General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump Already Backtracking on Key Dem Shutdown Concession
The GOPs majority whip has revealed a crucial omission from the Democrats deal.The Trump administration has already flipped on one key Democrat request for ending the government shutdown.
Seven rogue Democrats and one Independent sided with Republicans in a Senate vote this week to pass a compromise deal to reopen the government, which has been shut since October 1.
The House of Representatives approved the bill on Wednesday night, which is now awaiting President Trumps sign-off. However, one critical component is set to be missing.
The deal struck with the Democrats included extending government funding through January 30 next year, as well as stopping the Trump administrations mass firings of federal workers and guaranteeing back pay for staff who worked through the shutdown.
It also stated that thousands of federal staff terminated during the shutdown would get their jobs back.
In a new interview conducted on Wednesday before the House approved the bill, a key GOP player admitted the job cuts will not be reversed.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-already-backtracking-on-key-dem-shutdown-deal-concession/
spanone
(140,737 posts)Wont happen now, but is it not up for renewal in January 2026? That may be the time to do it
LearnedHand
(5,163 posts)And do I need this?
Ilsa
(63,624 posts)their misogynistic love of pedophiles.
yaesu
(8,827 posts)EdmondDantes_
(1,181 posts)Especially if you're going to follow it immediately by saying Trump's just going to do whatever he wants. If that's true and he has all the agency, then both choices were equally meaningless short of holding out until a theoretical veto proof majority.
Takket
(23,369 posts)newdeal2
(4,521 posts)Or necessarily cared if he kept his word. Thats my cynical take.
Jack Valentino
(4,070 posts)(yeah, "279" is an arbitrary guess towards the number of
'high crimes and misdemeanors' he will have committed
by the time the House Democrats have authority to bring charges against him...)
onenote
(45,878 posts)Here is what the law states:
"....any reduction in force proposed, noticed, initiated, executed, implemented, or otherwise taken by an Executive Agency between October 1, 2025, and the date of enactment, shall have no force or effect.
(1 ) Any employee who received notice of being subject to such a reduction in force shall have that notice rescinded and be returned to employment status as of September 30, 2025, without interruption. Such employees shall receive all pay to which they otherwise would have been entitled in the absence of receiving such notice, including backpay in accordance with section 116 of this Act.
(2) Within 5 days of date of enactment of this Act, each Federal agency shall send notice to all affected employees and the chairs and ranking members of the Appropriations Committees of the Senate and House of Representatives of the withdrawal of the reduction in force notice and the affected employees reinstatement, if applicable.
SunSeeker
(57,327 posts)stopdiggin
(14,755 posts)Or not in the bill?
( a signed bill becomes the law. and, yes - I believe the courts would uphold .. )
In which case this is just another example of one more Republican blow hard - talking out of his a** - on another cheesy podcast show.
onenote
(45,878 posts)stopdiggin
(14,755 posts)With said information only kind of reinforced my own take ..
Umm .. no? Legislation is legislation. The president has the option of either signing it .. or not signing it.
SunSeeker
(57,327 posts)Text - H.R.5371 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5371/text
DallasNE
(7,926 posts)Or, will simply not bother?
Release the Epstein documents.
DallasNE
(7,926 posts)And open up the government, and then not faithfully execute the provisions Trump doesnt like. That is what dictatorship looks like.
no_hypocrisy
(53,840 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 13, 2025, 04:47 PM - Edit history (1)
IOW, make him do it.
DallasNE
(7,926 posts)That would warrant Mandamus?
durablend
(8,799 posts)Oneironaut
(6,160 posts)Pretty sure we all knew that anyone saying, Well make a deal in the future is full of it. I doubt anyone actually believes them.
WestMichRad
(2,816 posts)
therefore I dont have to honor it.
New rule he just made up. Repukes in Congress stay silent.
republianmushroom
(22,122 posts)I'm not. The only surprising thing is, it took this lone.
oldmanlynn
(759 posts)If they rely just solely on promises, then shame on them thats even worse
Ray Bruns
(5,813 posts)11 Bravo
(24,253 posts)He has two choiceds ... sign it as is, or don't.
Cirsium
(3,176 posts)Obey the law, or disobey the law.