, an outspoken critic of Israel, winning the primary instead. The frustration runs deep, as rejecting Aipacs support has become a defining issue in Democratic races, and polling consistently shows the partys base has shifted sharply away from Israel since its decimation of Gaza began in 2023.
snip
Clouds Passing
(8,007 posts)14. Of course they did
Ponietz
(4,352 posts)15. This does not bode well for the Party
Theres good evidence that Israel runs our nations foreign policy.
dalton99a
(94,398 posts)16. +1. Exhibit A: Trump's war with Iran
which never attacked the U.S. and posed no threat to the U.S.