Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msongs

(72,516 posts)
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 06:04 PM Sep 20

Jimmy Kimmel and Charlie Kirk What Trump et al do not understand about the Internet.(dKos)

small comforts - how trump et al cannot actually control the internet because it was designed
to be truly a world wide web......nice bit of history and explanation. by dumping kimmel the network is actually cutting its own throat down the line.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/9/18/2344255/-Jimmy-Kimmel-and-Charlie-Kirk-What-Trump-et-al-do-not-understand-about-the-Internet

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jimmy Kimmel and Charlie Kirk What Trump et al do not understand about the Internet.(dKos) (Original Post) msongs Sep 20 OP
And yet, Fox "News" plays everywhere intrepidity Sep 20 #1
Thank Jiffy Lube lame54 Sep 20 #3
Perhaps they should ask China if its possible to control internet content in one's country at least to a large degree? AZJonnie Sep 20 #2

intrepidity

(8,475 posts)
1. And yet, Fox "News" plays everywhere
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 06:39 PM
Sep 20

I don't quite understand this incongruity.

As the article portrays, yes, the Internet was built on decentralization, and yes, the Internet is far more valuable and content-rich than broadcast (or cable) television.

Yet....yet...Fox "News" has outsized and stubbornly persistent influence.

AZJonnie

(1,637 posts)
2. Perhaps they should ask China if its possible to control internet content in one's country at least to a large degree?
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:20 PM
Sep 20

Anything you can't control (if you really want to, which is a LOT), you impose draconian penalties for providing/viewing/accessing/saying whatever the government dislikes, via the internet.

I would not advise hanging my hat on the premise that the internet can't effectively be severely restricted given a government will (especially with a staggering amount of AI power at it's disposal) to do so

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jimmy Kimmel and Charlie ...