he always wants the big payout stuff....trafficing would provide monies he craves...I can't just see him being a "John" with all the profits flying about this high dollar payout...plus, he is kinky/ perverted with young girls for sure....this makes sense to me.Maxwell has supporting evidence I believe and it is dispersed with a back up plan if she is say...injured.

he got his cut by suppling the feeding ground to lure the minors.

The dots are connecting....

I can't believe there isn't a lawsuit out there if they used his name.



https://web.archive.org/web/20150807175953/http://www.trumpescorts.com/about-us/]

Why didn’t we know about this? Looks like it was up from 1999-2015. They claim to be international high end ‘escorts’ for dates — why show pics in bikinis and skimpy lingerie. A little digging here would find more, I’m sure!

Archive links usually have a link to the original source, but if this one doesn’t, it’s likely made up.

Here’s the actual page I got the quote from. I didn’t feel comfortable clicking on the pictures.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150817020804/http://www.trumpescorts.com/three-star-escorts/

You can actually browse the site. The escorts are rated from three stars to VIP six stars. The copyright is 1999-2015.

I did a quick research on it and apparently he got a copyright to the name Trump Escorts in 2017 for China

Anyway, more research should be done on this.

The copyright dates are just made up.

So, rather than being a “pile of evidence” out in broad daylight that anybody can access, but has somehow been secret for 10 years, it would make this whole thread nothing but misinformation.

I wonder if this will dawn on magats?

And how many congress critters were involved, & if scrotus was as well...

His MAGAS never bring this up either...his tax returns! Oh...this could be intresting...

had some shady business workaround.

Who knows but to answer like Trump would “I don’t know but you know some people think so”

I doubt any questions about tsf were asked.

That was the first question

Then...will you say that under oath?

I've often said that I think that Trump is involved in human trafficking.

His border policies - especially when he separated families during his first term - seem designed to kidnap children and young people. It's even more obvious this term.

There is a market for sex slaves, domestic slaves (who are also sexually abused), and babies for adoption.

We want to believe that nobody would do such a thing but that's not true. History shows that's not true. Many people, given the opportunity, will buy slaves.

Trump mostly makes money slapping his name on stuff. Also why wouldn't Epstein have thrown Trump under the bus when he was arrested?

They were close friends at the time, then after a falling out over a Palm Beach real estate deal, a vindictive and angry Trump dropped a dime on Epstein. How did Trump know so much about Epstein's illegal activities?

Edited to add from DU posting, link below:

Johnathan Alter posted this interview a few days ago.

JONATHAN ALTER:

Why did the friendship end?

MICHAEL WOLFF:

It ended over real estate. In 2004, Epstein believed he was the high bidder on a Palm Beach house at $36 million and took Trump to see it and to give him advice on moving the swimming pool. Trump then promptly went around his back and outbid him at $40 million, though he likely didn’t have $40 million; Epstein believed Trump was fronting for someone and threatened to sue him. Epstein believed Trump then informed the police in Palm Beach that he had a never-ending stream of underage girls in and out of his house there, and thus began his long years of legal peril.


https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220513060

Seems like Ivana was involved as well.

He prefers washed up porn stars for extra-curricular activity.

Could have, may have, etc.

I think Trump was an eager consumer of Epstein’s services, no evidence otherwise so far.

Or, do you feel powerful giving grammar corrections instead of discussion feedback? I do spell check....if you understand the concept...I say then, mission accomplished as this is not a college paper....

I find it rude and unkind actually....We should support/ embrace our peers here at DU.

Please do not do that ever again to me anyways....

No judgement otherwise.

Put me on ignore if it helps you.... My focus is the discussion issues...If you asked me first, well that is healthy communication....blunt correction is not welcomed as I find it is rude...may be correct information but it is offensive to me.

There are some here who have no interest to actually contribute to a discussion in an intelligent or helpful way. Some will just be the correction police and jump in to nitpick some insignificant minor detail to show everyone how smart they are.

Let's see. Guy owns teen beauty pageants and has access to vulnerable young girls. Best friend traffics vulnerable young girls.
I've always assumed his involvement was obvious to everyone.

He uses 45-47 to claim that he was actually president number 46.

Sorry, that's one of my pet peeves.

Maybe get over it.... or just put all my post on ignore..... Grammar Nazi actions....hurts peoples feelings....

I think it's important to speak and write properly. Language is a powerful tool. Especially if used correctly.

Your perceived help is not helpful..... Some may say it's passive aggressive/ trying to pick a fight tone....whatever...just ignore me....Ultimately, I don't want your help.

And count it as a learning experience? Sheesh!

He thinks he can get away with anything. So of course.

The real dirt in the Steele Dossier and other Russian kompromat was never about the "Pee" tape. It was about him participating in sex trafficking of girls, and money laundering. That is why he has been so desperate to keep it covered up. And, the Guardians of Pedophiles in Congress wouldn't continue to protect him if at least some of them weren't implicated, too. The same goes for a bunch of their billionaire donors. The Russians did hack the GOP's servers, too, after all.