General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe thing that has always seemed strange about the Trump
shooting is that no one seems scared that they too might get a bullet.
Maybe a few. But if I were sitting there, I would be on the ground or as low as I could get.
It is just a mystery to me on one seemed afraid.
Link to tweet
?s=20
Autumn
(48,658 posts)Funny how my daughter doesn't still have a gash in her ear from her cartilage year when she was 4. My recollection is that it took 1-2 weeks to heal.
And I'm sure the injured and dead people were in on the staging.
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,925 posts)about the healing capacity of a four year old child compared to an almost 80 year old.
Ms. Toad
(37,994 posts)that ear cartilage does not heal. That is nonsense.
Orrex
(66,408 posts)Rather than referring to all cartilage in all ears of all ages under all conditions. Nothing is served in open discussion by hyper-focusing on minute literalism.
A better comparison than your daughter would be the very healthy Evander Holyfield, whose ear hasn't grown back after 27 years, versus the sedentary cheeseburger addict whose ear grew back without a scar in under a week.
Ms. Toad
(37,994 posts)Had the post I responded to said growing back, I wouldn't have said anything (on that point, at least).
We aren't salamanders. We don't grow back body parts (aside from the liver). Not my daughter. Not Evander Holyfield. Not Trump.
But that wasn't the claim. It was that cartilage does not heal.
None of us has examined his ear up close, nor do we have a report as to the extent of the original damage. A minor cartilage tear does not take that long to heal. There is probably a scar - but from how quickly it healed, it is safe to assume the damage was much less than Trump wanted us to believe. I doubt the scar would be visible from a distance - my daughter's certainly isn't.
But to suggest that it was all a fake is as insensitive to those killed it injured as it was when the Republicans suggested Sandy Hook was all crisis actors.
Orrex
(66,408 posts)Ms. Toad
(37,994 posts)Whether it was a bullet graze, or debris kicked up by the bullet - no opinion. Bullets and debris were flying - and either one could have caused a superficial wound (including tearing the cartilage), with the bleeding we saw.
There was a gunman. The folks injured and killed by the bullets from that gunman were actually injured and killed.
Even given Trump's continuous lies, it is a step into conspiracy-land to suggest that real people were injured and killed so he could pop a blood capsule and pretend to be hit.
Orrex
(66,408 posts)Autumn
(48,658 posts)Because he wasn't shot. That bullet whizzed by him. He gave an interview a couple of days later and his ear was fine. No injury. No discoloration, no bruising . Nothing. Medical science says that adult cartilage does not have a natural ability to heal or regenerate on its own. End of story. Military doctors are good but not that damn good.
Autumn
(48,658 posts)because it lacks a blood supply. Two fucking days later there was not one fucking mark on his pristine ear.
Medical science.
rsdsharp
(11,556 posts)The people who were shot were not sitting behind Trump, however. They were sitting in stands to the left and right of the stage. The guy who was killed was to Trumps right front closest to, and with his back towards the shooter. The other two were to Trumps left.
republianmushroom
(22,086 posts)RockRaven
(18,422 posts)Exactly what happened with respect to the dead guy? Not really dead? Dead but not really shot? Really shot and really dead but by someone else? Really shot and really dead and by the purported shooter but for some reason other than mere accident/collateral damage? What's the deal?
Permanut
(7,765 posts)anyone who claims that it was an assassination attempt should be able to back up that claim with medical records, including photos and statements from the medical staff.
Maru Kitteh
(31,025 posts)Medical records are protected. Explain the dead man.
Permanut
(7,765 posts)Gosh, I wonder why he's not doing that.
A lot of people have died because of Trump. This is just another one.
My personal unsupported opinion is that the casualties were inflicted to demonstrate that this was a "real" assassination attempt.
John1956PA
(4,624 posts)Then-President Biden stated that no matter how many records of his neurological tests he might release, there would always be a cabal of critics clamoring for more records of a higher detailed nature, and also questioning why more tests were not conducted. President Biden wisely indicated that he was not going to feed the trolls.
Cirsium
(3,153 posts)Killing a bystander would make a fake assassination attempt more credible. You could shut down any speculation just by saying "oh yeah? Explain the dead guy!"
buzzycrumbhunger
(1,482 posts)They set him up to make a credible villain. Obviously, they planned to take him out so he couldnt screw up the story.
Autumn
(48,658 posts)as to how they got him I don't even care . Might want to check his families bank account. Just for shits and giggles. Personally I think if Trump had been wounded he would have sold videos of his medical care and how much he suffered and overcame his injuries. He would have awarded himself a purple heart.
travelingthrulife
(3,832 posts)He killed that man accidentally, and, probably as planned, they shot the shooter. Problem solved.
Funny how we never hear word one about the victim or the shooter.
Fiendish Thingy
(21,556 posts)Do you believe the man in the stands who died was a crisis actor?
Was the shooter not killed?
Two people died and another was wounded in order to stage an assassination attempt to give Trump a boost in the polls?
The gullibility and lack of critical thinking sometimes astounds me - Im sure this will get 100+ recs, like most CTs do here.
Permanut
(7,765 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,556 posts)Was just Trumps shooting staged, or were the other three casualties that day also staged?
If the others werent staged, then that means whoever planned the staged shooting of Trump knew that, except for Trumps fake shooting the area would become a live fire zone, and didnt care who was hurt or killed.
And that the 5/10/20 people involved with the plot knew of these potential consequences, were OK with it, and everyone involved maintained complete secrecy
This from the same crew that communicates war plans via non-secure phone apps.
Last but not least, was Trump in on the plan?
Do you see how ridiculous that sounds?
BannonsLiver
(20,109 posts)That is really really ludicrous, kooky, BSC etc. but yet, Ive seen it done.
riversedge
(78,855 posts)I merely said it was odd that people were not ducking for cover when bullets were flying!!
Fiendish Thingy
(21,556 posts)The tweet you reposted specifically, directly asks the question on a scale of 1-10, how many of you think this was staged? Why post that if you dont believe it? Why not post a YouTube video of the raw footage without the CT nonsense?
Even if you dont believe the shooting was staged, clearly many of the respondents to your OP do, and they have used your OP to spread their CT nonsense.
The lack of a shared reality in this post-truth era is as dangerous to democracy as any of Trumps atrocities (see the quote in my signature line).
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,925 posts)how his ear miraculously healed! Completely! With no scarring! No chunk taken out, no scalp damage!
It was a bogus photo op.
Disaffected
(6,023 posts)For one, his ear damage was superficial and may not have involved ear cartilage at all (the ear is not all cartilage, especially the ear lobe).
Are you familiar with the term "frozen with fear". Things happened very quickly - sudden shock sometimes takes a while to dissipate.
Do you think something "staged" would actually involve firing a bullet v close to Trump's head and with spectators in the background likely to be hit?
And did someone in on the plot then shoot the shooter, all w/o being detected?
The first thing to keep in mind about conspiracy theories is that they are almost always wrong...
travelingthrulife
(3,832 posts)Jack Valentino
(4,049 posts)However, on the question of whether Thomas Crooks was a 'prophet',
I give him a "10" !
Norrrm
(3,465 posts)canetoad
(19,851 posts)He has a Doris Day hairdo. That's strange too.
MorbidButterflyTat
(3,925 posts)What a combo!
meadowlander
(5,030 posts)The simpler explanation to me would be they were in shock or hadn't realised what was happening yet.
Hope22
(4,337 posts).um JFK ..
BannonsLiver
(20,109 posts)But if people dont think hes capable of something like what the op is talking about then they are out of their minds.
3catwoman3
(28,156 posts)right up and give his raised fist salute. Once theyd put him down on the ground, wouldnt they want to keep him there while assessing what was going on?
OLDMDDEM
(2,940 posts)dameatball
(7,638 posts)The incision bleeds like hell but heals up pretty quickly. If the victim happens to be on some type of blood thinner the bleeding would be even more profuse initially. I actually have a flattened area above my right ear where the skin and meager tissue was cut out but the cartilage was not removed. They just tightened everything up around the cartilage and sewed it up.
In the video. Trump did make a swat at his ear prior to being tackled. I don't think that was staged as his reaction times are not that good to have been scripted. Hell, the dumbass would probably have grabbed the wrong ear if it was staged.