General Discussion

DavidDvorkin

(20,542 posts) Sun Feb 22, 2026, 04:12 PM 19 hrs ago

Predict Trump's behavior during the SOT speech

65 votes, 0 passes \| Time left: Unlimited
	He will fall asleep while making his speech.
	2 (3%)
	He will make a big poopy at the midpoint of the speech.
	3 (5%)
	He will curse his enemies and the world and proclaim his greatness.
	56 (86%)
	He will shriek incoherently and do handstands.
	1 (2%)
	Stroke and/or heart attack.
	3 (5%)
	He will deliver cogent, thoughtful, insightful remarks that will reassure Americans and make the world love and revere him.
	0 (0%)
	Other.
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Predict Trump's behavior during the SOT speech (Original Post) DavidDvorkin 19 hrs ago OP

there are probably odds on the poopy at fanduel rampartd 19 hrs ago #1

Seriously. buzzycrumbhunger 19 hrs ago #2

Likelihood of a 3 year-old toddler tantrum is 100%. rsdsharp 18 hrs ago #3

Mostly, he will resort to bragging while blaming everybody and playing the victim Ping Tung 17 hrs ago #4

I wanted to vote for shrieking and handstands, but 3rd choice seems more accurate 0rganism 17 hrs ago #5

If any of the SCOTUS justices who ruled against trump attend the SOTU, trump will call them out LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #6

rampartd

(4,425 posts)

1. there are probably odds on the poopy at fanduel

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 04:16 PM

19 hrs ago

but the poor sportsmanship, self agrandizement, blaming enemies, etc are sure things.

buzzycrumbhunger

(1,782 posts)

2. Seriously.

Reply to rampartd (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 05:04 PM

19 hrs ago

I do think there’s a good chance he could nod off halfway in, though. No option to vote on a trifecta.

rsdsharp

(11,910 posts)

3. Likelihood of a 3 year-old toddler tantrum is 100%.

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 06:03 PM

18 hrs ago

Ping Tung

(4,302 posts)

4. Mostly, he will resort to bragging while blaming everybody and playing the victim

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 06:35 PM

17 hrs ago

The show has become boring in it's regular display of absurdity and lies.

0rganism

(25,546 posts)

5. I wanted to vote for shrieking and handstands, but 3rd choice seems more accurate

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 06:48 PM

17 hrs ago

Incoherent shrieking and tantrum handstands would at least be entertaining for a few minutes, but i can't honestly pick it. Let's face it, F47 ceased to be entertaining decades ago - if he ever was. Especially now, his dishonest diatribes and relentless cruelty stand simply as additional evidence of F47's completely obvious unfitness for the job.

Oh well, maybe he'll throw in a shriek or two on the way out.

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,741 posts)

6. If any of the SCOTUS justices who ruled against trump attend the SOTU, trump will call them out

Reply to DavidDvorkin (Original post)

Sun Feb 22, 2026, 07:04 PM

17 hrs ago

I wonder if SCOTUS justices will show up for the SOTU? In particular, I wonder if the trump appointees will show up. trump has already attacked these justices and if they show up to the SOTU, you can bet that trump will attack them again. There are already concerns about the safety of the SCOTUS justices due to trump's attacks

Supreme Court Justices may be fearing for their lives after Donald Trump's response to their legal smackdown, according to a Jan. 6 investigator.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-02-22T12:00:18Z

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-2675291522

Supreme Court Justices may be fearing for their lives after Donald Trump's response to their legal smackdown, according to a Jan. 6 investigator.

Temidayo Aganga-Williams, an attorney who served as an investigator for the House Jan. 6 committee, appeared on MS NOW over the weekend, where he was asked about Trump's response to the Supreme Court ruling that limited the president's power to tack on new tariffs on a whim.

According to Aganga-Williams, Trump went personal because he nominated these justices. But there could be dangerous consequences, he warned.

"It's always about the person. And here I think what's stark is that he cannot hide behind who appointed them. These are folks that he appointed, that he picked, that he shook their hands and nominated them and espoused how great they are. And even they came down against him. So he has to go down to attacking them personally, which I think is incredibly, incredibly dangerous because it's one thing to say a judge got it wrong," the lawyer said. "When you attack the person, you suggest that the way to rectify this is with that person. And in a world of political violence, I think we get closer and closer to teaching the American people that what they have to do to rectify their needs is not go through institutions, but instead something far more dangerous. And I think that's the path we're down."

Reply to this discussion