Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

B.See

(7,387 posts)
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:41 PM Tuesday

Epstein's Brother Claims He Heard 'from a Pretty Good Source' That Epstein Files Are Being Scrubbed of Republicans

Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Claims He Heard ‘from a Pretty Good Source’ That Epstein Files Are Being Scrubbed of Republican Names - People via MSN

Mark Epstein, brother of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that the files on his late brother, are being edited to remove names of Republicans.

In a phone interview with NewsNation on Monday, Nov. 18, Mark claimed he had been told by an unnamed source that names of conservative politicians were being redacted from the long-awaited Epstein files.

Mark's comments come shortly after Donald Trump encouraged House Republicans to vote to release the files, a shocking reversal from his previous opposition to do so.

Mark claimed that the Trump administration's sudden shift is because the files are being edited so that they are no longer incriminating for Republicans in power.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Epstein's Brother Claims He Heard 'from a Pretty Good Source' That Epstein Files Are Being Scrubbed of Republicans (Original Post) B.See Tuesday OP
Gotta be unredacted copies somewhere....please baby Jesus, please.... wcmagumba Tuesday #1
Shocking. Shocking, I tell you. Liberal In Texas Tuesday #2
I wouldn't trust Mark Epstein at all. Wiz Imp Tuesday #3
I have to hope that on Nov. 6, 2024 misanthrope Wednesday #13
yeah........ Takket Tuesday #4
Highly probable. B.See Wednesday #20
The point is to obfuscate. Oneironaut Tuesday #5
I don't want this to happen, progressoid Tuesday #10
Why would a "Democrat hoax" only contain names of Democrats? misanthrope Wednesday #14
Because they constantly contradict themselves, and, society has the memory of a goldfish. Oneironaut Wednesday #18
Leaked copy of the complete vault of Epstein Files with Republicans removed. usonian Tuesday #6
I seriously doubt that we will ever know who these scumbags are because they can destroy walkingman Tuesday #7
It has been for a long time misanthrope Wednesday #15
It is already a fact that Trump's name has been scrubbed from subpoenaed files. gab13by13 Tuesday #8
After tonight because of the Senate vote JPK Tuesday #9
My first thought after Dump told them to vote for release. roamer65 Wednesday #11
Maybe that's why the donald finally went along with it? calimary Wednesday #12
Or he has no choice planj07 Wednesday #17
This message was self-deleted by its author planj07 Wednesday #16
I think it will blow up in there face if they do that Buckeyeblue Wednesday #19

Liberal In Texas

(15,837 posts)
2. Shocking. Shocking, I tell you.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:44 PM
Tuesday

Hopefully, someone might one day forensically restore the damage being done to the evidence.

Wiz Imp

(8,299 posts)
3. I wouldn't trust Mark Epstein at all.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:55 PM
Tuesday

But even if true, I'm confident it will not work.

There are plenty of people who have seen the files. Who knows how many people were working on the investigation under the Biden DOJ which Trump/Bondi stopped immediately upon taking office but I'm sure there were a lot of people working on it. The Biden DOJ was deciding who to charge and with what crimes. I'm sure there will be whistleblowers revealing the truth if necessary. Oh, and the bill itself details the only information that can be legitimately withheld or redacted. The only info that can be legally redacted is names and personal info of the victims. The names of any persons who had contact with Epstein that are mentioned in the files should be released. Embarrassment is not a valid reason for redaction.

(1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that—

(A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;

(B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A;


(C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary;

(D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or

(E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress.

(3) To the extent that any covered information would otherwise be redacted or withheld as classified information under this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that classified information to the maximum extent possible.

(A) If the Attorney General makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects the national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security, the Attorney General shall release an unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld classified information.

misanthrope

(9,329 posts)
13. I have to hope that on Nov. 6, 2024
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:35 AM
Wednesday

Someone, or several someones, started doing what they could to retain copies of those files knowing who was coming into office in two and a half months' time and what was going to happen to those files. Remember the vast feeling of despondence that settled over rational Americans in those days following the election? Certainly that same realization stirred someone into action.

Takket

(23,373 posts)
4. yeah........
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 09:56 PM
Tuesday

sorry but you can't convince me that after these rethugs shut down the government to avoid the files being released.... that suddenly we're just supposed to believe they want them released, with only 1 rethug voting against it.

they needed the time to scrub, edit, and alter a massive pile of documents, and the shutdown afforded them that time. we're not going to get anything out of this file release.

Oneironaut

(6,160 posts)
5. The point is to obfuscate.
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 10:05 PM
Tuesday

By having all Democrats in the files, the Republicans will proclaim victory. When the Democrats call the files openly fake, which they will be, Trump will say the Democrats are only trying to protect their own, and, will say, “Why are you trying to protect pedophiles!?” With a smirk on his face.

Then, both sides argue about which files are real, and; it becomes another Left vs. Right bickering match. The public loses interest, and, the whole thing goes away.

We’re in the dumbest timeline possible.

progressoid

(52,374 posts)
10. I don't want this to happen,
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 11:40 PM
Tuesday

but I suspect it will. Trump was too eager to suddenly approve of the files' release. They know that the extensive right wing noise machine will be more than happy to help obfuscate.

ugh.

misanthrope

(9,329 posts)
14. Why would a "Democrat hoax" only contain names of Democrats?
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:37 AM
Wednesday

It makes as much sense as the rest of his palaver.

Oneironaut

(6,160 posts)
18. Because they constantly contradict themselves, and, society has the memory of a goldfish.
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 09:51 AM
Wednesday

They’re flooding the zone. They don’t care if you remember what they said in the past, and, how it makes no sense now. They just need the general American public to have forgotten, so that they can call you crazy and a liar for pointing out that Trump completely contradicted himself.

If you study this administration’s talking points for consistency, they play out like a soap opera plot, consistency-wise. They constantly invent new things and “retcon” what they said in the past. It’s all a game to them.

walkingman

(10,145 posts)
7. I seriously doubt that we will ever know who these scumbags are because they can destroy
Tue Nov 18, 2025, 10:38 PM
Tuesday

their victims lives with litigation (most people do not have the resources to fight the wealthy) or with actual death threats to them and/or their family.

Our justice system is not designed or intended to protect innocent victims. The reality is that we have two different justice systems in America, and this is not just under the present administration. There is one set of rules for the wealthy and famous and another for the regular working class in America.

It sucks but it is reality.

misanthrope

(9,329 posts)
15. It has been for a long time
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:38 AM
Wednesday

That was what was stripped bare in the OJ Simpson case and most of America refused to see it because all they can focus on is race.

roamer65

(37,813 posts)
11. My first thought after Dump told them to vote for release.
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:29 AM
Wednesday

The scrubbing was completed.

planj07

(56 posts)
17. Or he has no choice
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 12:46 AM
Wednesday

It would have been brutal for him to demand Congress block it only to have them ignore him. His best chance is flee or pull his same old trick: just lie. The base is extremely loyal and would no doubt back him in it all being a Democrat conspiracy.

But the GOP has more to worry about than Trump’s base.

Response to B.See (Original post)

Buckeyeblue

(6,127 posts)
19. I think it will blow up in there face if they do that
Wed Nov 19, 2025, 10:00 AM
Wednesday

I suspect that they'll get a federal judge to block the release.

There are enough people familiar with the file who, I suspect, will speak up if the file is incomplete. The victims for one thing. But I think other investigators as well. And then that will become the story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Epstein's Brother Claims ...