General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsColumbia genocide scholar may leave over university's new definition of antisemitism
By JAKE OFFENHARTZ
Updated 12:06 AM EDT, July 25, 2025
NEW YORK (AP) For years, Marianne Hirsch, a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University, has used Hannah Arendts book about the trial of a Nazi war criminal, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, to spark discussion among her students about the Holocaust and its lingering traumas.
But after Columbias recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, which casts certain criticism of Israel as hate speech, Hirsch fears she may face official sanction for even mentioning the landmark text by Arendt, a philosopher who criticized Israels founding.
For the first time since she started teaching five decades ago, Hirsch, the daughter of two Holocaust survivors, is now thinking of leaving the classroom altogether.
A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry, she told The Associated Press. I just dont see how I can teach about genocide in that environment ...
https://apnews.com/article/columbia-university-antisemitism-definition-68d44684f376b12162a28b88104e5d24

struggle4progress
(123,903 posts)Moira Donegan
Sat 26 Jul 2025 07.00 EDT
... After Columbia became the centerpiece of a nationwide movement of campus encampments in protest of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, the university administration began a frantic and at times sadistic crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus speech in an effort to appease congressional Republicans, who had gleefully seized upon the protests to make cynical and unfounded accusations that the universities were engaged in antisemitism. Columbia invited police on to its campus, who rounded up protesting students in mass arrests. This showed that the university would bend to Republican pressure, but did nothing to satisfy its Republican adversaries who demanded more and more from Columbia, making their attacks on the university the center of their broader war on education, diversity and expertise.
When the Trump administration was restored to power in January, the White House partnered with the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the General Services Administration, and the Department of Justice to exert further pressure on Columbia, looking to exert a level of control over the universitys internal operations that is unprecedented for a private institution. This time, the universitys vast federal research funding issued in the form of grants that enable university scientists, doctors and academics to make discoveries and pursue knowledge that has enormous implications for American commerce, health and wellbeing was held hostage. Facing the end of its functioning as a university, Columbia capitulated and went to what was euphemistically called the negotiating table really, an exchange on the precise terms of its extortion.
The deal that resulted gives the Trump administration everything it wants. A Trump-approved monitor will now have the right to review Columbias admissions records, with the express intent of enforcing a supreme court ban on affirmative action in other words, ensuring that the university does not admit what the Trump administration deems to be too many non-white students. The Middle Eastern studies department is subject to monitoring, as well, after an agreement in March.
The agreement is not a broad-level, generally applicable regulatory endeavor that applies to other universities although given the scope of the administrations ambitions at Columbia, it is hard to say whether such a regulatory regime would be legal. Instead, it is an individual, backroom deal, one that disregards the institutions first amendment rights and the congressionally mandated protections for its grants in order to proceed with a shakedown. The agreement, writes the Columbia Law School professor David Pozen, gives legal form to an extortion scheme. The process was something akin to a mob boss demanding protection money from a local business. Nice research university you have here, the Trump administration seemed to say to Columbia. Would be a shame if something were to happen to it ...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/26/columbia-trump-fine-universities-palestine
struggle4progress
(123,903 posts)July 25, 20255:00 AM ET
By Elissa Nadworny, Jordan Owens
... Columbia agreed to pay a $200 million fine to the federal government, over three years. The university agreed to pay an additional $21 million to settle an investigation launched in March by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission into claims of workplace harassment based on religion.
Columbia did not admit to any wrongdoing, and the university said it does not agree that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in its handling of allegations of antisemitism. The settlement agreement "is not an admission in whole or in part by either party, and Columbia expressly denies liability regarding the United States' allegations or findings."
However, in a letter yesterday to faculty and students, Columbia's acting president, Claire Shipman, noted that Columbia has "recognized, repeatedly, that Jewish students and faculty have experienced painful, unacceptable incidents, and that reform was and is needed."
Shipman acknowledged "the very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism." She pledged to "work on multiple fronts to combat all forms of hatred and intolerance at Columbia, and you will see more efforts to that end in the coming months" ...
https://www.npr.org/2025/07/25/nx-s1-5479240/columbia-trump-administration-settlement-details
AloeVera
(3,455 posts)If you're in the "in" tribe, we pledge to protect you whether you need it or not, often simply based on how you "feel".
If you're in the "other" tribe, fuck your feelings as well as your rights, and even your humanity. We don't want you here.
Samael13
(52 posts)I have to believe there are better books and authors besides one that seemed to be racist herself and wrote in defense of segregation