Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion: Stating the Epstein Files can't be released during an open investigation is DOJ custom, not law correct?
We know Milquetoast Garland and Pam Bondi would honor it as law, but it seems to me public pressure would only increase if its not an actual law.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question: Stating the Epstein Files can't be released during an open investigation is DOJ custom, not law correct? (Original Post)
Chasstev365
Saturday
OP
gab13by13
(30,729 posts)1. Andrew Weissmann said yesterday,
that's the excuse they will use.
GreenWave
(12,038 posts)3. So his estate should release any and all w/o Trump's permission.
Let him know how "oops" feels.
Jersey Devil
(10,683 posts)2. Yes, a custom, but they already broke that custom this year
DOJ formally closed the Epstein case in July, but previous to that Bondi said the files were on her desk and she was reviewing them for release, and the Admin had that big PR stunt with white binders that contained parts of the Epstein files (parts that had already been made public). So if the files could have been released then, why can't they be released now? Plus the Statute of Limitation has probably run out on any crimes disclosed in the files.