Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(124,695 posts)
Tue Sep 30, 2025, 03:59 PM 13 hrs ago

Was Lindsey Halligan properly appointed?


Legal AF
Sep 29, 2025

Right wing and conservative Federalist Society scholars are turning on Trump, and now question whether Lindsey Halligan was properly appointed at all, and if she wan't, then the Former FBI Director Comey indictment would be invalid for that reason alone! Popok argues on his latest Hot Take, that Trump pushing his hand picked novice prosecutor to go after Comey will make him the poster child of vindictive prosecution and how to send Trump (and Halligan) to a crushing defeat.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was Lindsey Halligan properly appointed? (Original Post) struggle4progress 13 hrs ago OP
Was Lindsey Halligan Validly Appointed as United States Attorney? LetMyPeopleVote 13 hrs ago #1
Thanx! It sure sounds like Lindsay should skeedaddle quick, afore her reputation greasily appears struggle4progress 13 hrs ago #2
I always wonder what the Bimbos have to do to get hired. Irish_Dem 12 hrs ago #3

LetMyPeopleVote

(170,428 posts)
1. Was Lindsey Halligan Validly Appointed as United States Attorney?
Tue Sep 30, 2025, 04:07 PM
13 hrs ago

There was a prior acting US Attorney for this district who was fired by trump. Evidently, that means that trump/Bondi can not appoint another acting US Attorney



https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/was-lindsey-halligan-validly-appointed-as-united-states-attorney/

There is a lot that is outrageous about the process that resulted in yesterday’s indictment of James Comey. I will focus here on what appears to be a fatal legal flaw.

As I understand the facts, it seems highly doubtful that Lindsey Halligan has been validly appointed as United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia. If her appointment is invalid, so is her indictment of Comey.

Section 546 of Title 28 of the United States Code authorizes an Attorney General to appoint an interim United States Attorney for a term of 120 days. Under section 546(d), once the 120-day term expires, “the district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.”

Acting Attorney General James McHenry evidently appointed Erik Siebert as interim United States Attorney on January 21, 2025. After his 120-day term expired, the judges of the Eastern District of Virginia appointed him to continue to serve.

On May 6, President Trump nominated Siebert to be United States Attorney. His nomination had advanced to the Senate floor when Trump learned that Siebert had “told senior Justice Department officials that investigators found insufficient evidence to bring charges against [New York attorney general Letitia] James and had also raised concerns about a potential case against Mr. Comey.” Siebert then resigned as interim United States Attorney, or Trump fired him. (Trump insists on the latter: “He didn’t quit, I fired him!”)

Can the Attorney General make a second interim appointment under section 546 when the first interim appointment has expired? The most natural reading of section 546 is that the authority to make the interim appointment then lies with the district court. And that’s evidently the position that the Department of Justice itself adopted in a 1986 Office of Legal Counsel opinion written by none other than Samuel Alito. That opinion itself might not be in the public domain, but a 1993 OLC opinion (p. 3 n. 5) states that the Alito opinion “suggest[s] that the Attorney General may not make successive interim appointments pursuant to section 546.”

I can see Comey also challenging this appointment because that may kill this indictment and then the statute of limitation may have run

struggle4progress

(124,695 posts)
2. Thanx! It sure sounds like Lindsay should skeedaddle quick, afore her reputation greasily appears
Tue Sep 30, 2025, 04:17 PM
13 hrs ago

in a whirling swirl-pool at the local sewage treatment plant

Irish_Dem

(75,580 posts)
3. I always wonder what the Bimbos have to do to get hired.
Tue Sep 30, 2025, 05:03 PM
12 hrs ago

What exactly happens in their interview with Trump?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Lindsey Halligan prop...