General Discussion

johnnyfins

(3,294 posts) Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:24 PM Friday

Is this new investigation by doj involving

Epstein/Democrats deliberate so he/doj can say the files are part of an ongoing investigation? Sounds exactly like something he would do.

Discuss away

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is this new investigation by doj involving (Original Post) johnnyfins Friday OP

Yes, of course Jersey Devil Friday #1

Didnt see your post. Great observation!! johnnyfins Friday #8

I mean. It shouldn't matter if they actually pass the law to release them. SSJVegeta Friday #9

At most, I would think they could only block the material directly related to th investigation. Wiz Imp Friday #11

Thats totally what I was thinking SSJVegeta Saturday #14

Nailed it lame54 Friday #2

Plus no press conference answers during an open investigation lame54 Friday #3

Naturally Jilly_in_VA Friday #4

Great observation & an absolute GIVEN. Pathetically, transparently, blatantly, and all possible synonyms thereof AZJonnie Friday #5

The leaks are coming almost hourly, the Epstein scandal has legs, practically impossible to keep a lid on it now. sop Friday #6

That's exactly it. 2naSalit Friday #7

Why does the public need a law KS Toronado Friday #10

I think the Democrats will continue to try to get as much material as possible from Wiz Imp Friday #12

The repugs can't plug all the holes in the dam. KS Toronado Friday #13

Jersey Devil

(10,682 posts)

1. Yes, of course

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:28 PM

Friday

I posted on this earlier today. It's an obvious scheme to create an "open investigation" so DOJ can have a legal pretext to refuse to release the Epstein files.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220804740

johnnyfins

(3,294 posts)

8. Didnt see your post. Great observation!!

Reply to Jersey Devil (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:38 PM

Friday

The more eyes that see this topic, the better.

SSJVegeta

(2,052 posts)

9. I mean. It shouldn't matter if they actually pass the law to release them.

Reply to Jersey Devil (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 08:44 PM

Friday

Right?

Wiz Imp

(8,282 posts)

11. At most, I would think they could only block the material directly related to th investigation.

Reply to SSJVegeta (Reply #9)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 10:38 PM

Friday

That means, they could refuse to release stuff related to Clinton, but they couldn't block releasing the Trump stuff

SSJVegeta

(2,052 posts)

14. Thats totally what I was thinking

Reply to Wiz Imp (Reply #11)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 12:23 AM

Saturday

If they are only investigating Democrats, doesnt that give them free reign over any files related to the GOP?

Like. Are these people even thinking this stuff through? Like at all?

lame54

(38,976 posts)

2. Nailed it

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:28 PM

Friday

lame54

(38,976 posts)

3. Plus no press conference answers during an open investigation

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:28 PM

Friday

Jilly_in_VA

(13,547 posts)

4. Naturally

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:30 PM

Friday

Also a slam at Democrats and "Crooked Hillary". Because of course she had something to do with it.

AZJonnie

(2,349 posts)

5. Great observation & an absolute GIVEN. Pathetically, transparently, blatantly, and all possible synonyms thereof

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:31 PM

Friday

He should be FUCKING IMPEACHED for ordering the DoJ to do this (and this obviously isn't the first such case).

ANY other POTUS would be. This is a HIGH CRIME AND MISDEMEANOR if there ever was one.

sop

(16,942 posts)

6. The leaks are coming almost hourly, the Epstein scandal has legs, practically impossible to keep a lid on it now.

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:34 PM

Friday

2naSalit

(99,038 posts)

7. That's exactly it.

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 06:35 PM

Friday

And perhaps a little more.

KS Toronado

(22,172 posts)

10. Why does the public need a law

Reply to johnnyfins (Original post)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 09:15 PM

Friday

to look at something a dead guy emailed or texted? PEDOPHILE PROTECTORS

Wiz Imp

(8,282 posts)

12. I think the Democrats will continue to try to get as much material as possible from

Reply to KS Toronado (Reply #10)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 10:42 PM

Friday

the Epstein estate. The DOJ can't block Democrats from releasing that stuff, since the estate owns that material and would be explicitly giving permission to release it to the public.

KS Toronado

(22,172 posts)

13. The repugs can't plug all the holes in the dam.

Reply to Wiz Imp (Reply #12)

Fri Nov 14, 2025, 10:56 PM

Friday

Reply to this discussion