General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFetterman's a no as Senate Republicans debate new voting restrictions
Last edited Thu Mar 19, 2026, 11:00 AM - Edit history (2)
UPDATED TO ADD WORKING LINK
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette link: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/politics-nation/2026/03/18/fetterman-congress-trump-elections-voting/stories/202603180091
Archived (no paywall) link: https://archive.ph/u8BIL
The Pennsylvania senator sometimes crosses party lines. Not this time.
But as the Senate debates legislation to put new restrictions on voting in advance of this falls midterm elections where control of Congress is at stake Mr. Fetterman is aligned with his party against the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which would require people to prove their citizenship and bring photo identification to the polls.
He's in office as a Democrat, said Lew Irwin, a political scientist at Duquesne University. He was elected as a Democrat. This is where he shares the perspective of his fellow Democrats that this is a solution in search of the problem.
... [ snip] ...
Gov. Josh Shapiro, who successfully fought against Trumps bogus charges of voter fraud in the 2020 election as attorney general, told reporters last month that he opposed the idea that we would turn over our elections to Donald Trump, given his track record of election denialism, given his track record of taking me to court 43 different times during the 2020 election, to try and overturn the will of the people here in Pennsylvania.
"By the way, he went 0 and 43 I went, 43 and 0, and we had a free and fair, safe and secure election, Mr. Shapiro said. The last person who should be running our elections in the United States is Donald Trump.
Under current Senate rules, 60 votes are needed for passage, and Republicans have only 53 seats. Trump is pushing Republicans to kill the filibuster, doing away with the 60-vote threshold, which they can do with just 50 votes.
Update to add working link: My apologies for the broken link, however this link on top works now!
bucolic_frolic
(54,998 posts)Red County PA populations by and large do not have passports. Some only travel 200 miles afield their whole lives. So I don't see this as progress, I see it as self-serving that needs not to be misinterpreted.
2naSalit
(102,416 posts)The Amish and others? They vote, don't they? How many of them have a passport or state ID/Driver's license?
Just in that state alone there are many who would be put at a disadvantage with the requirements in the Bill.
I have all my papers but it wasn't cheap and took time. Getting a passport takes a couple months, usually, so it's really a poll tax.
Akakoji
(513 posts)End up living their entire lives within 50 miles from where they were born.
ProfessorGAC
(76,602 posts)I have lived with 55 miles of where I was born, and 20 miles from where I grew up my entire life.
But, I've worked in 41 countries outside the US, have visited 49 of the 50 states, and when I retired my frequent flyer miles on my primary airline slightly exceeded 2.5 million miles.
Changing locations has nothing to do with whether someone lived a fully parochial existence.
Skittles
(171,535 posts)I would find that, well, incredulous
samplegirl
(13,958 posts)What a joke! He's a joke!
twodogsbarking
(18,642 posts)FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)Chump cannot be in charge of any elections. Every state (and county) manages its own elections and that's how it has always worked. There is no need to change the system. Even Fetterman gets it!
This SAVE Act - and it will never be enacted - would be a disaster.
3Hotdogs
(15,331 posts)round and round.
Vinca
(53,916 posts)FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)... and also from Pennsylvania Democrats who are getting damn angry!
hatrack
(64,821 posts)I'll believe him when the vote is completed.
GiqueCee
(4,145 posts)... and despite his gimmick of dressing like a slow-witted teenager, I was a vocal supporter of his. Please note the past tense.
There's really very little to parse regarding the SAVE Act. Republicans know they can't win free and fair elections because voters who pay attention to the FACTS utterly reject their diseased and divisive policies. They wipe their asses with the Constitution, and dismiss that line in the Preamble, "promote the general Welfare", because the only welfare they're concerned with is their own, and that of their lords and masters, the billionaires. They don't give a nanoparticle of a shit about their constituents, or the nation as a whole, they are obsessed with, and determined to wield, total dominion over the lives of others, more commonly referred to as POWER.
FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)It happened immediately after the Nov. '22 election. Then he went into depression and a downward spiral, with his inability to process normal speech etc. He sometimes needs to read subtitles whenever he's in a meeting because he has trouble with processing language. It's not a mental deficiency, it's a problem with connecting and communicating thoughts.
Well OK we're all sympathetic, but we also need him to be our Senator. We need him to stand up to Chump and vote the way he told us he would whenever he was elected in 2022.
Chump has been taking advantage of Fetterman and possibly even blackmailing him. The best thing that could happen is that John Fetterman should resign this year and allow Shapiro to appoint a replacement. Then we would elect a new Senator in 2028.
Even if he doesn't resign, Fetterman won't get re-elected, that's a given. Sad but true.
karynnj
(60,944 posts)It took a long time before people learned how damaging it was.
My guess is those closest to him on his team really believed he would continue to recover to end up where he had been. It can happen and the degree of recovery takes a lot of time to know.
Early voting had already happened. People voting election day voted without knowing how bad the stroke was. I sympathize with his team at that point. As it was not clear how full his recovery would be, it would have felt like betraying him when he was down to suggest that he stand down at that point and there probably was little chance he would have done so.
FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)Also his health problems began long before the 2022 primary. He had already collapsed while he was presiding over the state senate as well as losing 150 lbs. in 2018. He wasn't truthful about his health conditions even before that time.
ColoringFool
(655 posts)radical noodle
(10,578 posts)But it's paywalled, so you may not want to bother.
FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)The Post-Gazette will let you read the story even if you aren't a subscriber.
But I agree that they are very intrusive and annoying, so I should have added the No Paywall link earlier this morning.
radical noodle
(10,578 posts)FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)Sorry, I posted this at 6 a.m. before my first cup of coffee.
UTUSN
(77,672 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(179,305 posts)Fetterman will probably not run in 2028. If he does, Fetterman will be primaried
CNN's Harry Enten zeroed in on a Democratic senator who will "no doubt" face a primary challenge, and history suggests he will likely lose.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-03-20T18:00:13Z
https://www.rawstory.com/stringr/john-fetterman-democrat
Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) has seen a stunning reversal in his support from his own party's voters since he was first elected to the U.S. Senate in 2023, and Enten told "CNN News Central" that he has never seen an elected official lose backing so dramatically.
"I would just say that John Fetterman is doing as well with Pennsylvania Democrats as the New York Giants are as liked in the state of Pennsylvania, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania," Enten said. "I mean, just look at this: Among Pennsylvania Democrats and that approval of Fetterman, back in 2023, he was a Democrat, liberal darling. He was at plus-68 points. Look at how low he has fallen, down to minus-40 points. He's down there with the Titanic among Democrats in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and, you know, put a comparison point on it."
"You know, we always talk about how [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer is not well liked by the Democratic base nationwide," Enten added. "Chuck Schumer has a net popularity rating of about minus-two points. He is 38 points more popular than John Fetterman is with Pennsylvania Democrats, and I was also looking at Kyrsten Sinema, who, of course, ended up leaving the Democratic Party in Arizona. She was considerably more popular just before she shifted over than John Fetterman is, at minus-40 points."
Anchor John Berman marveled at Fetterman's drop. "This is 108-point swing," he said, and asked Enten what bearing that might have on his fortunes when he faces re-election in two years.
FakeNoose
(41,452 posts)He has no hope of getting re-elected in Pennsylvania. I know I'm supposed to support Democrats as a DU member, but Fetterman is hopeless. I voted for him in 2022 and donated to his campaign. When he ran as former Gov. Tom Wolf's Lt. Governor in 2018, I voted for them (and him.)
But Fetterman lost me in the last 14 months, as soon as he put on the presidential kneepads and kissed Chump's butt. It's too much for any of us in Pennsylvania.
The best possible thing is for him to resign this year. If not he definitely should resign next year. Gov. Shapiro would appoint his replacement and the new Senator would still have time to put together a campaign for 2028.
DU can alert me for this post and I don't care. Pennsylvania Repukes don't want Fetterman and we Democrats are totally disgusted with him. He has earned it.
bigtree
(94,167 posts)Bobstandard
(2,285 posts)I dont know if cave is the right word but hell end up voting with the Republicans. Its not really a cave if he was a DINO all along.
BlueKota
(5,322 posts)As Stephanie Miller quotes frequently: "Even a broken clock is right twice a day." Fetterman needs to vote with the party that elected him, at least one more time to even catch up to that.