Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(62,523 posts)
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 12:16 PM Sunday

Moment Israeli army intercepts Gaza-bound aid ship Handala



Footage shows the moment Israeli forces intercepted an aid ship heading for Gaza on Saturday evening (26 July).

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition released a statement saying its civilian vessel Handala was intercepted about 40 miles from Gaza.

The Handala was carrying 21 civilians representing 12 countries, including parliamentarians, lawyers, journalists, labor organizers, environmentalists, and other human rights defenders.

Watch more on Independent TV: https://tinyurl.com/yc7ukx9n
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Moment Israeli army intercepts Gaza-bound aid ship Handala (Original Post) Uncle Joe Sunday OP
Israel doesn't want anyone to see the full destruction of Gaza or its starving people. Lonestarblue Sunday #1
Precisely Uncle Joe Sunday #2
spelling correction Be Leave On Sunday #5
Thanks for the footage! IDF did a great job! tritsofme Sunday #3
For sure. Guarding and filming a bunch of hands-up, unarmed humanitarians is brave work indeed. AloeVera Sunday #9
This is a certain type of "heroism" of outright criminals. David__77 Sunday #11
Don't forget handing out free sandwiches to a bunch of self-aggrandizing showoffs. Beastly Boy Sunday #17
Why do you cheer keeping food out of the mouths of starving children? David__77 Sunday #13
There wasn't a single starving child on that boat. Beastly Boy Sunday #18
Ship should be inspected sabbat hunter Sunday #4
What, no "piracy"? Ho "highjacking"? No SOS signals? No "unprovoked attack in international waters"? Beastly Boy Sunday #6
It is an illegal blockade. David__77 Sunday #12
No it is not. Beastly Boy Sunday #15
Not until you brought it up. Iggo Sunday #14
Not trying to mean Samael13 Sunday #7
Works fine for me. N/T AloeVera Sunday #10
your link: Celerity Sunday #21
The IDF heroically defended Gaza from an invasion of vicious humanitarians delivering food and medicine to Ping Tung Sunday #8
The IDF prevented breach of a legal blockade, and their action was predictable and expected. Beastly Boy Sunday #16
Breaches of International Law? From someone who defends war crimes and the boss who orders the atrocities. Ping Tung Sunday #19
Ad hominem anyone? Beastly Boy Sunday #20

Lonestarblue

(12,846 posts)
1. Israel doesn't want anyone to see the full destruction of Gaza or its starving people.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 12:26 PM
Sunday

Palestinian children are being starved deliberately. Women and children gave been killed in unusual numbers in this war because without them there is no Palestinian future. The Netanyahu government needs to be tried for war crimes now.

Be Leave On

(263 posts)
5. spelling correction
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 02:12 PM
Sunday

Palestinian children are being starved deliberately. Women and children have been killed in unusual numbers in this genocide because without them there is no Palestinian future. The Netanyahu government needs to be tried for war crimes now.

AloeVera

(3,455 posts)
9. For sure. Guarding and filming a bunch of hands-up, unarmed humanitarians is brave work indeed.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 03:23 PM
Sunday

Though the people of Gaza no doubt benefitted from these soldiers' absence, as short as it may have been.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
17. Don't forget handing out free sandwiches to a bunch of self-aggrandizing showoffs.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 05:03 PM
Sunday

Dirty work, but someone's got to do it.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
18. There wasn't a single starving child on that boat.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 05:07 PM
Sunday

A bunch of publicity-seeking brats, but they were only acting like children. And they were fed.

sabbat hunter

(7,015 posts)
4. Ship should be inspected
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 12:31 PM
Sunday

make sure there are no weapons on board, then allowed to proceed to give people living in Gaza much needed food.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
6. What, no "piracy"? Ho "highjacking"? No SOS signals? No "unprovoked attack in international waters"?
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 02:17 PM
Sunday

In related news:

Israel seeks permanent seizure of Gaza-bound 'Freedom Flotilla' ship

Israel has filed a request to permanently confiscate the Gaza-bound ship Madleen from the “Freedom Flotilla,” after it attempted to break the naval blockade on the Gaza Strip.

The request, submitted Thursday by the Haifa District Attorney’s Office on behalf of the State of Israel, was made to the Haifa District Court sitting as a maritime court. The state is asking to seize the vessel “in favor of the state treasury.”

The Madleen was intercepted early last month by the Israeli Navy as it approached the waters off Gaza. According to the government’s statement, the ship had "attempted to violate the legal naval blockade imposed on the Gaza Strip.”

“The request submitted by the Haifa District Attorney’s Office is based on international law, which grants countries the right to seize vessels that attempt to breach a naval blockade, and gives the court authority to order their forfeiture. According to the laws of naval warfare, breaching or attempting to breach a blockade gives the state the right to search and seize the vessel,” the statement said.
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/ryk8hflpge

David__77

(24,358 posts)
12. It is an illegal blockade.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 03:51 PM
Sunday

Israel's blockade is illegal under international law (Geneva Conventions Article 33). Confiscating aid ships is collective punishment.

This isn't security - it's starvation as a weapon.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
15. No it is not.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 04:45 PM
Sunday

Article 33 of the additional protocols to the fourth Geneva convention is only applicable to "protected persons" as defined in Article 4 of the Fourth Geneva convention:

Article 4

Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals.
https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf

Neither the ship in question nor its occupants were in conflict with Israel at the time they found themselves in Israel's hands. They are not covered by the article you think they are covered by.

A blockade, on the the hand, is a legitimate method of warfare and is covered in Articles 93 - 108 of the additional protocols to the Geneva Conventions. Article 98 specifically states:
98. Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/san-remo-manual-1994/article-93-108

It's a friggin legal and legitimate blockade under international law. And anyone resisting capture would have put themselves at risk of legitimate military attack.

Samael13

(52 posts)
7. Not trying to mean
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 02:20 PM
Sunday

But i think your link may be wrong I clicked it to check out the whole story and it brought me to some video about a celebrity taking about penis socks

Ping Tung

(3,177 posts)
8. The IDF heroically defended Gaza from an invasion of vicious humanitarians delivering food and medicine to
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 02:25 PM
Sunday

well fed, healthy, survivors of war crimes.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
16. The IDF prevented breach of a legal blockade, and their action was predictable and expected.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 04:58 PM
Sunday

Last edited Sun Jul 27, 2025, 05:29 PM - Edit history (1)

My guess is Gretta's rave reviews of the free IDF ham sandwiches made the prospects of detainment irresistibly enticing, despite violations of international law.

Ping Tung

(3,177 posts)
19. Breaches of International Law? From someone who defends war crimes and the boss who orders the atrocities.
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 06:41 PM
Sunday

And, the ones who are ducking warrants from the International Criminal Court.

Beastly Boy

(13,184 posts)
20. Ad hominem anyone?
Sun Jul 27, 2025, 07:34 PM
Sunday

Deflection anyone?

Tell me something about breach of blockade I don't know about. Otherwise, you are off topic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Moment Israeli army inter...