Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jersey Devil

(10,664 posts)
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 12:59 PM 6 hrs ago

So will the House vote tomorrow on Epstein be unanimous?

I am curious to see whether there are any Republicans who will still vote "no" despite Trump's blessing and permission to for vote releasing the files and what their reasoning could possibly be. How will Mikey vote?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So will the House vote tomorrow on Epstein be unanimous? (Original Post) Jersey Devil 6 hrs ago OP
I believe this to be a front to cover themselves. The files will still be blocked because of the "investigation"... wcmagumba 6 hrs ago #1
Could be, but we are still one step closer Jersey Devil 6 hrs ago #3
They may be stuck thinking "Is Trump testing me?" C_U_L8R 6 hrs ago #2
a rumor wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma? Jersey Devil 6 hrs ago #4
Kinda like the turducken of turds C_U_L8R 6 hrs ago #5
Probably EarlG 6 hrs ago #6
It doesnt matter johnnyfins 5 hrs ago #7

wcmagumba

(5,174 posts)
1. I believe this to be a front to cover themselves. The files will still be blocked because of the "investigation"...
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:03 PM
6 hrs ago

Jersey Devil

(10,664 posts)
3. Could be, but we are still one step closer
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:10 PM
6 hrs ago

If unanimous in the House (or close to unanimous), the Senate would be morally obligated to take up the issue and if it passes it that is another step. Drip, drip. Then what if SDNY unexpectedly acts quickly?

C_U_L8R

(48,557 posts)
2. They may be stuck thinking "Is Trump testing me?"
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:03 PM
6 hrs ago

With no clue whether to vote up or down. That’s what they get for supporting a crook.

Jersey Devil

(10,664 posts)
4. a rumor wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma?
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:15 PM
6 hrs ago

You don't suspect this is some kind of secret code coming from Trump, sort of like the Navaho Code Talkers during World War 2?

EarlG

(23,240 posts)
6. Probably
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:28 PM
6 hrs ago

They know they've lost the "keep everything under wraps" battle, so the next step is moving on to the "pretend that there's nothing important in the files" battle.

We've already heard both Mike Johnson and now Donald Trump say that there's "nothing to hide." That's because they know that there are enough congressmembers to vote for the discharge petition. Given that there are enough votes for it to pass, there will likely be a significant number of other Republicans who also vote for it, which would be embarrassing. So instead Trump is saying, "Go ahead and vote for it," so that when the vote is unanimous he can say, "I meant to do that. In fact I told them to do it." Even though they were going to do it anyway.

This kinda closes off any further avenues to keeping the files under wraps, because a unanimous or near-unanimous vote in the House means the Senate will likely follow suit, and Trump can't very well veto it after telling people to vote to release the files.

I suppose there is still the "files can't be released because they're part of an investigation" gambit. But my guess is that now they're going to let the votes happen, pretend like they meant to do it, and then put "nothing to hide, nothing to hide, nothing to hide," on repeat across the RW mediasphere, until the cult members are conditioned to ignore anything of significance that comes out.

Whether this works might depend on what comes out and how soon. But bear in mind that this is a guy who instigated an insurrection on January 6, and was convicted on multiple fraud felonies, yet was able to turn those around politically. Even being involved in a child sex ring may not be a bridge too far for the true believers.

johnnyfins

(3,266 posts)
7. It doesnt matter
Mon Nov 17, 2025, 01:55 PM
5 hrs ago

The maladministration will not be releasing anything embarrassing or incriminating. It will be like the JFK files.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So will the House vote to...