General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWILL TRUMP DESTROY THE EPSTEIN FILES? - 11.17.25
https://omny.fm/shows/countdown-with-keith-olbermann/will-trump-destroy-the-epstein-files-11-17-25I mean you don't think he's serious about WANTING them released, do you? He's just trying to avoid a 100-vote defeat. Note he hasn't asked the Senate to pass a bill. And he's already throwing out "what can be legally released" caveats - like he cares. And Trump is still threatening to prosecute President Clinton. He's thrown Marjorie Taylor Greene under the bus. He's destroyed the House and the DOJ. He's invoking The Streisand Effect and insisted we all stop talking about it. His Government Shutdown ran out of gas - what does he do now? He's terrified of what's in there, to the point where Senator Chris Murphy said it's enough to potentially end his presidency.
I mean Alexander Haig and others told Nixon to burn the Watergate tapes, in public, with the media present and Haig says Nixon asked him to do it but Haig demurred and later says it was the biggest mistake ever.
So? Will Trump destroy the Epstein Files? Burn them, bury them, dump them, or order Kash Patel or Pam Bondi or just Walt Nauta to do it? And can Democrats make Epstein and what is at minimum Trump's protection of pedophiles the centerpiece of the midterms? To explain to voters that burying the files is why Trump is gerrymandering and trying to fix or cancel those midterms?
If he doesn't destroy them, does he destroy the process by which they could get out? Does he destroy what's left of democracy? The full monty of authoritarianism?
more
Quixote1818
(31,108 posts)If they are redacted in a way that makes Trump look clean are we likely to hear from Judges and others who have seen them to call Trump out and demand that the files that talk about Trump be un-redacted? What do you see unfolding if Trump's DOJ is trying to help Trump look good?
Heres how this realistically plays out if redactions appear to protect Trump and his DOJ is perceived as trying to shape the release. This is one of those situations where political pressure, institutional norms, and individual incentives collide and when that happens, people talk.
Below is a grounded, step-by-step forecast of what would likely unfold.
⭐ 1. Judges and Others With Access Will They Speak Out?
Federal judges who handled Epstein cases already know whats inside
Some of them have reviewed the sealed materials, the victim impact statements, flight logs, deposition transcripts, and evidence from the 20062008 Florida case and the 2019 New York case.
These judges are not political appointees (many predate Trump and Biden) and have lifetime tenure, meaning they cannot be fired.
So would they speak out?
Yes if the redactions are obviously protecting powerful political figures, including Trump.
Judges do not usually jump into political fights, but:
If their courts documents are misrepresented
If DOJ redacts beyond legally defensible levels
If selective release alters the historical record
then a judge can issue public statements, formal orders, or hearings demanding clarification.
Judges have done this in the past when sealed documents were politicized or misrepresented by DOJ.
Likelihood: ~60% that at least one judge or official involved in past Epstein litigation would signal that something is off if Trump appears too clean.
Not by calling Trump guilty, but by saying:
These redactions exceed what the court authorized.
I did not approve these omissions.
This is not consistent with what the court has seen.
This alone would blow up the narrative.
⭐ 2. Former Prosecutors, SDNY Staff, and FBI Agents
People at SDNY (Southern District of New York) were deeply involved in the Epstein case. Many have already retired or moved to the private sector.
You cannot silence ex-DOJ attorneys or retired FBI agents if they feel the record is being falsified.
If they know whats in the files, and Trumps DOJ tries to clean the record:
Youll get anonymous leaks to NYT, WaPo, Reuters, Guardian.
Youll get whistleblower complaints filed with inspectors general.
Youll get television interviews where former officials make pointed comments like:
This does not align with what we saw.
Likelihood: ~70% that leaks emerge if the redactions are suspicious.
⭐ 3. Congress A Major Source of Pressure
If the files look like they protect Trump:
Democrats will demand unredacted releases.
They control subpoenas in the Senate if they hold even a narrow majority.
They can call:
Former prosecutors
Former agents
Judges
Victims lawyers
Clerks who handled sealed records
A congressional hearing with someone saying:
This is not what was in the original case file.
would be devastating.
Even some Republicans might revolt
Especially libertarian Republicans (Massie types) who already resent DOJ secrecy.
If they smell political manipulation, theyll flip fast because their brand is transparency.
⭐ 4. Victims Lawyers The Wild Card
Victims attorneys have seen massive portions of the sealed and unsealed files across two decades of litigation. They absolutely WILL speak up if files are falsified or overly sanitized.
And they are not afraid of any DOJ.
One statement like:
These redactions hide important names and events. The public is being misled.
will trigger a media avalanche.
Likelihood they speak out: ~90%
They have every incentive and moral obligation to do so.
⭐ 5. What Happens If Trumps DOJ Tries to Protect Him?
Heres the chain reaction:
Step 1 The redactions drop and look suspicious
People notice:
Missing dates
Missing witness names
Missing references
Pages blacked out that relate to politicians
Media jumps on inconsistencies.
Step 2 Judges issue clarifying statements
Again, not about Trump's guilt, but that the release does not reflect the full sealed record.
An extremely powerful statement.
Step 3 Leaks start almost immediately
Whistleblowers and ex-officials leak:
What redactions hide
Who pushed for certain edits
Internal DOJ communications
Leaks undermine any attempt to shape the release.
Step 4 Congress launches hearings
This becomes a political scandal bigger than the files themselves.
Youll see:
Demands for unredacted release
Subpoenas for DOJ officials
Motions to compel
Testimony from victims attorneys
Step 5 Trumps strategy backfires
Instead of looking clean, he looks like he tried to hide something.
Even if he DIDNT do anything criminal, the perception of manipulation is enough to cause damage.
⭐ 6. Is It Even Possible to Clean the Files Quietly?
Probably not.
Too many people across:
Federal courts
SDNY
FBI
Victims groups
Congress
Journalists
Oversight bodies
have seen or handled these documents over 2030 years.
This isnt like one dossier in a drawer.
Its thousands of pages spread across multiple institutions.
Trying to clean them now would be like trying to rewrite the ending of a book that millions of people have already read.
⭐ My Bottom-Line Prediction
If Trumps DOJ tries to protect Trump:
Judges will push back.
Ex-officials will leak.
Victims attorneys will loudly object.
Congress will demand unredacted versions.
Media will compare versions against old court leaks.
Public will assume wrongdoing whether or not it exists.
Attempting to sanitize the files would almost certainly backfire and create a political crisis.
Morbius
(792 posts)Delays. Years long delays. By hook or by crook, Trump and the DOJ will delay the release as long as possible... certainly past November of next year.
UTUSN
(76,352 posts)videohead5
(2,810 posts)Have been digitized by now. Anyone at the DOJ or FBI that destroys documents would be breaking the law. People at both agencies have seen those files. They would be getting themselves in a mess. Trump will not be the president forever. Some people that worked there will come forward if they think documents have been destroyed.
NH Ethylene
(31,259 posts)He would absolutely destroy them if he could, and worry about the consequences on another day.
Response to NH Ethylene (Reply #5)
Post removed
Cha
(315,871 posts)you serious? Traitor Always LIES and Projects his own shit on to anyone he can.
Oh and DU is speculating from Experience on what the Traitor would do to save himself from being a Key subject in the Epstein Files.
live love laugh
(16,101 posts)SunSeeker
(57,274 posts)It's what Republicans do.
It would be the act of a desperste man and he would get caught.
We know how many pages should be there. There's too many people who have seen the files. They'll come forward. Maureen Comey, for one, probably has a thumbdrive she's been holding on to.
Warpy
(114,206 posts)and what has disappeared into the bowels of the NYPD as well as FL's cop shops.
What I expect to happen is the maximum amount of foot dragging in the Senate as the MAGAts do damage control and hope it will all just go away. Eventually a bill to release all the files will go to Fatso for his signature,. He will do a pocket veto, probably running ot the clock until the next Congress begins work. At that point, the economy will be in such a mess that the oligarchy will be done with him. I still don't txpect him to be allowed to finish his term. Poor man is ill, you know, needs to spend time with his family.
And that's one of the worst curses I can think of to levy against him.
no_hypocrisy
(53,790 posts)the copies.
New subpoenas with unredacted and/or destroyed documents.