General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2naSalit
(98,989 posts)That was quick!
Now we get to hear the excuses from pretentious pam.
MineralMan
(150,344 posts)It's news.
2naSalit
(98,989 posts)I am glad of it but the next hurdle is soon to upon us.
newdeal2
(4,502 posts)But I hope to see him squirm for as long as possible.
malaise
(291,242 posts)led by Trump and Bondi.
Volaris
(11,279 posts)Only targets of active investigations are off limits, everything else is fair game.
So, unless Pam is dumb enough to open an investigation into trump himself, he's got nowhere to hide, and any dems being looked at, are protected from public disclosure.
yaesu
(8,821 posts)my prediction, a resounding NO!
ForgedCrank
(2,975 posts)how this might conflict with the courts.
There were federal rulings that prohibited this stuff from getting released, grand jury testimony and stuff.
Admittedly, I don't know why the judges prohibited it, so I'm wondering if that will be the thing that prevents the stuff from getting out regardless of these votes.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-denies-dojs-request-unseal-epstein-records-criminal/story?id=124818529
doublethink
(7,261 posts)MineralMan
(150,344 posts)Saw it happen. Go to any news outlet.
doublethink
(7,261 posts)is it Veto Proof? Votes on Record. Sorry to be a pest but still excited.
bluestarone
(20,821 posts)Never will happen, until forced somehow. (my thoughts only)
MineralMan
(150,344 posts)W_HAMILTON
(9,898 posts)Even if they were to attempt a cover-up, you trust these nincompoops to not fuck it up somewhere along the line?
Knowing them, instead of redacting Trump's name in black, they'd highlight it in yellow.
Oh, and there's always the whistleblowers...
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,929 posts)It reminds me of Jeff Flake and the FBI "investigation" of Beer Bong Kavanaugh. So really it's more of a sick feeling.