General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThey're laying the groundwork for martial law to shut down democracy. No election, no dissent.
The OP line is from the link.
But Ive been assured that Im way overreacting that none of this is really very important 😡
https://dailyboulder.com/trump-tells-pete-hegseth-to-use-democratic-cities-as-military-training-grounds-for-war/?fbclid=IwZnRzaANK3mxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHg1mhe7Qwtc60BuHxQ4AFQvZopxZLyz1OYerCdd5NgArJy97-BMvtjdn2JHA_aem_x4uScG9bPsl8_X9IUHq46w

in2herbs
(3,941 posts)govt there's nothing for him to govern. So what happens then? We will be 350 million people without a country. W/o a govt he has no authority to declare martial law or collect tax money.
Another idea the Rs didn't think through well enough.
We need to keep the govt shut down until the middle class gets health ins. etc.
Wednesdays
(20,865 posts)TSF: "Hold my beer."
Justice matters.
(8,940 posts)Just like mad king george III used to.
quakerboy
(14,566 posts)Deuxcents
(24,251 posts)elleng
(140,920 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 2, 2025, 01:54 AM - Edit history (1)
judging from reaction of the Generals yesterday.
GoodRaisin
(10,548 posts)Not too long ago anyone who predicted what we are seeing now would have been scoffed at as overreacting. Now hindsight IS 20-20 and the snowball just keeps getting bigger.
Figarosmom
(8,850 posts)Won't come out or be calculated during shutdown. Those numbers scare him.
edhopper
(36,671 posts)You were challenged when you said we know without doubt that the elections will be stopped.
We think he may try, but that is far from your 100% certainty.
EdmondDantes_
(959 posts)People pointed that out and it's still true. States run elections and his term will end no later than noon on January 20, 2029, presuming he doesn't succumb to his unhealthy habits before then.
Like the national Constitution prescribes certain things about elections, state constitutions mandate the elections be held. And the constitution has limits on when terms end. So if there's no election, those terms still end.
Bernardo de La Paz
(59,143 posts)Celerity
(52,221 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(34,247 posts)Because I dont wanna include all that and I havent looked for the pure link, but I will try to in the future thanks.
Celerity
(52,221 posts)remove this:
?fbclid=IwZnRzaANK3mxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHg1mhe7Qwtc60BuHxQ4AFQvZopxZLyz1OYerCdd5NgArJy97-BMvtjdn2JHA_aem_x4uScG9bPsl8_X9IUHq46w
Eliot Rosewater
(34,247 posts)That I post on this board, like when I started a thread about not having elections and then I went on to explain in detail how they could still have them but interfere with them and make them anything but democratic and fair. But if you read some peoples comments you would think I never added the rest of that to that sentence, dammit.