General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHelp me figure out something?
If it was someone from far radical left wing person who shot and killed Charlie Kirk, shot up a Catholic school, a Mormon church, a college in Colorado, a Democrat state representative and her husband, and other mass shooting in the past 9 months?
Then why havent the GOBers done anything about gun control yet? They are in control of making sure this should never happen!
One common thing is that Trump and his band of GOBers are complicit in their actions by standing by while nothing is being done. They rather shuck the responsible and blame the radical left rather than believing the facts right in front of them. Also, Trump has stoke the flames by his own rhetoric and hate speech. Yet, he calls out other for their comments, saying that criticism is not free speech!
I will never understand their behavior and hypocrisy when their own people are being attacked by their own party followers!

RockRaven
(18,076 posts)Even other people in their various demographic buckets are expendable.
D_Master81
(2,218 posts)Everything about this regime is about the narrative and spin. They dont care about improving lives they care about consolidating power more and more every day and moving towards GOP control for the foreseeable future. Q
usonian
(20,874 posts)When Black Panthers urged Black Americans to arm up.
Wikipedia:
Mulford Act
1967 California bill to repeal the law that permitted citizens to carry loaded weapons in public places
The Mulford Act was a 1967 California bill that prohibited public carrying of loaded firearms without a permit. Named after Republican assemblyman Don Mulford and signed into law by governor of California Ronald Reagan, the bill was crafted with the goal of disarming members of the Black Panther Party, which was conducting armed patrols of Oakland neighborhoods in what would later be termed copwatching.
Did you get it? Ronald Reagan.
The NRA, which by the way was thoroughly infiltrated by Russia, created a gun culture here.
NRA Was 'Foreign Asset' To Russia Ahead of 2016, New Senate Report Reveals
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/27/764879242/nra-was-foreign-asset-to-russia-ahead-of-2016-new-senate-report-reveals
And so was Trump/Krasnov
Jack Valentino
(3,385 posts)they were terrified of the idea of arming blacks....
They finally changed their mind about that at the very end of the civil war,
early in 1865, at the urging of their own top General Robert E. Lee---
but it was far too late to influence the outcome of the war,
and only a handful were ever enlisted...
Google AI Overview
Yes, the Confederacy passed a law to enlist Black men as soldiers in March 1865, but it was a desperate, last-ditch effort that had little practical effect because the war ended just weeks later. The law allowed for the experimental use of enslaved African Americans as combat soldiers, though they would retain their enslaved status unless their owners granted them freedom. However, the Confederacy lacked the time and manpower to effectively recruit, train, or equip significant numbers of these soldiers before its surrender.
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/march-13/confederacy-approves-black-soldiers
Jack Valentino
(3,385 posts)should have their gun rights taken away-- guess they aren't quite as "pro-2nd Amendment" as they claim:
Trump DOJ is looking at ways to ban transgender Americans from owning guns, sources say
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/04/politics/transgender-firearms-justice-department-second-amendment
BadgerKid
(4,907 posts)My feeling is they trapped themselves. They have to avoid working with those across the aisle so as not to offend their base, which apparently is a source of significant support.