General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's Wild Claim
Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Kamala Harris for President.
There is no basis for Trumps claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment, let alone for the endorsement in particular.
Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncés production company, which the campaign listed as a campaign event production expense.
A Harris campaign spokesperson said they didnt pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs of their appearances. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement.
As usual, Trump just makes s**t up to distract everyone from his latest screw up or scandal .

pfitz59
(11,706 posts)and can afford lawyers. Plus they have an immense fan base. Perhaps this will wake up some of the apathetic and disengaged.
jonstl08
(472 posts)He is just jealous because Kamala could actually be endorsed by big name celebrities like Beyonce and Oprah while he could only get Kid Rock. Also all those bands saying he cannot use their songs at his rallies had to bruise his ego.
Johonny
(24,273 posts)Their appearance could be considered an illegal campaign contribution. The exact opposite of what Trump is claiming.
Which means that likely Hulk Hogan and other celebrities gave illegal campaign contributions to Trump because we know Trump never pays his bills.
Redleg
(6,518 posts)Jeezus, I don't know if I can handle three more years of this shit.
LetMyPeopleVote
(167,017 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(167,017 posts)When an American president, hellbent on revenge, creates a list filled with his perceived political foes, its best not to look away.
Will Kamala Harris, Beyonce, and Oprah be prosecuted over made-up claims? Probably not.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-07-28T18:02:42.324Z
But when an authoritarian-style president, hellbent on revenge, creates a prosecute-my-enemies list, itâs best not to look away. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-adds-kamala-harris-beyonce-oprah-list-wants-prosecuted-rcna221482
I have some bad news for anybody who believed any of these claims. The Hill reported:
President Trump on Saturday doubled down on his accusations that former Vice President Harris paid celebrities to endorse her during the 2024 presidential election. The president, echoing previous claims that Harris paid Beyoncé, Oprah and Al Sharpton to support her White House bid throughout the campaign trail, said Harris and the celebrities involved should be prosecuted.
....But before that observation brings comfort to anyone, its important to acknowledge the broader landscape. The New York Times, assessing Trumps intensifying campaign of retribution, reported last week, This is what Washington thought retribution would look like."
When President Trump started his second term, there were deep fears among current and former Justice Department officials, legal experts and Democrats that Mr. Trump would follow through on his repeated promises to lock up or otherwise pursue charges against high-profile figures like Liz Cheney, James B. Comey and former President Barack Obama. Mr. Trump quickly went after perceived enemies but not always the anticipated ones and often not in the anticipated ways.
The Times analysis noted that the Republican has displayed a willingness to weaponize the federal government in novel and audacious ways, and theres ample evidence to bolster the point. Just last week, for example, Trump falsely and repeatedly accused Barack Obama of treason, suggesting the former Democratic president should be prosecuted over made-up allegations. Soon after, Trump talked up the idea of prosecuting Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, too.
....Im disinclined to look away because Im mindful of the degree to which Trump has surrounded himself with loyalists who will turn his rhetoric into action. As the aforementioned New York Times analysis added:
Repeatedly in his first term, Mr. Trump accused his perceived enemies of treason and tried to push the F.B.I. and Justice Department to indict them. He told his chief of staff that he wanted to get the I.R.S. on those who crossed him. Many of them were investigated, and two of them were the subjects of highly unusual and invasive audits, but none of them were ever charged. The difference now is that Mr. Trump, much more so than during his first term, is surrounded by aides and cabinet members who often appear willing to follow through on his angriest and most authoritarian impulses.
The Times report added, The efforts to target top officials from previous administrations appears to be gaining momentum. Watch this space.