Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 07:25 PM Sunday

I am absolutely opposed to allowing guns in schools to protect children, because so much

can go wrong. However I am in favor of Drone clubs where, in case a shooter shows up on campus, the Drone Club members can lock themselves up in a secured room with cameras and show the shooter what they learned in school.

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am absolutely opposed to allowing guns in schools to protect children, because so much (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Sunday OP
I'm good with it provided the carriers are cops and highly trained individuals... Mark.b2 Sunday #1
Cops like the ones at Uvalde? WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #2
I originally typed "non-Uvalde cops"... Mark.b2 Sunday #3
Cops aren't required to protect anybody, so I don't see why having them at schools would be useful. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #5
A cop that didnt attempt to eliminate a threat--required or not--would be a pretty sorry person... Mark.b2 Sunday #12
. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #20
Sadly, police presence doesnt guarantee violence will be avoided... Mark.b2 Sunday #24
How would we ensure Greg_In_SF Sunday #4
. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #6
They would need to operate from a secure location. Baitball Blogger Sunday #7
edited: and who is in these "Drone Clubs"?? WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #8
Seniors who have shown a high level of responsibility toward the community, Baitball Blogger Sunday #9
lmao you think children should be studying how to shoot people with drones in robotics? Baitball, indeed. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #10
Let's see, there's paintball courses where the objective is to aim and shoot at your opponent, Baitball Blogger Sunday #13
. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #16
also what are they shooting with if you don't want guns in school WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #11
Well, it's a drone club, so I'm thinking electric waffle makers? Baitball Blogger Sunday #14
I was asking what the weapon was. A drone is not a weapon. But you said tasers in the other post, which I addressed. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #17
This isn't actually popping in my head out of no where. Baitball Blogger Sunday #18
"this would be quite easy for the young to master." Again, you're okay with high school kids shooting other kids? WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #21
Roll it back, strawman. Baitball Blogger Sunday #22
. WhiskeyGrinder Sunday #23
A feeling of urgency is exactly what is missing in these situations. Baitball Blogger Sunday #25
Yes, it appears that short of regulating guns - which we democrats don't have the court or votes to do, harumph Sunday #26
One thing is obvious TnDem Sunday #15
Is that directed at me? Baitball Blogger Sunday #19

Mark.b2

(590 posts)
1. I'm good with it provided the carriers are cops and highly trained individuals...
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 07:49 PM
Sunday

and it’s disclosed to parents that guns are on campus.

Mark.b2

(590 posts)
3. I originally typed "non-Uvalde cops"...
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:03 PM
Sunday

but erased it. One of law enforcement’s most shameful moments, for sure.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
5. Cops aren't required to protect anybody, so I don't see why having them at schools would be useful.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:16 PM
Sunday

Mark.b2

(590 posts)
12. A cop that didnt attempt to eliminate a threat--required or not--would be a pretty sorry person...
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:52 PM
Sunday

Again, Uvalde comes to mind.

One would hope there’s a deterrent effect having law enforcement on-site. I pass two elementary schools on my way to/from work. Both have police officers on-site, and they park their cruisers prominently in the front.

My grandson’s private school has a sign at the entrance saying the campus is protected by armed individuals. I suppose cops dont work private schools, so I’ve not seen any cops. Either the sign is a ruse or there are some who are concealed carrying. Either way, I like the sign.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
20. .
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:21 PM
Sunday
A cop that didnt attempt to eliminate a threat--required or not--would be a pretty sorry person...Again, Uvalde comes to mind.
And, most recently, the report that came out of the Minneapolis area, regarding the assassinations and shootings of state politicians there. And the ones at Columbine. It's not unusual for it to happen.

One would hope there’s a deterrent effect having law enforcement on-site.
Research finds no evidence that School Resource Officers reduce deaths or injuries from school shootings.

I pass two elementary schools on my way to/from work. Both have police officers on-site, and they park their cruisers prominently in the front.
Okay? Do they...do they keep you from shooting kids at school?

My grandson’s private school has a sign at the entrance saying the campus is protected by armed individuals. I suppose cops dont work private schools, so I’ve not seen any cops. Either the sign is a ruse or there are some who are concealed carrying. Either way, I like the sign.
You like not knowing who's prowling around your grandson's school with a gun? Huh.

Mark.b2

(590 posts)
24. Sadly, police presence doesnt guarantee violence will be avoided...
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 10:14 PM
Sunday

or stopped. But, given a choice of having a modicum of police presence at a school or not, I’d prefer having them there. And the same goes with having, at least, well-trained civilians willing to take on a role of stepping up should it become necessary. Administrators obviously need to be highly selective in who they would permit to carry.

Growing up in and still living in Arkansas, I am comfortable around guns. I dont carry, although I will usually put a handgun under my pickup seat if I need to go to Little Rock. So, I know my familiarity with guns colors my views on this subject. I’m hardly an outlier in my community.

You and I likely agree on 90% of DU-discussed topics. It sounds like this topic falls in the 10%! LOL

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
6. .
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:26 PM
Sunday
lock themselves up in a secured room with cameras and show the shooter what they learned in school.
what on earth does this mean

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
7. They would need to operate from a secure location.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:32 PM
Sunday

Their mission: aim for the hands and unarm the guy, unless he is in an active shooter mode. In which case, set the drone on taser.

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
9. Seniors who have shown a high level of responsibility toward the community,
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:38 PM
Sunday

as in, performing community service hours and keeping a high G.P.A.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
10. lmao you think children should be studying how to shoot people with drones in robotics? Baitball, indeed.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:43 PM
Sunday

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
13. Let's see, there's paintball courses where the objective is to aim and shoot at your opponent,
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:53 PM
Sunday

there is untold number of realistic video games that does that and more.

And, if you watch Home Alone, the kid sets some pretty lethal traps that could kill someone.

So, limiting them to tasers, when they're the first line of defense in their own school grounds...yes. Anything other than lethal weapons is a good idea.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
16. .
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:58 PM
Sunday
Let's see, there's paintball courses where the objective is to aim and shoot at your opponent
Which has nothing to do with wounding or killing someone.

there is untold number of realistic video games that does that and more.
Which neither wound nor kill actual people.

And, if you watch Home Alone, the kid sets some pretty lethal traps that could kill someone.
This is a fictional movie.

So, limiting them to tasers,
Tasers are not non-lethal. They are less-lethal. They can seriously injure or kill people.

Anything other than lethal weapons is a good idea
Wielded by children. I shouldn't drink on a Sunday night because I am spilling my drink. Jesus fucking Christ.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
17. I was asking what the weapon was. A drone is not a weapon. But you said tasers in the other post, which I addressed.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:59 PM
Sunday

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
18. This isn't actually popping in my head out of no where.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:14 PM
Sunday

There was a segment on national news tonight, NBC I think, which showed a team of men doing precisely what I'm talking about. They showed the drones going through the hallways of a school. And even used the drone to kamikaze against a mannequin. What I have seen from experienced video gamers, this would be quite easy for the young to master.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
21. "this would be quite easy for the young to master." Again, you're okay with high school kids shooting other kids?
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:23 PM
Sunday

Fucking sick.

And even used the drone to kamikaze against a mannequin.
Wow, amazing.

They showed the drones going through the hallways of a school.
Cops ran a drone through Melissa and Mark Hortman's home too. They and their dog were dead at the end of it.

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
22. Roll it back, strawman.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:30 PM
Sunday

I never said kids shooting other kids. The active shooters these days are generally young men with a gun and a grudge.

What do you prefer? That school kids wait in fear until he figures a way to force the door open? At least the drones would keep him preoccupied until the police arrive.

I know you're not suggesting that the drone killed Melissa and Mark Hortman, or the dog. They were killed by an active shooter and I imagine the police used the drones to safely determine the situation.

And you just proved my point. The kids in the school would have a feeling of urgency and would act quicker than the police who arrived on site and had to determine what was going on before deciding on a plan.

WhiskeyGrinder

(25,407 posts)
23. .
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:46 PM
Sunday
I never said kids shooting other kids. The active shooters these days are generally young men with a gun and a grudge.
Oh, I take it back then. You're okay with kids shooting adults? Get help.

What do you prefer? That school kids wait in fear until he figures a way to force the door open?
No. That we prevent school shootings altogether.

At least the drones would keep him preoccupied until the police arrive.
And do what, hang around outside for an hour?

I know you're not suggesting that the drone killed Melissa and Mark Hortman, or the dog.
It's true. I'm not. But what I am saying is that people tasked and trained to stop shooters relied on tech that helped nobody. I don't want kids droning school shooters, and I don't want cops kicking their heels.

The kids in the school would have a feeling of urgency and would act quicker than the police who arrived on site and had to determine what was going on before deciding on a plan.
A feeling of urgency isn't necessarily what's missing in these cases.

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
25. A feeling of urgency is exactly what is missing in these situations.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 10:16 PM
Sunday

You even said as much when you posted in Comment #5 "5. Cops aren't required to protect anybody, so I don't see why having them at schools would be useful."

When you add that, to what you're saying here, that's some pretty non-committal positions you're pushing. You don't support having security on campus, you don't trust the police to go running into a building to protect anybody. And you don't believe kids should have even a small chance to protect themselves using non-lethal versions of drones. Your one solution: Prevent school shooting altogether.

Not sure how you go about doing that without using intrusive surveillance on the public, but that's your problem to resolve.

harumph

(2,885 posts)
26. Yes, it appears that short of regulating guns - which we democrats don't have the court or votes to do,
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 10:32 PM
Sunday

we're just SOL. Just give up folks. At least if your children die, at least you'll be able to comfort yourself
with pointless virtue signalling. I'm willing to bend my principles somewhat to at least try and prevent
school shootings. That may sometimes and in some places having armed personnel at the school.
Do I like it? No. Depressing as fuck? No doubt. I would like very to be able to live like I'm in a Nordic social democracy, but
I don't live in one.

TnDem

(1,165 posts)
15. One thing is obvious
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 08:54 PM
Sunday

Somebody has either been drinking, or has no idea from one end of a firearm to the other.

Baitball Blogger

(50,607 posts)
19. Is that directed at me?
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 09:16 PM
Sunday

I don't drink and I'm a Jr. NRA member. Do you have a third option?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am absolutely opposed t...