Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Jack Smith transcript:
Jack Smith, p. 27: "There is no historical analog for what President Trump did in this case … [W]hat he was not free to do was violate Federal law and use knowing-- knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function. That he was not allowed to do."
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1.bsky.social) 2025-12-31T21:10:24.411Z
Here's the entire 8+ hours of Jack Smith's testimony where he says he found “proof beyond a reasonable doubt†that Trump engaged in a “criminal scheme†to overturn the 2020 election & that Trump “repeatedly tried to obstruct justice†in the classified documents case.
— @NewsJennifer (Jennifer Schulze) (@newsjennifer.bsky.social) 2025-12-31T22:50:15.759Z
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-b...
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
