That expression they both have is pretty clear.

I have always been too observant since childhood.

to actually deny very specific things - ie she was a victim or a lover. I remember in the first term she sued a British paper, I think the Daily Mail, for an article before the election, with her nude soft porn modelling photos that suggested she was an escort.The latter could not be proven, so she won a libel suit. For the MAGA base it meant none of that was true, when the truth is her modelling was not fashion modelling!

Here I think she is trying the same thing. Looking for places that suggest she could have been a victim, been part of the trafficking etc. She will use that to suggest she really didn't know them ... When she obviously did.