Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Department to Investigate Epstein Ties, but Not to Trump
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/14/us/politics/trump-epstein-inquiry-democrats.htmlhttps://archive.ph/WSdYo
Justice Department to Investigate Epstein Ties, but Not to Trump
President Trump ordered the Justice Department to investigate the dealings of Democrats with Jeffrey Epstein, after a week in which his own relationship with the convicted sex offender was in the spotlight.
By Erica L. Green, Glenn Thrush and Alan Feuer
Published Nov. 14, 2025 Updated Nov. 15, 2025, 4:55 a.m. ET
When a trove of Jeffrey Epsteins emails were made public this week, Donald J. Trumps name was all over them. But on Friday, when Mr. Trump demanded that the Justice Department investigate a list of powerful men mentioned in the emails, his own name was nowhere to be seen he had singled out only Democrats.
Equally remarkable was how quickly Attorney General Pam Bondi acquiesced to his demand, even though four months ago the Justice Department formally declared that nothing in the Epstein files warranted further investigation.
That about-face, as much as any action Ms. Bondi has taken this year, demonstrated the near-complete breakdown of the Justice Departments traditional independence to prosecute cases based on facts and the law, as opposed to presidential fiat. And, crucially, it could foreclose any further disclosures of the Epstein files.
Less than four hours later, Ms. Bondi said she had chosen Jay Clayton, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, to handle the matter.
...
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Department to Investigate Epstein Ties, but Not to Trump (Original Post)
dalton99a
Saturday
OP
MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
LetMyPeopleVote
Saturday
#2
unblock
(55,798 posts)1. They're only investigating democrats. Gee, never coulda seen that one coming.
What utter shits we have running the country.
LetMyPeopleVote
(172,793 posts)2. MaddowBlog-Trump eyes federal Epstein investigation that targets his foes, but not himself
The president wants the public to see the Epstein scandal as a hoax except the parts related to people he doesnt like.
Trump expects the DOJ to launch investigations into figures mentioned in the Epstein materials â but not himself.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-11-14T16:56:13.198Z
He also wants us to see the underlying scandal as a âhoax,â except the parts related to people he doesnât like, indifferent to the obvious contraction. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-eyes-federal-epstein-investigation-targets-foes-not-rcna243939
The revelations dovetailed with Republicans on the same committee releasing a tranche of 20,000 documents it received from the Epstein estate in response to a congressional subpoena. An MSNBC report noted that some of the additional email correspondence between Epstein and his associates was unflattering to Trump. A related report in The New York Times summarized, in reference to the documents: Mr. Epstein insulted Mr. Trump and hinted that he had damaging information on him.
In the immediate aftermath of the reports, the usually talkative president had very little to say about the reporting (which includes allegations that have not been substantiated by MSNBC). The Republican published a handful of missives to his social media platform on the matter, but most focused on his appeals to GOP lawmakers to follow his lead on the scandal......
Theres no point in trying to summarize in a single blog post every error of fact and judgment in the presidents 116-word rant the Russia scandal, for example, still isnt a scam but the bottom line comprises three key elements.
The first is that Trump wants federal law enforcement to initiate an investigation into a variety of prominent figures mentioned in the Epstein materials but not himself. Thats a tough position to take seriously.
The second is that the president wants the public to see the underlying controversy as a hoax, except for the parts related to people he doesnt like. How does Trump reconcile the obvious contraction? By ignoring it.
Finally, its worth emphasizing that the president continues to act as if he has decision-making authority at the Justice Department and the FBI. There is no modern precedent for a White House publicly declaring which of the presidents political foes deserve to be targeted with federal investigations, but in 2025 it has become an alarmingly common occurrence.
In late September, Trump used his platform to direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to go after three of his perceived political enemies. In October, he did it again, adding additional names to his enemies list. On Friday morning, he barked related orders.
In the immediate aftermath of the reports, the usually talkative president had very little to say about the reporting (which includes allegations that have not been substantiated by MSNBC). The Republican published a handful of missives to his social media platform on the matter, but most focused on his appeals to GOP lawmakers to follow his lead on the scandal......
Theres no point in trying to summarize in a single blog post every error of fact and judgment in the presidents 116-word rant the Russia scandal, for example, still isnt a scam but the bottom line comprises three key elements.
The first is that Trump wants federal law enforcement to initiate an investigation into a variety of prominent figures mentioned in the Epstein materials but not himself. Thats a tough position to take seriously.
The second is that the president wants the public to see the underlying controversy as a hoax, except for the parts related to people he doesnt like. How does Trump reconcile the obvious contraction? By ignoring it.
Finally, its worth emphasizing that the president continues to act as if he has decision-making authority at the Justice Department and the FBI. There is no modern precedent for a White House publicly declaring which of the presidents political foes deserve to be targeted with federal investigations, but in 2025 it has become an alarmingly common occurrence.
In late September, Trump used his platform to direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to go after three of his perceived political enemies. In October, he did it again, adding additional names to his enemies list. On Friday morning, he barked related orders.
I cut trump's tweet/truth social post from this post. If you want to read trump's tweet/truth social post go to the article. I try not to repost trump's disgusting social media posts when I can.