Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(67,055 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:16 AM Yesterday

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the

Epstein files:

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the Epstein files. bsky.app/profile/acyn...

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2025-09-26T23:53:34.818Z
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the (Original Post) tblue37 Yesterday OP
Crooked Mike running interference to hide the oasis Yesterday #1
Mike Johnson is running interference for ReRe Yesterday #12
A good friend of mine... Dulcinea 11 hrs ago #65
Is Mike Johnson in the Epstein files? Sounds like it. flvegan Yesterday #2
He's too sanctimonious to ... you know what. usonian Yesterday #4
Just like Shakespeare said: They protesteth too much! n/t ReRe Yesterday #13
Look at how many preachers and priests abuse children, I can speak from experience because I was a victim Maraya1969 Yesterday #23
A sanctimonious persin is one who makes a show of being morally superior to others. ShazzieB 18 hrs ago #56
Not sure about that Kali 16 hrs ago #58
Nope, that was indeed him Bettie 1 hr ago #67
Paedophile is probably the wrong name; sexual abuser is probably better. And I bet Maraya1969 2 hrs ago #66
I don't think he's in the files Retrograde Yesterday #10
I concur. ShazzieB 18 hrs ago #50
I see no reason he would want to protect "pedophiles," plural. ShazzieB 18 hrs ago #52
If there is no other option NJCher Yesterday #3
What a partisan hack Norbert Yesterday #5
One of 147 congressional J6 Insurrectionists B.See 19 hrs ago #48
The McConnell Doctrine: BurnDoubt Yesterday #6
Wilhoit's law. usonian Yesterday #8
Yep. Thank you. BurnDoubt Yesterday #24
I bet he's in it Maraya1969 Yesterday #7
See reply #4 usonian Yesterday #11
Nope Katcat 20 hrs ago #37
I think a feder judge can do it, too. RandySF Yesterday #9
Li'l Pervy is a piece of work Hekate Yesterday #14
So, once Grijalva is sworn in, the public will get to see teh Epstein files?!? AZJonnie Yesterday #15
Republicans are protection child rapists Champp Yesterday #16
Same trick McCONnell pulled with Garland and Barrett. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Yesterday #17
Exactly shanti 18 hrs ago #51
This is BS D_Master81 Yesterday #18
Pretty obvious who Johnson sees as his true lord and savior. Paladin Yesterday #19
I'd suggest taking it to the courts, but we've now got a chapter of the Trump fan club operating within them. Vinca Yesterday #20
It's a small consolation indeed, but it's there DFW Yesterday #21
This is true, but their sheeples won't know about this erronis 20 hrs ago #38
Ominous foreshadowing for midterms 2026 Arazi Yesterday #22
Only if the cowardly Republicans let him newdeal2 21 hrs ago #33
Mike Johnson is likely a pedophile Johonny Yesterday #25
My beliefs are based on fact. Gimpyknee 19 hrs ago #47
They seem terrified to release the Epstein Files. Wonder why? surfered Yesterday #26
So when will we learn not to broadcast our strategy? Raven123 23 hrs ago #27
So is Rebl2 23 hrs ago #28
If it were any other USSC, then a Writ of Mandamus on the shadow docket no_hypocrisy 23 hrs ago #29
I knew that POS would try this. Can we get a rapture for these sociopathic hypocrites, please? Midnight Writer 22 hrs ago #30
Hoping they got the story wrong and Dark n Stormy Knight 20 hrs ago #35
I don't care where they go as long as it isn't here. Midnight Writer 20 hrs ago #36
If Moses Mikey refuses to do his effing job, MLWR 21 hrs ago #31
Republicans are corrupt. Six117 21 hrs ago #32
Ask yourself " What would republicans do" then do that. Have Rep show up and say Speaker waived swearing in. Pepsidog 21 hrs ago #34
you know, more and more I'm starting to believe that Madison Cawthorn was telling the truth about his colleagues dingosatemyusername 20 hrs ago #39
That's like having the winning Super Bowl team not get the trophy because... Beartracks 20 hrs ago #40
Jan 6, 2029 should be interesting...... Montauk6 20 hrs ago #41
What a total fucking piece of shit! Initech 19 hrs ago #42
Straight out of the Mitch McConnell playbook. Katinfl 19 hrs ago #43
lickspittle lackey protecting predators. Sounds Christ-like. Evolve Dammit 19 hrs ago #44
Our way of governing has been destroyed. spanone 19 hrs ago #45
If this isn't telling I dont know what is SamuelTheThird 19 hrs ago #46
Egads, how many congressional republicans are Emile 18 hrs ago #49
But the Felon is innocent. We aren't worried about his involvement with Buddyzbuddy 18 hrs ago #53
Direct link to the post CousinIT 18 hrs ago #54
calvinball. rules for me, not for you, or, CHEATING. pansypoo53219 18 hrs ago #55
We live in Tucson debsy 17 hrs ago #57
Time for every Dem to leave? bluestarone 16 hrs ago #59
A simple majority is required for quorum Jose Garcia 16 hrs ago #60
TY was not sure. bluestarone 16 hrs ago #61
Let him meet God GAJMac 15 hrs ago #62
I saw this coming. soldierant 12 hrs ago #63
Learned everything he could from Moscow Mitch? AllyCat 11 hrs ago #64

oasis

(52,946 posts)
1. Crooked Mike running interference to hide the
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:25 AM
Yesterday

misdeeds of his dear leader. Twisted little dweeb.

ReRe

(12,029 posts)
12. Mike Johnson is running interference for
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:09 AM
Yesterday

current and former members of the Republican Party.
The House/The Senate. The Administration. The Judicial.

Dulcinea

(9,192 posts)
65. A good friend of mine...
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 11:31 PM
11 hrs ago

...is from Louisiana & she's so embarrassed that this dork is from her home state.

flvegan

(65,300 posts)
2. Is Mike Johnson in the Epstein files? Sounds like it.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:26 AM
Yesterday

Just asking questions, though. Why would he protect pedophiles otherwise?

usonian

(20,841 posts)
4. He's too sanctimonious to ... you know what.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:34 AM
Yesterday

Some people are in there that I suspect are "supremely" important. Or just the orange Oompa Loompa.

He is a vile disgrace, covering for child molesters and their enablers, one of which he has become.

Their desperation says a damn lot.

Maraya1969

(23,352 posts)
23. Look at how many preachers and priests abuse children, I can speak from experience because I was a victim
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 08:52 AM
Yesterday

of a pastor. So when you use the word "Sanctimonious" I think that is a symptom

ShazzieB

(21,662 posts)
56. A sanctimonious persin is one who makes a show of being morally superior to others.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:46 PM
18 hrs ago

Synonyms include holier-than-thou and self-righteous. All of these words certainly apply to Johnson. I have zero respect for him, because he's a hypocrite and a spineless today. I'm not, however, aware of any evidence that he's a pedophile.

Leaving all the above aside, he is, very definitely, a Trump sycophant. He has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to bend over backwards to do the Orange Hellbeast's bidding, and this situation is no different. Trump obviously doesn't want the Epstein files released, and I'm sure Mikey will have hell to pay if he fails to prevent it from happening. I'm sure he would be willing to go to great links to avoid that. He doesn't need any motivation other than that.

I am both bemused and amused at how quick so many people here are to assume he's a pedophile, that he's trying to "protect pedophiles," or even that he's been directly involved in Epstein's pedo/sex trafficking activities, AS IF his obvious desire to keep Trump happy isn't more than sufficient motivation for his actions.

Johnson is sanctimonious, but there are many ways to be sanctimonious, not all of which include pedophilia.

Kali

(56,476 posts)
58. Not sure about that
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:11 PM
16 hrs ago

Didn't he "adopt" a young black man. Before he married his wife? Or is thar some other repuke hypocrite?

Bettie

(18,901 posts)
67. Nope, that was indeed him
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 09:08 AM
1 hr ago

and I'm certain that Epstein provided boys for some of his "friends".

I don't know whether Mikey was high enough on the food chain to partake in Epstein's offerings, but I do believe that he's a predator like most of them.

The more they prattle about god and their "personal relationship" and how much more moral they are than other people, the more likely they are to be doing shady things of all kinds. People who use religion as a bludgeon are not believers in anything but their self-perceived superiority.

Maraya1969

(23,352 posts)
66. Paedophile is probably the wrong name; sexual abuser is probably better. And I bet
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 08:26 AM
2 hrs ago

you are a man.

Retrograde

(11,288 posts)
10. I don't think he's in the files
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:49 AM
Yesterday

people he knows, or works with, or who fund GOP candidates - that's another story

ShazzieB

(21,662 posts)
50. I concur.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:01 PM
18 hrs ago

Among other things, the timeline doesn't fit. Mikey was born on January 30, 1972. If his Wikipedia article is accurate, he seems to have spent his entire life in Louisiana prior to being seated in Congress in January 2016. It's hard to see how he would have ever crossed paths with Epstein, who was arrested for the last time on July 6, 2019.

I get wanting to suspect the worst of that sanctimonious stuffed shirt, but the idea of his ever having been associated with Epstein’s pedo/sex trafficking activities is extremely farfetched, imo.

ShazzieB

(21,662 posts)
52. I see no reason he would want to protect "pedophiles," plural.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:10 PM
18 hrs ago

But I'm quite sure he wants to protect Trump. That is all the motivation he needs.

Also see my other reply in this thread, as to why it makes no sense to suspect him of being associated with Epstein's activities: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220678539#post50

NJCher

(41,538 posts)
3. If there is no other option
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:32 AM
Yesterday

Snip
A writ of mandamus is a court order compelling a public official or lower court to perform a required ministerial duty when they have failed to do so, or to correct a clear error. This "extraordinary writ" is not used for discretionary acts but only when a party has a clear legal right to the action, there is no other adequate legal remedy, and the duty is mandatory under law. Filing a petition for mandamus, often to expedite an agency's decision-making or correct an erroneous judicial ruling, leads to a court review to determine if the writ should be granted.
AI overview
Snip

AI overview

I tried it once and it went through.



Norbert

(7,387 posts)
5. What a partisan hack
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:38 AM
Yesterday

The voters spoke with an overwearing victory so he will not swear her in, silencing these voices. So sick of the GTP (Grand trump Party) and their impunity.

B.See

(6,769 posts)
48. One of 147 congressional J6 Insurrectionists
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:38 PM
19 hrs ago

who should've been locked the fk up with the rest of them. So, no surprise there.

BurnDoubt

(1,054 posts)
6. The McConnell Doctrine:
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:21 AM
Yesterday

"We do as we please.
Others must do as they're allowed."
(Paraphrased here From "Ripper Street&quot

usonian

(20,841 posts)
8. Wilhoit's law.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:47 AM
Yesterday

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”


That line—written by Frank Wilhoit—has become a popular aphorism to sum up the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the modern Republican Party.

https://pylimitics.net/wilhoits-law/

usonian

(20,841 posts)
11. See reply #4
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:51 AM
Yesterday

He wouldn't even (you know what with you know whom) unless Jesus gave him a written permission slip.


IN TRIPLICATE.

He's covering. He's an enabler.

Katcat

(492 posts)
37. Nope
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:32 PM
20 hrs ago

I don’t think he’s a real Christian, he just plays one for the cameras and for money/power.

AZJonnie

(1,636 posts)
15. So, once Grijalva is sworn in, the public will get to see teh Epstein files?!?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:07 AM
Yesterday

Well then this is amazing news, because sooner or later he'll have to swear her in.

Then she just 'votes', and bam, they're out!?!

Sweet!

D_Master81

(2,215 posts)
18. This is BS
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:37 AM
Yesterday

I’m sorry but if you win an election you should be immediately able to vote on bills and motions. I mean what’s to say if the Dems win back the house they will even allow them to be seated?

Paladin

(31,666 posts)
19. Pretty obvious who Johnson sees as his true lord and savior.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:53 AM
Yesterday

And it ain't Jesus Christ.

Vinca

(52,738 posts)
20. I'd suggest taking it to the courts, but we've now got a chapter of the Trump fan club operating within them.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 07:54 AM
Yesterday

DFW

(58,999 posts)
21. It's a small consolation indeed, but it's there
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 08:14 AM
Yesterday

This is the Republicans' was of admitting that Democrats are the people's choice, but they will do everything they can to prevent that choice from determining who governs us. Republicans despise Thomas Jefferson, channeling John Locke in the Declaration of Independence, asserting that governments derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed."

If the "consent of the governed" can be extrapolated to mean majority rule, the Republicans lose power. They obviously don't want that. Ergo:whatever method, legal, illegal, or in-between, can be employed to prevent the will of the governed from being carried out--those methods are, in Republican minds, legitimate. It is Jefferson who is, in Republican minds, illegitimate. After all, what did Jefferson know? All he did is write that Declaration of Independence that they all pretend to cherish so much, they all carry a copy of it around with them. The Republicans are with us inasmuch as they consider the pursuit of happiness a legitimate goal. When it comes to life and liberty, that's where they differ from us. That's where it turns into "not interested" for them.

erronis

(21,392 posts)
38. This is true, but their sheeples won't know about this
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:37 PM
20 hrs ago

and if stumble across some mention in the supermarket tabloid front pages will be told it's for the good of the country, flag, patriotism, nazionalism, and dear fuhrer.

Arazi

(8,391 posts)
22. Ominous foreshadowing for midterms 2026
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 08:52 AM
Yesterday

Hope I’m wrong and Johnson allows an orderly transition but I fear this is only the beginning of blocking Dems from being sworn into their rightful positions.

newdeal2

(4,207 posts)
33. Only if the cowardly Republicans let him
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:45 PM
21 hrs ago

It would only take a few on their side to topple his speakership.

Raven123

(7,075 posts)
27. So when will we learn not to broadcast our strategy?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:48 AM
23 hrs ago

Not saying Mikey wouldn’t have thought of it on his own, but why make it easy for them?

Rebl2

(17,010 posts)
28. So is
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:51 AM
23 hrs ago

he just going to refuse to swear in all democrats that win in the future? She or the party should sue him if that’s even possible. That’s part of his job and it’s dereliction of duty not to swear her into office.

no_hypocrisy

(53,178 posts)
29. If it were any other USSC, then a Writ of Mandamus on the shadow docket
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 11:01 AM
23 hrs ago

should resolve this.

A writ of mandamus is a court order compelling a public official or lower court to perform a required ministerial duty when they have failed to do so, or to correct a clear error. This "extraordinary writ" is not used for discretionary acts but only when a party has a clear legal right to the action, there is no other adequate legal remedy, and the duty is mandatory under law. Filing a petition for mandamus, often to expedite an agency's decision-making or correct an erroneous judicial ruling, leads to a court review to determine if the writ should be granted.

But we're playing Stud Poker.

Midnight Writer

(24,771 posts)
30. I knew that POS would try this. Can we get a rapture for these sociopathic hypocrites, please?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 12:31 PM
22 hrs ago

MLWR

(565 posts)
31. If Moses Mikey refuses to do his effing job,
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:14 PM
21 hrs ago

he should be replaced as Speaker. What he is doing is preventing the people who live in that AZ district from having legal representation. Maybe THEY need to sue him. They certainly have "standing."

Six117

(284 posts)
32. Republicans are corrupt.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:42 PM
21 hrs ago

There's nothing to wonder about. Rules, "norms", laws
- none of that mean anything to them. For us, when the opportunity comes around -match that energy.
Take back our country.

Pepsidog

(6,344 posts)
34. Ask yourself " What would republicans do" then do that. Have Rep show up and say Speaker waived swearing in.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 01:47 PM
21 hrs ago
39. you know, more and more I'm starting to believe that Madison Cawthorn was telling the truth about his colleagues
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:39 PM
20 hrs ago

cocaine fuel orgies

Beartracks

(14,117 posts)
40. That's like having the winning Super Bowl team not get the trophy because...
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:45 PM
20 hrs ago

... somebody blocks the scoreboard from being updated.

=============

Initech

(106,407 posts)
42. What a total fucking piece of shit!
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:50 PM
19 hrs ago

It's all about keeping their asshole in power. This is more reason for him and his ass kissing goons to be removed!

Katinfl

(516 posts)
43. Straight out of the Mitch McConnell playbook.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 02:55 PM
19 hrs ago

You know he is taking orders from trump. When will people wake up and see the light?????

spanone

(140,266 posts)
45. Our way of governing has been destroyed.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 03:15 PM
19 hrs ago

These fuckers ignore all rules with no consequence.

Buddyzbuddy

(1,554 posts)
53. But the Felon is innocent. We aren't worried about his involvement with
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:10 PM
18 hrs ago
EPSTEIN. He barely knew the man.

Hey smurf, do you think this is better or worse. If he were innocent, you have every opportunity to prove it. If he were just a traveling companion you can prove it.
He is the President in his final term. You must know or truly believe that your chosen one is a pedophile because otherwise, why would you run interference for him. In addition, you know your billionaire supporters are guilty of pedophelia. Aren't you concerned that a protector of those creeps might be suspected of similar behavior?

CousinIT

(11,878 posts)
54. Direct link to the post
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 04:13 PM
18 hrs ago

Mike Johnson refuses to swear in a Democrat who won her election in a landslide just so he can block a vote on the Epstein files. bsky.app/profile/acyn...

Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) 2025-09-26T23:53:34.818Z

debsy

(652 posts)
57. We live in Tucson
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:43 PM
17 hrs ago

We voted for Adelita Grijalva. We pay our federal taxes. Mike Johnson, swear in our representative so we can have our damn representation, you coward!

The only way republicans can win is by cheating.

bluestarone

(20,369 posts)
59. Time for every Dem to leave?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:14 PM
16 hrs ago

Would that stop the vote until she is seated? (quorum call)

soldierant

(8,961 posts)
63. I saw this coming.
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:46 PM
12 hrs ago

Of course he did. She would be the deciding vote on the discharge petition.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mike Johnson refuses to s...