General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIsrael is committing genocide in Gaza, scholars' association says
THE HAGUE, Sept 1 (Reuters) - The world's leading genocide scholars' association has passed a resolution saying that the legal criteria have been met to establish Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, its president said on Monday.
Eighty-six percent of those who voted among the 500-member International Association of Genocide Scholars backed the resolution declaring: "Israels policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)".
"This is a definitive statement from experts in the field of genocide studies that what is going on on the ground in Gaza is genocide," the association's president, Melanie O'Brien, a professor of international law at the University of Western Australia who specialises in genocide, told Reuters.
Sergey Vasiliev, a professor of international law at the Open University in the Netherlands who is not a member of the association, told Reuters the resolution showed that "this legal assessment has become mainstream within academia, particularly in the field of genocide studies."
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-is-committing-genocide-gaza-scholars-association-says-2025-09-01/

Orrex
(65,952 posts)is that Netanyahu's apologists won't accept any classification of genocide unless Netanyahu himself formally declares his intent to commit genocide.
Until then, it's all pro-Hamas antisemitic propaganda or something.
David__77
(24,461 posts)lapucelle
(20,653 posts)lapucelle
(20,653 posts)This week, [21.6%] the International Association of Genocide Scholars passed a resolution stating Israel is committing genocide in Gaza
Under normal circumstances, [genocide scholar Dr. Sara] Brown said, any member can propose a resolution, which goes before a committee for comments and feedback. Controversial or high-stakes resolutions are brought before a virtual town hall to discuss the text. This time, when the resolution was proposed on an IAGS listserv, Brown said that she and others attempted to publish a dissent that was deleted by the moderators.
One of the executive board members who moderates the listserv refused to publish it and said they are going to have a town hall, Brown recalled. Weeks passed as we waited for the town hall I reached out to ask the president of the executive board when it would happen, and was told we dont have to hold one and were not going to.'
In addition, Brown said, the resolution was posted anonymously, and the executive board refused to reveal its authorship, an unusual move that raised red flags.
Its very telling about the biases and agenda of the leadership that they refused to host a town hall There is no interest in having a transparent dialog and debate about such an important and damning [resolution] in terms of the reputation of the IAGS, Brown said.
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/09/international-association-of-genocide-scholars-resolution-israel-sara-brown/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"86% of the members who voted" was the tip off.
Out of 500 members, 126 voted. In other words, 25.2% of the members participated in the vote for the anonymous resolution distributed through a listserv. 109 of the those who voted wanted the resolution passed.
In other words, 21.8% (not 86%) of the IAGS members voted in favor of the resolution vilifying Israel.
And due to its "you too can be a genocide scholar© if you pay us $30" policy, 20% of the IAGS members are currently located in Iran. That information was available to journalists at the time that the story about the scam resolution broke.
However, IAGS has deleted its twitter account and closed down access to its membership list in an effort at damage control concerning the scam resolution that 74.8% of the IAGS members did not vote for.
---------------------------------------------------
The Guardian (and any other media outlet) that fell for this scam without doing even the most research should be ashamed.
Rage baiting clicks is a great way for the MSM to raise revenue, but a downright disgusting abrogation of journalistic duty.

gulliver
(13,485 posts)The posts by lapucelle above show convincingly that this "resolution" is of no value. It's meaningless at best, propaganda at its worst (and most likely).
Fadel needs to be canned or needs to educate herself on the validity of the IAGS and retract.