Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:13 PM 20 hrs ago

Someone Has Posted that the Epstein Files Have Been Released in GD

That is not true. It is a false post. Please do not be taken in.

If that had occurred, it would be a massive breaking news story in all media.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Someone Has Posted that the Epstein Files Have Been Released in GD (Original Post) MineralMan 20 hrs ago OP
I interpreted the post as a "what happens when" they have been released? kentuck 20 hrs ago #1
That is not what it said, though. MineralMan 20 hrs ago #8
Here's a link to the 20k documents that have been released. Is this what you're referring to? TheRickles 20 hrs ago #2
I'm not referring to anything. MineralMan 20 hrs ago #13
They didn't say they have been released. I read it as a what if trump is involved what is Autumn 20 hrs ago #3
I read it exactly as MM did obamanut2012 20 hrs ago #4
I found nothing confusing about it. I knew they had not been released. nt Autumn 20 hrs ago #6
"Epstein files are released" is the post's headline. greatauntoftriplets 20 hrs ago #7
I read past that so I understood what the poster was talking about. It's not big deal. Autumn 19 hrs ago #17
The title was a simple declarative sentence. MineralMan 20 hrs ago #9
Only possible defense (and I'm not defending it)... GJGCA 20 hrs ago #14
Maybe, but the poster went on in the body of the text MineralMan 19 hrs ago #15
Not everybody reads like everyone else. I understood it clearly. Autumn 19 hrs ago #16
Lets say the Epstein Files Have Been Released leftstreet 20 hrs ago #5
If that was what it said, then I'd agree. MineralMan 20 hrs ago #11
That's true leftstreet 20 hrs ago #12
The OP has corrected their headline MustLoveBeagles 19 hrs ago #18
Good. MineralMan 19 hrs ago #19
Thank you MustLoveBeagles 20 hrs ago #10

kentuck

(114,945 posts)
1. I interpreted the post as a "what happens when" they have been released?
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:16 PM
20 hrs ago

But, it was a very confusing post.

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
8. That is not what it said, though.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:23 PM
20 hrs ago

Now, maybe it's just a misunderstanding of the English language, but that title is a simple declarative sentence.

I call them as I see them.

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
13. I'm not referring to anything.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:29 PM
20 hrs ago

I'm calling out an incorrect statement in a post title. The OP has not returned to his thread, so I posted a separate post.

Autumn

(48,662 posts)
3. They didn't say they have been released. I read it as a what if trump is involved what is
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:19 PM
20 hrs ago

the recourse. All valid points with this administration.

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
9. The title was a simple declarative sentence.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:24 PM
20 hrs ago

I do not attempt to do mind-reading here. It was a statement, not a supposition.

GJGCA

(166 posts)
14. Only possible defense (and I'm not defending it)...
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:48 PM
20 hrs ago

...of the headline is a clumsy (given the context) use of the "subjunctive mood"

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
15. Maybe, but the poster went on in the body of the text
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:52 PM
19 hrs ago

as though what he said was true. Now, I'm sure it was just a mistake, but it was a major mistake.

Language can do a great deal if used correctly. If used incorrectly, it can do a great deal of damage.

Autumn

(48,662 posts)
16. Not everybody reads like everyone else. I understood it clearly.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 04:09 PM
19 hrs ago

Epstein files are released
Trump is all over them and clearly involved. So what is the recourse?

To me it was obviously a what happens if

I knew the files had not been released. A quick question on google could answer that.

MineralMan

(150,335 posts)
11. If that was what it said, then I'd agree.
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:26 PM
20 hrs ago

It did not say that, nor did it indicate that a conditional clause was there.

I'm sorry, but some people on DU take posts literally. So, I'm calling that post out. I posted a reply in the thread, but there has been no response by the OP to any of the comments in the thread.

leftstreet

(38,357 posts)
12. That's true
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 03:28 PM
20 hrs ago

It probably needed the caveat. We see a lot of that here, though - headline grabbing - so I'm used to it

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone Has Posted that t...